9GAG: Go Fun The World Verified

@9gag

52M
Followers: 33
Following: 12
Posts

39Instapect ScoreF

Instapect Score

39/100 · grade F — a performance read, benchmarked against 1M+ followers.

Mega tier52M followersAudience Reach100/100Benchmarked against 1M+ followers

Engagement rate: 0.08%
Avg likes: 43.6K
Avg comments: 205
Cadence: 44.2
Comment-to-like: 0.47%
Median ER: 0.07%

Public-profile audit · 11 posts sampled (1 pinned excluded) · retrieved 5 Sept 2026· served from cache

Building @memeland, one meme at a time. Follow our mascot @potatozzz 🥔

shop.9gag.com

Profile snapshot

Headline public metrics for @9gag, from 11 sampled posts. Averages sit beside medians so one viral post cannot flatter the picture.

Engagement rate

0.08%

(avg likes + avg comments) ÷ followers · median 0.07% · 1M+ followers

Average likes

43.6K

Median 37.4K · 11 posts with a visible like count

Average comments

205

Median 65 · comment-to-like 0.5%

Posting cadence

44.2posts / week

About one post every 0.2 days

How the score was built

The verdict is at the top of the page; this is the reasoning underneath it. Every sub-score prints its own weight and formula — no black box.

Archetype

Broad Reach, Low Interaction

A large audience that is not currently reacting. The follower base is a real asset; what the posts ask that audience to do is the lever.

Nominal weights: Engagement 35% · Engagement Quality 25% · Consistency 15% · Content Performance 15% · Growth 10%. Audience Reach is context only and carries no weight — every account is graded against peers in its own follower tier · composite from 4 of 5 signals — unavailable sub-scores are excluded from both sums, not scored zero

Audience Reach

100 /100

Mega tier

52,035,613 followers (1M+ followers). An asset score: how many people this account can reach. It does not move with how well the posts perform.

What this means

Audience–engagement mismatch

With 52,035,613 followers, an engagement rate of 0.08% sits below the 0.15% bottom quartile for 1M+ followers, and only 0.47 comments arrive per 100 likes against a healthy 1–3. The follower count is large but the audience currently reaching the posts is not reacting to them. This is the most consequential thing in the report: the lever is what the content asks the audience to do, not how many people follow.

Audience Reach

100 /100

52,035,613 followers puts this account in the Mega tier (1M+ followers). This is an asset score — how many people the account can reach — and it never moves based on how well the posts perform.

Weight 0% · log-scaled followers: L = log10(followers); L≤3 → 5–25, 3<L≤6 → 25 + (L − 3) × 20, L>6 → 85 + (L − 6) × 15, capped 100

log10(52,035,613) = 7.72, mapped as 25 + (L − 3) × 20 across the 1K–1M range (1K=25, 10K=45, 100K=65, 1M=85, 10M=100).

Engagement

19 /100

Engagement rate 0.08%, below the 0.15% bottom quartile for accounts with 1M+ followers. Typical is 0.35%.

Weight 35% · piecewise-linear percentile curve for 1M+ followers: 0%→5, p25 0.15%→30, p50 0.35%→55, p90 0.90%→85, 1.62%→100

Engagement rate 0.08% mapped onto the 1M+ followers percentile curve (0%→5, p25 0.15%→30, p50 0.35%→55, p90 0.90%→85), measured across 11 of 11 sampled posts with visible like counts.

Engagement Quality

28 /100

0.47 comments per 100 likes, well below the 1–3% healthy band — the audience is scrolling past rather than replying. A comment costs far more effort than a like, so this ratio measures conversation rather than reach.

Weight 25% · comment-to-like ratio = avg comments ÷ avg likes × 100, mapped 0%→5, 0.5%→30, 1.5%→65, 3%→90, ≥5%→100

0.47 comments per 100 likes mapped as 0%→5, 0.5%→30, 1.5%→65, 3%→90, ≥5%→100.

Consistency

54 /100

Posting cadence 44.22 posts per week, far above the healthy 3–7 per week band — this is volume rather than rhythm. Gaps between posts vary by 0.31× the mean gap of 0.2 days — under 0.5× reads as a dependable rhythm.

