@sylvamphoto profile picture

@sylvamphoto

@sylvamphoto

418
Followers
464
Following
Not published
Posts
45Instapect ScoreD+

Instapect Score

45/100 · grade D+ — a performance read, benchmarked against under 5K followers.

Nano tier418 followersAudience Reach17/100Benchmarked against under 5K followers
Engagement rate
4.07%

by followers · typical 4.00%

Avg likes
17

median 17

Avg comments
0

median 0

Cadence
Not measurable

posts / week

Comment-to-like
0.00%

healthy band 1–3%

Median ER
4.07%

middle post in the sample

Public-profile audit · 1 posts sampled (11 pinned excluded) · retrieved 12 Sept 2026· served from cache

📸 Un projet pro ou perso ? Plus que des portraits, une expérience qui te révèle ✨ Âmes sensibles ne pas s’abstenir ! 💌 | Réservation en DM

sylvaniemonteiro.myportfolio.com/

Profile snapshot

Headline public metrics for @sylvamphoto, from 1 sampled posts. Averages sit beside medians so one viral post cannot flatter the picture.

Engagement rate

4.07%

(avg likes + avg comments) ÷ followers · median 4.07% · under 5K followers

Average likes

17

Median 17 · 1 posts with a visible like count

Average comments

0

Median 0 · comment-to-like 0.0%

Posting cadence

posts / week

Not measurable from this sample

Latest posts

Newest first · engagement rate by followers per post

7 Sept 2026 · carousel

S’inspirer de l’univers d’une illustratrice pour imaginer des portraits autrement 🎨 Jenn, de la peinture, un saule pleureur et l’envie de créer des images poétiques, pensées pour révèler les univers créatifs. Et si tes portraits pro pouvaient montrer bien plus que ton métier ? Écris-moi pour créer ensemble des images qui racontent qui tu es ☀️ @jenn_u_photographie

Pinned · outside the measured window

18

likes

2

comments

4.78%

ER

4 Sept 2026 · carousel

Avant/Après la retouche ! Tu en penses quoi ? Dis-le moi en commentaire

Pinned · outside the measured window

35

likes

4

comments

9.33%

ER

31 Aug 2026 · carousel

Shooting plage dorée ✨ Partie 2 | Face à la mer Après les dunes, direction le bord de l'eau pour la suite de ce shooting. Une ambiance complètement différente, avec la lumière dorée et l'océan en fond 🌊 Trop hâte d’avoir ton avis sur cette deuxième partie ! Dis-moi ce que tu en penses en commentaire 🫶🏼

Pinned · outside the measured window

69

likes

8

comments

18.42%

ER

17 Aug 2026 · carousel

Shooting plage dorée ✨ Partie 1 | Dans les dunes Trop hâte d'avoir ton avis sur ce projet ! Dis-nous ce que tu en penses en commentaire 🫶🏼 Coiffure : @segolook Make-up : @arcachonpylamakeup Modèle : @mllecafrine_modele Photographe : @sylvamphoto

Pinned · outside the measured window

139

likes

31

comments

40.67%

ER

14 Aug 2026 · carousel

Tu as déjà hésité à réserver un shooting pro en te disant : « Mes photos de vacances ou un selfie sympa, ça peut faire l’affaire » ? 🙈 Je comprends, mais quand tu développes ton activité, tes photos sont souvent la première chose que les gens voient de toi. Avoir des images qui te ressemblent, qui montrent ton univers et dans lesquelles tu te sens bien, ça peut vraiment changer la façon dont tu présentes ton activité. Dans ce carrousel, je te partage 3 raisons de faire des portraits pro. Laquelle te parle le plus ? Dis-le moi en commentaire ! Et si tu as envie de créer des photos qui te ressemblent, viens m’écrire en DM !

Pinned · outside the measured window

6

likes

0

comments

1.44%

ER

24 Jul 2026 · reel

Dorée, en contre-jour ou diffuse… Chaque lumière apporte une émotion différente. Laquelle tu préfères ? ✨

Pinned · outside the measured window

10

likes

0

comments

2.39%

ER

How the score was built

The verdict is at the top of the page; this is the reasoning underneath it. Every sub-score prints its own weight and formula — no black box.

