@sustaincsusm profile picture

CSUSM SUSTAINABILITY

@sustaincsusm

1,815
Followers
722
Following
12
Posts
65Instapect ScoreB−

Instapect Score

65/100 · grade B− — a performance read, benchmarked against under 5K followers.

Nano tier1,815 followersAudience Reach30/100Benchmarked against under 5K followers
Engagement rate
5.69%

by followers · typical 4.00%

Avg likes
103

median 65

Avg comments
0

median 0

Cadence
1.0

posts / week · 6.9 d apart

Comment-to-like
0.39%

healthy band 1–3%

Median ER
3.58%

middle post in the sample

Public-profile audit · 10 posts sampled (2 pinned excluded) · retrieved 7 Sept 2026· served from cache

Sustainability at CSUSM is a campus-wide initiative 🐾🌎 Get involved & help make our campus a leader in sustainability! 💙♻️ #JourneytoZeroWaste

linktr.ee/sustaincsusm

Profile snapshot

Headline public metrics for @sustaincsusm, from 10 sampled posts. Averages sit beside medians so one viral post cannot flatter the picture.

Engagement rate

5.69%

(avg likes + avg comments) ÷ followers · median 3.58% · under 5K followers

Average likes

103

Median 65 · 10 posts with a visible like count

Average comments

0

Median 0 · comment-to-like 0.4%

Posting cadence

1.0posts / week

About one post every 6.9 days

Latest posts

Newest first · engagement rate by followers per post

2 Sept 2026 · carousel

Save Money on Textbooks & Borrow a Lab Coat! The University Library is hosting several tabling events to help students save money on textbooks this semester! Library Reserves staff and librarians will be available to answer questions and help you find the most affordable places to purchase or access your textbooks. Don't Go Textbook Broke Events 📚 September 2-9, 2026 11:00 a.m.–2:00 p.m. Inside Kellogg Library Lab Coats Available! 🥼 Thursday, September 3, 2026 11:00 a.m.–2:00 p.m. Outside Kellogg Library, 3rd Floorm Entrance The University Library has partnered with Safety, Health, & Sustainability to offer semester-long lab coat checkouts for students. Swipe ➡️ to learn more! #CSUSM #CSUSMLibrary #DGTB

90

likes

0

comments

4.96%

ER

25 Aug 2026 · reel

Learn about Black Oak Hall’s new trash chutes!! We are so excited about this cool new tech that will make zero waste behaviors even easier! See you at move-in Cougars!! 💙♻️ #zerowaste #sustainability #trashchutes #collegedorm #dormmovein

457

likes

3

comments

25.34%

ER

12 Aug 2026 · carousel

Kinda chic to be sustainable ♻️🌎

80

likes

0

comments

4.41%

ER

6 Aug 2026 · reel

Exciting news Cougars, the new Kwíila Dining now allows students to take food to-go using OZZI containers! 🍏 The OZZI reuse system helps reduce landfill waste, eliminates paper and foam containers, and is user-friendly! 🌎

63

likes

0

comments

3.47%

ER

5 Aug 2026 · reel

By the end of 2027, we’ll have one on every floor of every building! Remember to bring your reusable water bottle to campus and stay hydrated 💙♻️

29

likes

0

comments

1.60%

ER

30 Jul 2026 · reel

Did you know we have 5 solar-powdered charging benches on campus? 🔌☀️ These charging benches have wireless charging for your phone and outlets if you have a plug. They are powered by the sun, so it is completely free to use! They help keep our campus sustainable and it’s a great place to relax at! 😎 They are located at: 1. Engineering Pavilion (2) 2. Palm Court 3. Arts Building 4. USU Loop

67

likes

0

comments

3.69%

ER

How the score was built

The verdict is at the top of the page; this is the reasoning underneath it. Every sub-score prints its own weight and formula — no black box.

Archetype

Breakout Creator

Produces outliers well above its own baseline. The best posts are a template, not luck.

Nominal weights: Engagement 35% · Engagement Quality 25% · Consistency 15% · Content Performance 15% · Growth 10%. Audience Reach is context only and carries no weight — every account is graded against peers in its own follower tier · composite from 3 of 5 signals — unavailable sub-scores are excluded from both sums, not scored zero

Audience Reach

30 /100

Nano tier

1,815 followers (under 10K followers). An asset score: how many people this account can reach. It does not move with how well the posts perform.

