@vikpellicootto profile picture

@vikpellicootto

@vikpellicootto · Restaurant

5,933
Followers
846
Following
Not published
Posts
42Instapect ScoreD

Instapect Score

42/100 · grade D — a performance read, benchmarked against 5K–25K followers.

Nano tier5,933 followersAudience Reach40/100Benchmarked against 5K–25K followers
Engagement rate
0.31%

by followers · typical 2.80%

Avg likes
12

median 12

Avg comments
6

median 0

Cadence
0.6

posts / week · 11.7 d apart

Comment-to-like
46.17%

healthy band 1–3%

Median ER
0.20%

middle post in the sample

Public-profile audit · 12 posts sampled · retrieved 10 Sept 2026· served from cache

Fine dining at @galleriavikmilano in Galleria Vittorio Emanuele II. Mediterranean cuisine with local ingredients & flavors.

bookingvikpellico8.guestplan.io

Profile snapshot

Headline public metrics for @vikpellicootto, from 12 sampled posts. Averages sit beside medians so one viral post cannot flatter the picture.

Engagement rate

0.31%

(avg likes + avg comments) ÷ followers · median 0.20% · 5K–25K followers

Average likes

12

Median 12 · 11 posts with a visible like count

Average comments

6

Median 0 · comment-to-like 46.2%

Posting cadence

0.6posts / week

About one post every 11.7 days

Latest posts

Newest first · engagement rate by followers per post

7 Sept 2026 · image

Impara a creare Cocktail d’Autore in una location davvero unica. La nostra Mixology Experience è pensata per Team Building, Eventi Aziendali e gruppi di amici, nella cornice esclusiva della Galleria Vittorio Emanuele. Un’esperienza tra mixology, divertimento e uno dei luoghi più esclusivi di Milano. Info e prenotazioni dal link in bio. #teambuilding

6

likes

0

comments

0.10%

ER

4 Sept 2026 · image

Scampo crudo, foie gras scottato, crema di mandorla e gel di ciliegie. Una delle creazioni dello Chef German Bentancur @germanbentancur nel menu di Vik Pellico Otto. Prenota il tuo tavolo dal link in bio e vieni a gustare queste creazioni con vista sulla Galleria Vittorio Emanuele.

8

likes

0

comments

0.13%

ER

5 Aug 2026 · image

Tartare di filetto di Fassona adagiata su midollo, cotto prima a bassa temperatura e poi alla brace, lasciato raffreddare e servito con maionese allo zafferano e misticanza aromatica. Una creazione dello Chef German Bentancur @germanbentancur.

8

likes

0

comments

0.13%

ER

31 Jul 2026 · image

Tagliolini freschi mantecati con una bisque di gamberi e scampi, intensa e vellutata. A completare il piatto, Gambero Rosso crudo, leggermente marinato con olio EVO, scorza di limone e fleur de sel. Una creazione dello Chef German Bentancur @germanbentancur.

13

likes

1

comments

0.24%

ER

29 Jul 2026 · image

Un grande classico italiano, riletto attraverso la sensibilità e la tecnica dello Chef German Bentancur @germanbentancur. Vitello cotto a bassa temperatura, fondo bruno, spuma tonnata e fiori di cappero: un equilibrio che porta la tradizione verso una dimensione contemporanea. Il Vitello Tonnato, secondo Vik Pellico Otto.

10

likes

0

comments

0.17%

ER

20 Jul 2026 · image

La Caprese Vik Pellico Otto, un grande classico reinterpretato con equilibrio e precisione da Chef German Bentancur. Gambero Rosso di Mazara, stracciatella in crema, pomodoro Camone, olio al basilico e una bisque di gambero. Un piatto che racconta l'estate Italiana attraverso tecnica, materia prima e armonia.

7

likes

1

comments

0.13%

ER

How the score was built

The verdict is at the top of the page; this is the reasoning underneath it. Every sub-score prints its own weight and formula — no black box.

Archetype

Developing Profile

No single pattern dominates yet. The sub-scores below show which dimension moves the result most.

Nominal weights: Engagement 35% · Engagement Quality 25% · Consistency 15% · Content Performance 15% · Growth 10%. Audience Reach is context only and carries no weight — every account is graded against peers in its own follower tier · composite from 4 of 5 signals — unavailable sub-scores are excluded from both sums, not scored zero

Audience Reach

40 /100

Nano tier

5,933 followers (under 10K followers). An asset score: how many people this account can reach. It does not move with how well the posts perform.