Archetype

Developing Profile

No single pattern dominates yet. The sub-scores below show which dimension moves the result most.

Nominal weights: Engagement 35% · Engagement Quality 25% · Consistency 15% · Content Performance 15% · Growth 10%. Audience Reach is context only and carries no weight — every account is graded against peers in its own follower tier · composite from 2 of 5 signals — unavailable sub-scores are excluded from both sums, not scored zero

Audience Reach

17 /100

Nano tier

418 followers (under 10K followers). An asset score: how many people this account can reach. It does not move with how well the posts perform.

What this means

Performance is genuinely consistent

Median likes (17) are 100% of the average (17). No viral outlier is propping up the average, so every number in this report describes what a typical post actually does — a dependable baseline is a real asset when planning.

Audience Reach

17 /100

418 followers puts this account in the Nano tier (under 10K followers). This is an asset score — how many people the account can reach — and it never moves based on how well the posts perform.

Weight 0% · log-scaled followers: L = log10(followers); L≤3 → 5–25, 3<L≤6 → 25 + (L − 3) × 20, L>6 → 85 + (L − 6) × 15, capped 100

log10(418) = 2.62, mapped as 25 + (L − 3) × 20 across the 1K–1M range (1K=25, 10K=45, 100K=65, 1M=85, 10M=100).

Engagement

56 /100

Engagement rate 4.07%, above the 4.00% typical rate for accounts with under 5K followers. Typical is 4.00%.

Weight 35% · piecewise-linear percentile curve for under 5K followers: 0%→5, p25 2.00%→30, p50 4.00%→55, p90 8.00%→85, 14.40%→100

Engagement rate 4.07% mapped onto the under 5K followers percentile curve (0%→5, p25 2.00%→30, p50 4.00%→55, p90 8.00%→85), measured across 1 of 1 sampled posts with visible like counts.

Engagement Quality

Not measurable

Weight 25% · comment-to-like ratio = avg comments ÷ avg likes × 100, mapped 0%→5, 0.5%→30, 1.5%→65, 3%→90, ≥5%→100

The typical post carries 0 comments, below the 5-comment base at which a comment-to-like ratio is statistically meaningful. One or two reactions expressed as a percentage is not a measurement, so the weight is redistributed rather than scored.

Consistency

Not measurable

Weight 15% · 60 × (1 − clamp(stdev(gaps) ÷ mean(gaps), 0, 1)) + 40 × cadence factor (0/wk → 0, 3/wk → 1.0, 3–7/wk → 1.0, 14/wk → 0.6, ≥21/wk → 0.3)

The content window holds fewer than three posts, so gap variability cannot be distinguished from a single interval and neither regularity nor cadence is meaningful.

Content Performance

19 /100

Breakout upside could not be measured on this sample. 0% of sampled posts carry both a caption and at least one hashtag (a well-kept feed is usually above 80%), across 1 distinct format.

Weight 15% · 60 × upside score (top-post likes ÷ median likes: 1×→30, 2×→60, 3×→80, ≥5×→100) + 25 × caption-and-hashtag share + 15 × format mix (1.0 if ≥2 product types, else 0.5)

Upside unavailable (fewer than 3 visible-like posts); its weight was redistributed. enrichment 0.00 (caption + ≥1 hashtag), format mix 0.5 (1 distinct product type).

Growth Signals

Not measurable

Weight 10% · clamp(50 + weekly follower growth % × 25, 0, 100), where weekly % = (followers now ÷ followers then − 1) × 100 ÷ weeks

This is the first recorded audit of this account, so there is no observation window yet. Instagram publishes no follower history — Instapect measures growth by comparing snapshots it takes itself, and the trend appears from the second audit that is at least 7 days later.

Growth & cadence

Instagram publishes no follower history, so Instapect builds its own: every audit records a snapshot, and the trend below is measured across those snapshots. Everything else here comes from the visible posting record.

Follower growth

This is the first recorded audit of this account, so there is no observation window yet. Instagram publishes no follower history — Instapect measures growth by comparing snapshots it takes itself, and the trend appears from the second audit that is at least 7 days later.

Engagement rate per post (%)

Oldest to newest across the sampled posts. Unit: % of followers.

Likes and comments per post

Unit: absolute interactions per post.