Audience Reach

30 /100

1,815 followers puts this account in the Nano tier (under 10K followers). This is an asset score — how many people the account can reach — and it never moves based on how well the posts perform.

Weight 0% · log-scaled followers: L = log10(followers); L≤3 → 5–25, 3<L≤6 → 25 + (L − 3) × 20, L>6 → 85 + (L − 6) × 15, capped 100

log10(1,815) = 3.26, mapped as 25 + (L − 3) × 20 across the 1K–1M range (1K=25, 10K=45, 100K=65, 1M=85, 10M=100).

Engagement

68 /100

Engagement rate 5.69%, above the 4.00% typical rate for accounts with under 5K followers. Typical is 4.00%.

Weight 35% · piecewise-linear percentile curve for under 5K followers: 0%→5, p25 2.00%→30, p50 4.00%→55, p90 8.00%→85, 14.40%→100

Engagement rate 5.69% mapped onto the under 5K followers percentile curve (0%→5, p25 2.00%→30, p50 4.00%→55, p90 8.00%→85), measured across 10 of 10 sampled posts with visible like counts.

Engagement Quality

Not measurable

Weight 25% · comment-to-like ratio = avg comments ÷ avg likes × 100, mapped 0%→5, 0.5%→30, 1.5%→65, 3%→90, ≥5%→100

The typical post carries 0 comments, below the 5-comment base at which a comment-to-like ratio is statistically meaningful. One or two reactions expressed as a percentage is not a measurement, so the weight is redistributed rather than scored.

Consistency

40 /100

Posting cadence 1.01 posts per week, approaching the healthy 3–7 per week band. Gaps between posts vary by 0.57× the mean gap of 6.9 days — under 0.5× reads as a dependable rhythm.

Weight 15% · 60 × (1 − clamp(stdev(gaps) ÷ mean(gaps), 0, 1)) + 40 × cadence factor (0/wk → 0, 3/wk → 1.0, 3–7/wk → 1.0, 14/wk → 0.6, ≥21/wk → 0.3)

regularity 0.43 (1 − stdev 3.9d ÷ mean gap 6.9d) and cadence factor 0.34 from 1.0 posts/week (0→0, ramping to 1.0 at 3/wk, flat 1.0 through 7/wk, tapering to 0.6 at 14/wk and 0.3 at 21+/wk).

Content Performance

85 /100

The best post in the window drew 5.0× the median post's likes — 1× means no post ever breaks out, 3× or more means the account reliably produces outliers worth repeating. 40% of sampled posts carry both a caption and at least one hashtag (a well-kept feed is usually above 80%), across 2 distinct formats.

Weight 15% · 60 × upside score (top-post likes ÷ median likes: 1×→30, 2×→60, 3×→80, ≥5×→100) + 25 × caption-and-hashtag share + 15 × format mix (1.0 if ≥2 product types, else 0.5)

upside 5.00× (top post 457 likes ÷ median 65) scoring 100, enrichment 0.40 (caption + ≥1 hashtag), format mix 1.0 (2 distinct product types).

Growth Signals

Not measurable

Weight 10% · clamp(50 + weekly follower growth % × 25, 0, 100), where weekly % = (followers now ÷ followers then − 1) × 100 ÷ weeks

This is the first recorded audit of this account, so there is no observation window yet. Instagram publishes no follower history — Instapect measures growth by comparing snapshots it takes itself, and the trend appears from the second audit that is at least 7 days later.

Growth & cadence

Instagram publishes no follower history, so Instapect builds its own: every audit records a snapshot, and the trend below is measured across those snapshots. Everything else here comes from the visible posting record.

Follower growth

This is the first recorded audit of this account, so there is no observation window yet. Instagram publishes no follower history — Instapect measures growth by comparing snapshots it takes itself, and the trend appears from the second audit that is at least 7 days later.

Engagement rate per post (%)

Oldest to newest across the sampled posts. Unit: % of followers.

Likes and comments per post

Unit: absolute interactions per post.

Free account required

Create a free account to see when this account posts and when its audience actually responds — weekday mix and hour-of-day heatmap.