What this means

Engagement sits in the bottom quartile of its tier

Engagement rate 0.31% is below the 1.40% bottom quartile for 5K–25K followers, where typical is 2.80%. Closing to typical would mean roughly 813% more likes and comments per post at the current follower count.

Posting frequency is the most controllable lever

At 0.60 posts per week — one every 12 days — the account publishes less than once a week. Unlike engagement rate, cadence is entirely within the owner's control, which makes it the cheapest thing on this page to change.

Performance is genuinely consistent

Median likes (12) are 96% of the average (12). No viral outlier is propping up the average, so every number in this report describes what a typical post actually does — a dependable baseline is a real asset when planning.

Audience Reach

40 /100

5,933 followers puts this account in the Nano tier (under 10K followers). This is an asset score — how many people the account can reach — and it never moves based on how well the posts perform.

Weight 0% · log-scaled followers: L = log10(followers); L≤3 → 5–25, 3<L≤6 → 25 + (L − 3) × 20, L>6 → 85 + (L − 6) × 15, capped 100

log10(5,933) = 3.77, mapped as 25 + (L − 3) × 20 across the 1K–1M range (1K=25, 10K=45, 100K=65, 1M=85, 10M=100).

Engagement

10 /100

Engagement rate 0.31%, below the 1.40% bottom quartile for accounts with 5K–25K followers. Typical is 2.80%.

Weight 35% · piecewise-linear percentile curve for 5K–25K followers: 0%→5, p25 1.40%→30, p50 2.80%→55, p90 6.00%→85, 10.80%→100

Engagement rate 0.31% mapped onto the 5K–25K followers percentile curve (0%→5, p25 1.40%→30, p50 2.80%→55, p90 6.00%→85), measured across 11 of 12 sampled posts with visible like counts.

Engagement Quality

100 /100

46.17 comments per 100 likes, above the 1–3% healthy band, an unusually conversational audience. A comment costs far more effort than a like, so this ratio measures conversation rather than reach.

Weight 25% · comment-to-like ratio = avg comments ÷ avg likes × 100, mapped 0%→5, 0.5%→30, 1.5%→65, 3%→90, ≥5%→100

46.17 comments per 100 likes mapped as 0%→5, 0.5%→30, 1.5%→65, 3%→90, ≥5%→100.

Consistency

8 /100

Posting cadence 0.60 posts per week, below the 1-per-week floor most active accounts clear. Gaps between posts vary by 1.14× the mean gap of 11.7 days — under 0.5× reads as a dependable rhythm.

Weight 15% · 60 × (1 − clamp(stdev(gaps) ÷ mean(gaps), 0, 1)) + 40 × cadence factor (0/wk → 0, 3/wk → 1.0, 3–7/wk → 1.0, 14/wk → 0.6, ≥21/wk → 0.3)

regularity 0.00 (1 − stdev 13.4d ÷ mean gap 11.7d) and cadence factor 0.20 from 0.6 posts/week (0→0, ramping to 1.0 at 3/wk, flat 1.0 through 7/wk, tapering to 0.6 at 14/wk and 0.3 at 21+/wk).

Content Performance

53 /100

Breakout upside could not be measured on this sample. 25% of sampled posts carry both a caption and at least one hashtag (a well-kept feed is usually above 80%), across 3 distinct formats.

Weight 15% · 60 × upside score (top-post likes ÷ median likes: 1×→30, 2×→60, 3×→80, ≥5×→100) + 25 × caption-and-hashtag share + 15 × format mix (1.0 if ≥2 product types, else 0.5)

Upside unavailable (the median post draws fewer than 30 visible likes, too thin a base for a breakout ratio); its weight was redistributed. enrichment 0.25 (caption + ≥1 hashtag), format mix 1.0 (3 distinct product types).

Growth Signals

Not measurable

Weight 10% · clamp(50 + weekly follower growth % × 25, 0, 100), where weekly % = (followers now ÷ followers then − 1) × 100 ÷ weeks

This is the first recorded audit of this account, so there is no observation window yet. Instagram publishes no follower history — Instapect measures growth by comparing snapshots it takes itself, and the trend appears from the second audit that is at least 7 days later.

Growth & cadence

Instagram publishes no follower history, so Instapect builds its own: every audit records a snapshot, and the trend below is measured across those snapshots. Everything else here comes from the visible posting record.