Weight 15% · 60 × (1 − clamp(stdev(gaps) ÷ mean(gaps), 0, 1)) + 40 × cadence factor (0/wk → 0, 3/wk → 1.0, 3–7/wk → 1.0, 14/wk → 0.6, ≥21/wk → 0.3)

regularity 0.69 (1 − stdev 0.0d ÷ mean gap 0.2d) and cadence factor 0.30 from 44.2 posts/week (0→0, ramping to 1.0 at 3/wk, flat 1.0 through 7/wk, tapering to 0.6 at 14/wk and 0.3 at 21+/wk).

Content Performance

88 /100

The best post in the window drew 3.8× the median post's likes — 1× means no post ever breaks out, 3× or more means the account reliably produces outliers worth repeating. 82% of sampled posts carry both a caption and at least one hashtag (a well-kept feed is usually above 80%), across 3 distinct formats.

Weight 15% · 60 × upside score (top-post likes ÷ median likes: 1×→30, 2×→60, 3×→80, ≥5×→100) + 25 × caption-and-hashtag share + 15 × format mix (1.0 if ≥2 product types, else 0.5)

upside 3.83× (top post 142,939 likes ÷ median 37,352) scoring 88, enrichment 0.82 (caption + ≥1 hashtag), format mix 1.0 (3 distinct product types).

Growth Signals

Not measurable

Weight 10% · clamp(50 + weekly follower growth % × 25, 0, 100), where weekly % = (followers now ÷ followers then − 1) × 100 ÷ weeks

First recorded audit of this account.

Growth & cadence

Instagram publishes no follower history, so Instapect builds its own: every audit records a snapshot, and the trend below is measured across those snapshots. Everything else here comes from the visible posting record.

Follower growth

First recorded audit of this account.

Engagement rate per post (%)

Oldest to newest across the sampled posts. Unit: % of followers.

Likes and comments per post

Unit: absolute interactions per post.

Free account required

Create a free account to see when this account posts and when its audience actually responds — weekday mix and hour-of-day heatmap.

Create a free account Sign in

Engagement diagnostics

Averages are easily distorted by one viral post. The median tells you what a typical post actually does — read them side by side.

Average engagement rate

0.08%

Mean of (likes + comments) ÷ followers

Comment-only engagement rate

0.00%

Comments ÷ followers × 100 — the honest fallback when likes are hidden

Median engagement rate

0.07%

Middle post in the sample

Comment-to-like ratio

0.5%

Higher means more conversational audience

Like-based sample

11of 11 posts

Every sampled post shows its like count. Comment metrics use all 11 posts.

Free account required

Create a free account to see the full engagement distribution — how far the best and worst posts sit from the median.

Create a free account Sign in

Content leaderboard

Posts ranked by engagement rate by followers. Pinned posts are shown because a reader will recognise them, but they sit outside the measured window and feed no average, rate or rhythm.

#	Post	Date	Format	Likes	Comments	Plays	ER
1	what is bro staying awake for 📹 @officialaqibra - #9gag #bunny	4 Sept 2026	reel	142.9K	231	2.6M	0.28%
2	imagine you got a Patrick 📹 @mdrktsyfaaa_ - #Spongebob #9gag	5 Sept 2026	reel	86.6K	661	4M	0.17%
3	wish I could turn back time - #childhood #adulthood #memes #9gag	5 Sept 2026	image	54.8K	123		0.11%
4	leave me alone 📸 katrell.hunter \| FB - #boss #work #memes #9gag	4 Sept 2026	image	53.1K	63		0.10%
5	welcome back Mai Shiranui 📹 @gaurrav888 - #gaurrav888 #9gag	4 Sept 2026	reel	44.9K	928	2.3M	0.09%
6	on your face! 📹 @mumumu_ko.2017.02.17 - #9gag #shibainu #doggo	5 Sept 2026	carousel	37.4K	29		0.07%
7	when the essay is due in 3 hours 📸 devmooreurl \| TT - #tabs #memes #9gag	4 Sept 2026	image	26.7K	65		0.05%
8	technically it's indeed curved - #gaming #monitor #memes #9gag	4 Sept 2026	image	24.2K	82		0.05%
9	20+ years of bromance… what’s their secret?😮🎤 Tune in as Epik High spills the tea on their secret to staying together, while Tablo gives us a little update on how his body’s holding up. 🙊 @blobyblo @realmithrajin @realtukutz - #EpikHigh #EPIKASE #9gagAMA #9gag	4 Sept 2026	reel Pinned	16K	132	1.1M	0.03%
10	Dragon Ball Trunks GT card art by @3devious_art. Power level:💥	5 Sept 2026	reel	6,197	33	804.5K	0.01%

