@shilpa_tanguturu profile picture

@shilpa_tanguturu Verified

@shilpa_tanguturu · Clothing (Brand)

18.2K
Followers
6
Following
Not published
Posts
64Instapect ScoreC+

Instapect Score

64/100 · grade C+ — a performance read, benchmarked against 5K–25K followers.

Micro tier18.2K followersAudience Reach50/100Benchmarked against 5K–25K followers
Engagement rate
2.04%

by followers · typical 2.80%

Avg likes
358

median 65

Avg comments
15

median 2

Cadence
2.4

posts / week · 2.9 d apart

Comment-to-like
4.15%

healthy band 1–3%

Median ER
0.37%

middle post in the sample

Public-profile audit · 12 posts sampled · retrieved 9 Sept 2026· served from cache

Design what I live 🍂 You can also find us at @house_of_vandy @pinkphoolindia By:@tanguturushilpa Hyderabad +91 90590 70303

shilpas.co.in/collections/avani

Profile snapshot

Headline public metrics for @shilpa_tanguturu, from 12 sampled posts. Averages sit beside medians so one viral post cannot flatter the picture.

Engagement rate

2.04%

(avg likes + avg comments) ÷ followers · median 0.37% · 5K–25K followers

Average likes

358

Median 65 · 11 posts with a visible like count

Average comments

15

Median 2 · comment-to-like 4.1%

Posting cadence

2.4posts / week

About one post every 2.9 days

Latest posts

Newest first · engagement rate by followers per post

1 Sept 2026 · carousel

A little more of what’s waiting for you at Tharangam. Shilpas Sustainable and thoughtfully designed clothing that brings together effortless style and a greener way of living. Radya Label Handpicked ethnic wear and dresses that beautifully blend traditional details with a modern aesthetic. Pooja Varma Penmetsa Telugu stories and relatable words that celebrate everyday life, culture, and the little moments that matter. Neyahhmeraki Natural perfumes, floral waters, and handcrafted creations that draw inspiration from nature and Indian traditions. Come explore, connect, and find something you love at Tharangam. Sep 4th & 5th 📍 Vana Convention, Gandipet 🎟️ Register now #tharangam2026 #tharangambychapter30 #chapter30 #fleamarket #hyderabadevent

Hidden

likes

0

comments

ER

27 Aug 2026 · reel

Currently crushing on this little lilac moment ❣️❣️

18

likes

0

comments

0.10%

ER

27 Aug 2026 · carousel

Some days just look better in lilac ❣️

65

likes

2

comments

0.37%

ER

24 Aug 2026 · reel

Nonsense Curry X Shilpa Tanguturu Hey there stellar beings, happy Monday! We're coming in HOT today with a Mati fabric Saree which is handwoven and sourced from a small village in Andhra Pradesh called Pondhuru. With a Blouse design that is inspired by a blooming flower. When we speak to the Founders of all the Homegrown brands we feature on our platform, we love it when we hear the passion in conversation about their brand identity. This is how we selectively pick the labels we work with. There's heart, intention. The same goes with @shilpa_tanguturu , who was so ecstatic to see us and i quote "flexing for our label". Her platfoms is a point of view on how we choose to dress. It sits at the intersection of Indian craft, modern silhouettes, conscious living and personal expression. It doesn’t want to look traditionally “handloom” just for the sake of it. It takes things that are deeply Indian—Khadi, Kala cotton, hand embroidery, natural dyes, regional techniques—and gives them a quieter, contemporary language The Amari set is so versatile that we created two looks from the set. In the first style, we wore the set as is and accessorized taking inspiration from the colors of the garment. A fluffy scrunchie, tear drop earrings, pearls and my 'getting ready' wedding slippers. The saree feels like a loving embrace and the color is just the most placid shade of purple. What I love about the fabric is that it molds with your body. Our second look is a contemporary style, again taking inspiration from the texture of the blouse, adding In more texture with a shaggy shrug. Since its a more Alternative look, we went with silver accessories, a complete contrast to the first, which goes to show that any one garment has the potential to be worn in so many different possibilities. #explorepage #saree #style #sustainablefashion #sareelovers

1,579

likes

89

comments

9.15%

ER

22 Aug 2026 · reel

When our muse understands the assignment ..✨ Shilpa’s is all about Rewear Restyle Repeat 🍂🌸

25

likes

4

comments

0.16%

ER

18 Aug 2026 · carousel

Because picking just one Shilpa’s look? Impossible 😁🧿❣️

73

likes

8

comments

0.44%

ER

How the score was built

The verdict is at the top of the page; this is the reasoning underneath it. Every sub-score prints its own weight and formula — no black box.

Archetype

Breakout Creator

Produces outliers well above its own baseline. The best posts are a template, not luck.

Nominal weights: Engagement 35% · Engagement Quality 25% · Consistency 15% · Content Performance 15% · Growth 10%. Audience Reach is context only and carries no weight — every account is graded against peers in its own follower tier · composite from 4 of 5 signals — unavailable sub-scores are excluded from both sums, not scored zero

Audience Reach

50 /100

Micro tier

18,237 followers (10K–100K followers). An asset score: how many people this account can reach. It does not move with how well the posts perform.

What this means

A few posts carry the average

Median likes (65) are only 18% of the average (358), so a small number of strong posts is lifting the mean. Read the median as the typical result and treat the outliers as a template worth repeating.

Audience Reach

50 /100

18,237 followers puts this account in the Micro tier (10K–100K followers). This is an asset score — how many people the account can reach — and it never moves based on how well the posts perform.