Follower growth

This is the first recorded audit of this account, so there is no observation window yet. Instagram publishes no follower history — Instapect measures growth by comparing snapshots it takes itself, and the trend appears from the second audit that is at least 7 days later.

Engagement rate per post (%)

Oldest to newest across the sampled posts. Unit: % of followers.

Likes and comments per post

Unit: absolute interactions per post.

Free account required

Create a free account to see when this account posts and when its audience actually responds — weekday mix and hour-of-day heatmap.

Engagement diagnostics

Averages are easily distorted by one viral post. The median tells you what a typical post actually does — read them side by side.

Average engagement rate

0.31%

Mean of (likes + comments) ÷ followers

Comment-only engagement rate

0.10%

Comments ÷ followers × 100 — the honest fallback when likes are hidden

Median engagement rate

0.20%

Middle post in the sample

Comment-to-like ratio

46.2%

Higher means more conversational audience

Like-based sample

11of 12 posts

1 post hide their like count and are excluded from like-based numbers only — they still count for cadence, format, captions and comments (12 posts).

Free account required

Create a free account to see the full engagement distribution — how far the best and worst posts sit from the median.

Content leaderboard

Posts ranked by engagement rate by followers. Pinned posts are shown because a reader will recognise them, but they sit outside the measured window and feed no average, rate or rhythm.

Free account required

Create a free account to see the full content breakdown — every top post with its thumbnail and per-post engagement rate.

Hashtags & mentions

Frequency from captions in the sample, with the average engagement rate of the posts each tag appears on. Association, not causation.

Free account required

Create a free account to see the full hashtag and mention detail, with the engagement associated with each tag.

Action plan

Prioritised by expected impact, written from the measured data above. The advisor sees only the metrics this report could actually compute — never an estimate, never a metric Instagram keeps private.

Free account required

Create a free account to read the full AI action plan, the content plan, post ideas, hashtag strategy and best time to post for this account.

Methodology & caveats

What this report measures, how, and what it deliberately does not claim.

What this account does not make measurable

  • 1 of 12 sampled posts hide their like count. They stay in the sample for cadence, format, caption and comment metrics, and are excluded only from like-based ones, which are computed from 11 posts.
  • The content sample is the 12-item recent-posts window. The reels endpoint reaches further back and covers Reels only, so it is used to enrich matched items with their play count (1 matched) — never to extend the sample, which would inflate the Reel share and corrupt cadence.
  • 11 older Reels outside the content window are shown separately in "Top Reels by plays" with their own window, and are excluded from every average, the format mix and all cadence maths.
  • Play counts are published public counts shown only where the provider returns them. They are not reach, views or watch time, and none of those are available for a public-profile audit.

KPI definitions

  • Engagement rate by followers = (average likes + average comments) ÷ followers × 100.
  • Median engagement rate = the middle post's engagement rate in the sample; robust to viral outliers.
  • Posting cadence = (sampled posts − 1) ÷ days spanned × 7. Intervals, not posts: n posts span n−1 gaps. Unavailable below 2 posts or a zero-day window.
  • Instapect Score = 0.35 × Engagement + 0.25 × Engagement Quality + 0.15 × Consistency + 0.15 × Content Performance + 0.10 × Growth Signals, renormalised over the sub-scores that could be measured. Every account is graded against peers in its own follower tier; Audience Reach is reported separately and carries no weight.
  • Comment-to-like ratio = average comments ÷ average likes × 100. A healthy conversational account sits between 1% and 3%.

Sample, source & limits

  • 12 public posts sampled (11 usable for like-based metrics) · retrieved 10 Sept 2026 · served from the 24-hour cache.
  • Only lawfully-visible public signals are used: published posts, visible counts, captions, hashtags, mentions and timestamps.
  • Instapect never reports reach, impressions, audience demographics, Story insights or Reels watch-time. Those are private to the account owner and any tool claiming them for a third party is guessing.
  • Benchmarks are published industry medians by follower tier and are indicative, not guarantees. Any forward-looking figure is labelled an estimate with its method stated.

Share this score

A ready-to-post card with the Instapect Score, grade and the headline public metrics. Free to download — no account needed.

No card generated for this profile yet.

Cards show only lawfully-visible public metrics and carry the sample size and retrieval date, so anyone who sees one can check the full report.

This report is built only from lawfully-visible public Instagram signals — published posts and visible counts. It contains no reach, impressions, demographics, Story insights or watch-time, because nobody outside the account can see those. Request removal and the report is delisted from the directory, the category hubs and the sitemap.