Engagement diagnostics

Averages are easily distorted by one viral post. The median tells you what a typical post actually does — read them side by side.

Average engagement rate

5.69%

Mean of (likes + comments) ÷ followers

Comment-only engagement rate

0.02%

Comments ÷ followers × 100 — the honest fallback when likes are hidden

Median engagement rate

3.58%

Middle post in the sample

Comment-to-like ratio

0.4%

Higher means more conversational audience

Like-based sample

10of 10 posts

Every sampled post shows its like count. Comment metrics use all 10 posts.

Free account required

Create a free account to see the full engagement distribution — how far the best and worst posts sit from the median.

Content leaderboard

Posts ranked by engagement rate by followers. Pinned posts are shown because a reader will recognise them, but they sit outside the measured window and feed no average, rate or rhythm.

Free account required

Create a free account to see the full content breakdown — every top post with its thumbnail and per-post engagement rate.

Hashtags & mentions

Frequency from captions in the sample, with the average engagement rate of the posts each tag appears on. Association, not causation.

Free account required

Create a free account to see the full hashtag and mention detail, with the engagement associated with each tag.

Action plan

Prioritised by expected impact, written from the measured data above. The advisor sees only the metrics this report could actually compute — never an estimate, never a metric Instagram keeps private.

Free account required

Create a free account to read the full AI action plan, the content plan, post ideas, hashtag strategy and best time to post for this account.

Methodology & caveats

What this report measures, how, and what it deliberately does not claim.

What this account does not make measurable

  • 2 pinned posts were detected at the head of the response and excluded from the content window, leaving 10 of the 12 returned items. Pinned posts hold permanent placement and keep accumulating engagement, and the oldest one manufactures a gap that never happened — so they are excluded from cadence, gaps, regularity, format mix and every average. They still appear in the content leaderboard, badged "Pinned".
  • The content sample is the 10-item recent-posts window. The reels endpoint reaches further back and covers Reels only, so it is used to enrich matched items with their play count (6 matched) — never to extend the sample, which would inflate the Reel share and corrupt cadence.
  • 6 older Reels outside the content window are shown separately in "Top Reels by plays" with their own window, and are excluded from every average, the format mix and all cadence maths.
  • Play counts are published public counts shown only where the provider returns them. They are not reach, views or watch time, and none of those are available for a public-profile audit.

KPI definitions

  • Engagement rate by followers = (average likes + average comments) ÷ followers × 100.
  • Median engagement rate = the middle post's engagement rate in the sample; robust to viral outliers.
  • Posting cadence = (sampled posts − 1) ÷ days spanned × 7. Intervals, not posts: n posts span n−1 gaps. Unavailable below 2 posts or a zero-day window.
  • Instapect Score = 0.35 × Engagement + 0.25 × Engagement Quality + 0.15 × Consistency + 0.15 × Content Performance + 0.10 × Growth Signals, renormalised over the sub-scores that could be measured. Every account is graded against peers in its own follower tier; Audience Reach is reported separately and carries no weight.
  • Comment-to-like ratio = average comments ÷ average likes × 100. A healthy conversational account sits between 1% and 3%.

Sample, source & limits

  • 10 public posts sampled (10 usable for like-based metrics) · retrieved 7 Sept 2026 · served from the 24-hour cache.
  • Only lawfully-visible public signals are used: published posts, visible counts, captions, hashtags, mentions and timestamps.
  • Instapect never reports reach, impressions, audience demographics, Story insights or Reels watch-time. Those are private to the account owner and any tool claiming them for a third party is guessing.
  • Benchmarks are published industry medians by follower tier and are indicative, not guarantees. Any forward-looking figure is labelled an estimate with its method stated.

Share this score

A ready-to-post card with the Instapect Score, grade and the headline public metrics. Free to download — no account needed.

No card generated for this profile yet.

Cards show only lawfully-visible public metrics and carry the sample size and retrieval date, so anyone who sees one can check the full report.

This report is built only from lawfully-visible public Instagram signals — published posts and visible counts. It contains no reach, impressions, demographics, Story insights or watch-time, because nobody outside the account can see those. Request removal and the report is delisted from the directory, the category hubs and the sitemap.