@yevohka_ profile picture

๐“จ๐“ฎ๐“ฟ๐“ธ๐“ฑ๐“ด๐“ช

@yevohka_

437
Followers
608
Following
12
Posts
77Instapect ScoreB+

Instapect Score

77/100 ยท grade B+ โ€” a performance read, benchmarked against under 5K followers.

Nano tier437 followersAudience Reach18/100Benchmarked against under 5K followers
Engagement rate
25.53%

by followers ยท typical 4.00%

Avg likes
99

median 98

Avg comments
13

median 10

Cadence
1.7

posts / week ยท 4.1 d apart

Comment-to-like
12.90%

healthy band 1โ€“3%

Median ER
24.37%

middle post in the sample

Public-profile audit ยท 12 posts sampled ยท retrieved 8 Sept 2026ยท served from cache

Life with Jesus ๐Ÿค. Love capturing my life.๐ŸŽž๏ธ๐Ÿ“ธ

Profile snapshot

Headline public metrics for @yevohka_, from 12 sampled posts. Averages sit beside medians so one viral post cannot flatter the picture.

Engagement rate

25.53%

(avg likes + avg comments) รท followers ยท median 24.37% ยท under 5K followers

Average likes

99

Median 98 ยท 12 posts with a visible like count

Average comments

13

Median 10 ยท comment-to-like 12.9%

Posting cadence

1.7posts / week

About one post every 4.1 days

How the score was built

The verdict is at the top of the page; this is the reasoning underneath it. Every sub-score prints its own weight and formula โ€” no black box.

Archetype

High-Engagement Community

Both the rate of response and the depth of it are strong โ€” this audience reacts and talks back.

Nominal weights: Engagement 35% ยท Engagement Quality 25% ยท Consistency 15% ยท Content Performance 15% ยท Growth 10%. Audience Reach is context only and carries no weight โ€” every account is graded against peers in its own follower tier ยท composite from 4 of 5 signals โ€” unavailable sub-scores are excluded from both sums, not scored zero

Audience Reach

18 /100

Nano tier

437 followers (under 10K followers). An asset score: how many people this account can reach. It does not move with how well the posts perform.

What this means

Engagement is top-decile for this size

Engagement rate 25.53% is at or above the 8.00% top-decile mark for under 5K followers. Audience responsiveness is the strength of this account, not something it needs to fix.

Performance is genuinely consistent

Median likes (98) are 99% of the average (99). No viral outlier is propping up the average, so every number in this report describes what a typical post actually does โ€” a dependable baseline is a real asset when planning.

Audience Reach

18 /100

437 followers puts this account in the Nano tier (under 10K followers). This is an asset score โ€” how many people the account can reach โ€” and it never moves based on how well the posts perform.

Weight 0% ยท log-scaled followers: L = log10(followers); Lโ‰ค3 โ†’ 5โ€“25, 3<Lโ‰ค6 โ†’ 25 + (L โˆ’ 3) ร— 20, L>6 โ†’ 85 + (L โˆ’ 6) ร— 15, capped 100

log10(437) = 2.64, mapped as 25 + (L โˆ’ 3) ร— 20 across the 1Kโ€“1M range (1K=25, 10K=45, 100K=65, 1M=85, 10M=100).

Engagement

100 /100

Engagement rate 25.53%, at or above the 8.00% top-decile rate for accounts with under 5K followers. Typical is 4.00%.

Weight 35% ยท piecewise-linear percentile curve for under 5K followers: 0%โ†’5, p25 2.00%โ†’30, p50 4.00%โ†’55, p90 8.00%โ†’85, 14.40%โ†’100

Engagement rate 25.53% mapped onto the under 5K followers percentile curve (0%โ†’5, p25 2.00%โ†’30, p50 4.00%โ†’55, p90 8.00%โ†’85), measured across 12 of 12 sampled posts with visible like counts.

Engagement Quality

100 /100

12.90 comments per 100 likes, above the 1โ€“3% healthy band, an unusually conversational audience. A comment costs far more effort than a like, so this ratio measures conversation rather than reach.

Weight 25% ยท comment-to-like ratio = avg comments รท avg likes ร— 100, mapped 0%โ†’5, 0.5%โ†’30, 1.5%โ†’65, 3%โ†’90, โ‰ฅ5%โ†’100

12.90 comments per 100 likes mapped as 0%โ†’5, 0.5%โ†’30, 1.5%โ†’65, 3%โ†’90, โ‰ฅ5%โ†’100.

Consistency

23 /100

Posting cadence 1.72 posts per week, approaching the healthy 3โ€“7 per week band. Gaps between posts vary by 1.71ร— the mean gap of 4.1 days โ€” under 0.5ร— reads as a dependable rhythm.

Weight 15% ยท 60 ร— (1 โˆ’ clamp(stdev(gaps) รท mean(gaps), 0, 1)) + 40 ร— cadence factor (0/wk โ†’ 0, 3/wk โ†’ 1.0, 3โ€“7/wk โ†’ 1.0, 14/wk โ†’ 0.6, โ‰ฅ21/wk โ†’ 0.3)

regularity 0.00 (1 โˆ’ stdev 6.9d รท mean gap 4.1d) and cadence factor 0.57 from 1.7 posts/week (0โ†’0, ramping to 1.0 at 3/wk, flat 1.0 through 7/wk, tapering to 0.6 at 14/wk and 0.3 at 21+/wk).

Content Performance

39 /100

The best post in the window drew 1.6ร— the median post's likes โ€” 1ร— means no post ever breaks out, 3ร— or more means the account reliably produces outliers worth repeating. 8% of sampled posts carry both a caption and at least one hashtag (a well-kept feed is usually above 80%), across 1 distinct format.