Top Reels by plays

Published play counts only — not reach, views or watch time.

Separate population from the audit sample · 12 Reels with a published play count · 2 Sept 2026 – 5 Sept 2026 · includes 7 Reels older than the 11-post content window, excluded from every metric above.

🙉 🎥@scuderiaferrari #ferrari #memes #9gag
10.7M
plays
gotta help her from my screen 📹 @karma62346 - #emoji #9gag
7.3M
plays
speedrunning to the eternal rest 📹 @alex_ander_jo - #9gag #sleep #aging
5.8M
plays
imagine you got a Patrick 📹 @mdrktsyfaaa_ - #Spongebob #9gag
4M
plays
dogs when activities require 0 dogs 📹 @hugo_themalamute - #9gag #goldenretriever
3M
plays

Free account required

Create a free account to see the full content breakdown — every top post with its thumbnail and per-post engagement rate.

Create a free account Sign in

Hashtags & mentions

Frequency from captions in the sample, with the average engagement rate of the posts each tag appears on. Association, not causation.

Free account required

Create a free account to see the full hashtag and mention detail, with the engagement associated with each tag.

Create a free account Sign in

Action plan

Prioritised by expected impact, written from the measured data above. The advisor sees only the metrics this report could actually compute — never an estimate, never a metric Instagram keeps private.

Content plan

Built by arithmetic over this account's audited sample — no estimates, no metrics Instagram keeps private. Anything that could not be measured is left out rather than guessed.

Target cadence: Measured cadence is 44.2 posts per week, averaging 0.2 days between posts. Recommendation: consolidate from 44.2 down to 5–7 stronger posts a week. The 3–7 per week band is where consistency scores highest without thinning each post's engagement.
Format mix to shift toward: Observed across the 11-post window: feed 5/11, clips 4/11, carousel_container 2/11. feed leads at 5 of 11. Keep the leading format as the backbone and rotate the others deliberately rather than incidentally.
What the best post did differently: The strongest post in the window drew 142.9K likes against a median of 37.4K — 3.83× the typical post — as a clips published 4 Sept 2026, opening "what is bro staying awake for 📹 @officialaqibra - #9gag #bunny". Treat that post as a template, not a fluke: repeat its format and its opening move.
Captions & hashtags: 82% of sampled posts carry both a caption and at least one hashtag; a well-kept feed sits above 80%. The most-used tag is #9gag (9× in the sample, averaging 0.10% engagement on the posts it appears on). Association, not causation — tags travel with the posts, they do not by themselves cause them.
Best time to post: Fri carries the highest measured engagement of any posting day in the sample at 0.11%. Most sampled posts go out around 01:00 (2 of 11). This is the account's own posting record, not an audience-activity metric — Instagram keeps those private to the owner.

5 post ideas for this account

1.Rebuild the clips that drew 142.9K likes as a series — same structure, new subject, published on Fri.
2.A clips that answers the question the audience keeps asking in comments — the account averages 205 comments a post, so the raw material is already there.
3.A post that ends on an explicit question. The comment-to-like ratio is 0.47%, below the 1–3% healthy band: the audience is scrolling past rather than replying.
4.A behind-the-scenes feed using the same caption discipline already in place (82% of posts carry caption and tags).
5.A recurring weekly slot on Fri, so the 44.2 posts a week become predictable rather than bursty.

Copy as prompt

One self-contained prompt carrying this account's real measured numbers. Paste it into any AI assistant and it will write a 4-week plan specific to this account rather than a generic one.