Free account required

Create a free account to see when this account posts and when its audience actually responds — weekday mix and hour-of-day heatmap.

Engagement diagnostics

Averages are easily distorted by one viral post. The median tells you what a typical post actually does — read them side by side.

Average engagement rate

4.07%

Mean of (likes + comments) ÷ followers

Comment-only engagement rate

0.00%

Comments ÷ followers × 100 — the honest fallback when likes are hidden

Median engagement rate

4.07%

Middle post in the sample

Comment-to-like ratio

0.0%

Higher means more conversational audience

Like-based sample

1of 1 posts

Every sampled post shows its like count. Comment metrics use all 1 posts.

Free account required

Create a free account to see the full engagement distribution — how far the best and worst posts sit from the median.

Content leaderboard

Posts ranked by engagement rate by followers. Pinned posts are shown because a reader will recognise them, but they sit outside the measured window and feed no average, rate or rhythm.

Free account required

Create a free account to see the full content breakdown — every top post with its thumbnail and per-post engagement rate.

Hashtags & mentions

Frequency from captions in the sample, with the average engagement rate of the posts each tag appears on. Association, not causation.

Free account required

Create a free account to see the full hashtag and mention detail, with the engagement associated with each tag.

Action plan

Prioritised by expected impact, written from the measured data above. The advisor sees only the metrics this report could actually compute — never an estimate, never a metric Instagram keeps private.

Free account required

Create a free account to read the full AI action plan, the content plan, post ideas, hashtag strategy and best time to post for this account.

Methodology & caveats

What this report measures, how, and what it deliberately does not claim.

What this account does not make measurable

  • 11 pinned posts were detected at the head of the response and excluded from the content window, leaving 1 of the 12 returned items. Pinned posts hold permanent placement and keep accumulating engagement, and the oldest one manufactures a gap that never happened — so they are excluded from cadence, gaps, regularity, format mix and every average. They still appear in the content leaderboard, badged "Pinned".
  • The content sample is the 1-item recent-posts window. The reels endpoint reaches further back and covers Reels only, so it is used to enrich matched items with their play count (2 matched) — never to extend the sample, which would inflate the Reel share and corrupt cadence.
  • 10 older Reels outside the content window are shown separately in "Top Reels by plays" with their own window, and are excluded from every average, the format mix and all cadence maths.
  • Play counts are published public counts shown only where the provider returns them. They are not reach, views or watch time, and none of those are available for a public-profile audit.

KPI definitions

  • Engagement rate by followers = (average likes + average comments) ÷ followers × 100.
  • Median engagement rate = the middle post's engagement rate in the sample; robust to viral outliers.
  • Posting cadence = (sampled posts − 1) ÷ days spanned × 7. Intervals, not posts: n posts span n−1 gaps. Unavailable below 2 posts or a zero-day window.
  • Instapect Score = 0.35 × Engagement + 0.25 × Engagement Quality + 0.15 × Consistency + 0.15 × Content Performance + 0.10 × Growth Signals, renormalised over the sub-scores that could be measured. Every account is graded against peers in its own follower tier; Audience Reach is reported separately and carries no weight.
  • Comment-to-like ratio = average comments ÷ average likes × 100. A healthy conversational account sits between 1% and 3%.

Sample, source & limits

  • 1 public posts sampled (1 usable for like-based metrics) · retrieved 12 Sept 2026 · served from the 24-hour cache.
  • Only lawfully-visible public signals are used: published posts, visible counts, captions, hashtags, mentions and timestamps.
  • Instapect never reports reach, impressions, audience demographics, Story insights or Reels watch-time. Those are private to the account owner and any tool claiming them for a third party is guessing.
  • Benchmarks are published industry medians by follower tier and are indicative, not guarantees. Any forward-looking figure is labelled an estimate with its method stated.

Share this score

A ready-to-post card with the Instapect Score, grade and the headline public metrics. Free to download — no account needed.

No card generated for this profile yet.

Cards show only lawfully-visible public metrics and carry the sample size and retrieval date, so anyone who sees one can check the full report.

This report is built only from lawfully-visible public Instagram signals — published posts and visible counts. It contains no reach, impressions, demographics, Story insights or watch-time, because nobody outside the account can see those. Request removal and the report is delisted from the directory, the category hubs and the sitemap.