Weight 15% ยท 60 ร— upside score (top-post likes รท median likes: 1ร—โ†’30, 2ร—โ†’60, 3ร—โ†’80, โ‰ฅ5ร—โ†’100) + 25 ร— caption-and-hashtag share + 15 ร— format mix (1.0 if โ‰ฅ2 product types, else 0.5)

upside 1.64ร— (top post 160 likes รท median 98) scoring 49, enrichment 0.08 (caption + โ‰ฅ1 hashtag), format mix 0.5 (1 distinct product type).

Growth Signals

Not measurable

Weight 10% ยท clamp(50 + weekly follower growth % ร— 25, 0, 100), where weekly % = (followers now รท followers then โˆ’ 1) ร— 100 รท weeks

This is the first recorded audit of this account, so there is no observation window yet. Instagram publishes no follower history โ€” Instapect measures growth by comparing snapshots it takes itself, and the trend appears from the second audit that is at least 7 days later.

Growth & cadence

Instagram publishes no follower history, so Instapect builds its own: every audit records a snapshot, and the trend below is measured across those snapshots. Everything else here comes from the visible posting record.

Follower growth

This is the first recorded audit of this account, so there is no observation window yet. Instagram publishes no follower history โ€” Instapect measures growth by comparing snapshots it takes itself, and the trend appears from the second audit that is at least 7 days later.

Engagement rate per post (%)

Oldest to newest across the sampled posts. Unit: % of followers.

Likes and comments per post

Unit: absolute interactions per post.

Free account required

Create a free account to see when this account posts and when its audience actually responds โ€” weekday mix and hour-of-day heatmap.

Engagement diagnostics

Averages are easily distorted by one viral post. The median tells you what a typical post actually does โ€” read them side by side.

Average engagement rate

25.53%

Mean of (likes + comments) รท followers

Comment-only engagement rate

2.92%

Comments รท followers ร— 100 โ€” the honest fallback when likes are hidden

Median engagement rate

24.37%

Middle post in the sample

Comment-to-like ratio

12.9%

Higher means more conversational audience

Like-based sample

12of 12 posts

Every sampled post shows its like count. Comment metrics use all 12 posts.

Free account required

Create a free account to see the full engagement distribution โ€” how far the best and worst posts sit from the median.

Content leaderboard

Posts ranked by engagement rate by followers. Pinned posts are shown because a reader will recognise them, but they sit outside the measured window and feed no average, rate or rhythm.

Free account required

Create a free account to see the full content breakdown โ€” every top post with its thumbnail and per-post engagement rate.

Hashtags & mentions

Frequency from captions in the sample, with the average engagement rate of the posts each tag appears on. Association, not causation.

Free account required

Create a free account to see the full hashtag and mention detail, with the engagement associated with each tag.

Action plan

Prioritised by expected impact, written from the measured data above. The advisor sees only the metrics this report could actually compute โ€” never an estimate, never a metric Instagram keeps private.

Free account required

Create a free account to read the full AI action plan, the content plan, post ideas, hashtag strategy and best time to post for this account.

Methodology & caveats

What this report measures, how, and what it deliberately does not claim.

What this account does not make measurable

  • The content sample is the 12-item recent-posts window. The reels endpoint reaches further back and covers Reels only, so it is used to enrich matched items with their play count โ€” never to extend the sample, which would inflate the Reel share and corrupt cadence.
  • 6 older Reels outside the content window are shown separately in "Top Reels by plays" with their own window, and are excluded from every average, the format mix and all cadence maths.
  • Play counts are published public counts shown only where the provider returns them. They are not reach, views or watch time, and none of those are available for a public-profile audit.

KPI definitions

  • Engagement rate by followers = (average likes + average comments) รท followers ร— 100.
  • Median engagement rate = the middle post's engagement rate in the sample; robust to viral outliers.
  • Posting cadence = (sampled posts โˆ’ 1) รท days spanned ร— 7. Intervals, not posts: n posts span nโˆ’1 gaps. Unavailable below 2 posts or a zero-day window.
  • Instapect Score = 0.35 ร— Engagement + 0.25 ร— Engagement Quality + 0.15 ร— Consistency + 0.15 ร— Content Performance + 0.10 ร— Growth Signals, renormalised over the sub-scores that could be measured. Every account is graded against peers in its own follower tier; Audience Reach is reported separately and carries no weight.
  • Comment-to-like ratio = average comments รท average likes ร— 100. A healthy conversational account sits between 1% and 3%.

Sample, source & limits

  • 12 public posts sampled (12 usable for like-based metrics) ยท retrieved 8 Sept 2026 ยท served from the 24-hour cache.
  • Only lawfully-visible public signals are used: published posts, visible counts, captions, hashtags, mentions and timestamps.
  • Instapect never reports reach, impressions, audience demographics, Story insights or Reels watch-time. Those are private to the account owner and any tool claiming them for a third party is guessing.
  • Benchmarks are published industry medians by follower tier and are indicative, not guarantees. Any forward-looking figure is labelled an estimate with its method stated.

Share this score

A ready-to-post card with the Instapect Score, grade and the headline public metrics. Free to download โ€” no account needed.

No card generated for this profile yet.

Cards show only lawfully-visible public metrics and carry the sample size and retrieval date, so anyone who sees one can check the full report.

This report is built only from lawfully-visible public Instagram signals โ€” published posts and visible counts. It contains no reach, impressions, demographics, Story insights or watch-time, because nobody outside the account can see those. Request removal and the report is delisted from the directory, the category hubs and the sitemap.