You are a social media strategist. Here is a public audit of the Instagram
account @9gag (9GAG: Go Fun The World), retrieved 5 Sept 2026.
Sample: 11 public posts.

Audience: 52,035,613 followers, Mega tier.
Engagement rate by followers: 0.08% (peer typical 0.35%, top decile 0.90%).
Average likes 43,599 (median 37,352).
Average comments 205 (median 65).
Comment-to-like ratio: 0.47%.
Posting cadence: 44.2 posts/week, average 0.2 days between posts.
Format mix observed: feed 5/11, clips 4/11, carousel_container 2/11.
Best post drew 3.83x the median post's likes.
Captions with at least one hashtag: 82%.
Most-used hashtag: #9gag (9 of 11 sampled posts).
Strongest measured posting day: Fri at 0.11% engagement.
Most common posting hour: 01:00 local.
Instapect Score 39/100 (F) — Broad Reach, Low Interaction.
Weaknesses: Audience–engagement mismatch.

Using only the numbers above, produce a 4-week content plan for this account:
a weekly posting schedule, the format for each slot, 10 post concepts with
hooks, a caption template, and a hashtag strategy. Be specific to this
account's actual performance pattern. Do not invent metrics.

Free account required

Create a free account to read the full AI action plan, the content plan, post ideas, hashtag strategy and best time to post for this account.

Create a free account Sign in

Methodology & caveats

What this report measures, how, and what it deliberately does not claim.

What this account does not make measurable

1 pinned post was detected at the head of the response and excluded from the content window, leaving 11 of the 12 returned items. Pinned posts hold permanent placement and keep accumulating engagement, and the oldest one manufactures a gap that never happened — so they are excluded from cadence, gaps, regularity, format mix and every average. They still appear in the content leaderboard, badged "Pinned".
The content sample is the 11-item recent-posts window. The reels endpoint reaches further back and covers Reels only, so it is used to enrich matched items with their play count (5 matched) — never to extend the sample, which would inflate the Reel share and corrupt cadence.
7 older Reels outside the content window are shown separately in "Top Reels by plays" with their own window, and are excluded from every average, the format mix and all cadence maths.
Play counts are published public counts shown only where the provider returns them. They are not reach, views or watch time, and none of those are available for a public-profile audit.

KPI definitions

Engagement rate by followers = (average likes + average comments) ÷ followers × 100.
Median engagement rate = the middle post's engagement rate in the sample; robust to viral outliers.
Posting cadence = (sampled posts − 1) ÷ days spanned × 7. Intervals, not posts: n posts span n−1 gaps. Unavailable below 2 posts or a zero-day window.
Instapect Score = 0.35 × Engagement + 0.25 × Engagement Quality + 0.15 × Consistency + 0.15 × Content Performance + 0.10 × Growth Signals, renormalised over the sub-scores that could be measured. Every account is graded against peers in its own follower tier; Audience Reach is reported separately and carries no weight.
Comment-to-like ratio = average comments ÷ average likes × 100. A healthy conversational account sits between 1% and 3%.

Sample, source & limits

11 public posts sampled (11 usable for like-based metrics) · retrieved 5 Sept 2026 · served from the 24-hour cache.
Only lawfully-visible public signals are used: published posts, visible counts, captions, hashtags, mentions and timestamps.
Instapect never reports reach, impressions, audience demographics, Story insights or Reels watch-time. Those are private to the account owner and any tool claiming them for a third party is guessing.
Benchmarks are published industry medians by follower tier and are indicative, not guarantees. Any forward-looking figure is labelled an estimate with its method stated.

Share this score

A ready-to-post card with the Instapect Score, grade and the headline public metrics. Free to download — no account needed.

No card generated for this profile yet.

Cards show only lawfully-visible public metrics and carry the sample size and retrieval date, so anyone who sees one can check the full report.

This report is built only from lawfully-visible public Instagram signals — published posts and visible counts. It contains no reach, impressions, demographics, Story insights or watch-time, because nobody outside the account can see those. Request removal and the report is delisted from the directory, the category hubs and the sitemap.