Weight 0% · log-scaled followers: L = log10(followers); L≤3 → 5–25, 3<L≤6 → 25 + (L − 3) × 20, L>6 → 85 + (L − 6) × 15, capped 100

log10(18,237) = 4.26, mapped as 25 + (L − 3) × 20 across the 1K–1M range (1K=25, 10K=45, 100K=65, 1M=85, 10M=100).

Engagement

41 /100

Engagement rate 2.04%, between the 1.40% bottom quartile and the 2.80% typical rate for accounts with 5K–25K followers. Typical is 2.80%.

Weight 35% · piecewise-linear percentile curve for 5K–25K followers: 0%→5, p25 1.40%→30, p50 2.80%→55, p90 6.00%→85, 10.80%→100

Engagement rate 2.04% mapped onto the 5K–25K followers percentile curve (0%→5, p25 1.40%→30, p50 2.80%→55, p90 6.00%→85), measured across 11 of 12 sampled posts with visible like counts.

Engagement Quality

96 /100

4.15 comments per 100 likes, above the 1–3% healthy band, an unusually conversational audience. A comment costs far more effort than a like, so this ratio measures conversation rather than reach.

Weight 25% · comment-to-like ratio = avg comments ÷ avg likes × 100, mapped 0%→5, 0.5%→30, 1.5%→65, 3%→90, ≥5%→100

4.15 comments per 100 likes mapped as 0%→5, 0.5%→30, 1.5%→65, 3%→90, ≥5%→100.

Consistency

48 /100

Posting cadence 2.41 posts per week, approaching the healthy 3–7 per week band. Gaps between posts vary by 0.73× the mean gap of 2.9 days — under 0.5× reads as a dependable rhythm.

Weight 15% · 60 × (1 − clamp(stdev(gaps) ÷ mean(gaps), 0, 1)) + 40 × cadence factor (0/wk → 0, 3/wk → 1.0, 3–7/wk → 1.0, 14/wk → 0.6, ≥21/wk → 0.3)

regularity 0.27 (1 − stdev 2.1d ÷ mean gap 2.9d) and cadence factor 0.80 from 2.4 posts/week (0→0, ramping to 1.0 at 3/wk, flat 1.0 through 7/wk, tapering to 0.6 at 14/wk and 0.3 at 21+/wk).

Content Performance

81 /100

The best post in the window drew 5.0× the median post's likes — 1× means no post ever breaks out, 3× or more means the account reliably produces outliers worth repeating. 25% of sampled posts carry both a caption and at least one hashtag (a well-kept feed is usually above 80%), across 2 distinct formats.

Weight 15% · 60 × upside score (top-post likes ÷ median likes: 1×→30, 2×→60, 3×→80, ≥5×→100) + 25 × caption-and-hashtag share + 15 × format mix (1.0 if ≥2 product types, else 0.5)

upside 5.00× (top post 1,901 likes ÷ median 65) scoring 100, enrichment 0.25 (caption + ≥1 hashtag), format mix 1.0 (2 distinct product types).

Growth Signals

Not measurable

Weight 10% · clamp(50 + weekly follower growth % × 25, 0, 100), where weekly % = (followers now ÷ followers then − 1) × 100 ÷ weeks

This is the first recorded audit of this account, so there is no observation window yet. Instagram publishes no follower history — Instapect measures growth by comparing snapshots it takes itself, and the trend appears from the second audit that is at least 7 days later.

Growth & cadence

Instagram publishes no follower history, so Instapect builds its own: every audit records a snapshot, and the trend below is measured across those snapshots. Everything else here comes from the visible posting record.

Follower growth

This is the first recorded audit of this account, so there is no observation window yet. Instagram publishes no follower history — Instapect measures growth by comparing snapshots it takes itself, and the trend appears from the second audit that is at least 7 days later.

Engagement rate per post (%)

Oldest to newest across the sampled posts. Unit: % of followers.

Likes and comments per post

Unit: absolute interactions per post.

Free account required

Create a free account to see when this account posts and when its audience actually responds — weekday mix and hour-of-day heatmap.

Engagement diagnostics

Averages are easily distorted by one viral post. The median tells you what a typical post actually does — read them side by side.

Average engagement rate

2.04%

Mean of (likes + comments) ÷ followers

Comment-only engagement rate

0.08%

Comments ÷ followers × 100 — the honest fallback when likes are hidden

Median engagement rate

0.37%

Middle post in the sample

Comment-to-like ratio

4.1%

Higher means more conversational audience

Like-based sample

11of 12 posts

1 post hide their like count and are excluded from like-based numbers only — they still count for cadence, format, captions and comments (12 posts).

Free account required

Create a free account to see the full engagement distribution — how far the best and worst posts sit from the median.

Content leaderboard

Posts ranked by engagement rate by followers. Pinned posts are shown because a reader will recognise them, but they sit outside the measured window and feed no average, rate or rhythm.

Free account required

Create a free account to see the full content breakdown — every top post with its thumbnail and per-post engagement rate.

Hashtags & mentions

Frequency from captions in the sample, with the average engagement rate of the posts each tag appears on. Association, not causation.

Free account required

Create a free account to see the full hashtag and mention detail, with the engagement associated with each tag.

Action plan

Prioritised by expected impact, written from the measured data above. The advisor sees only the metrics this report could actually compute — never an estimate, never a metric Instagram keeps private.

Free account required

Create a free account to read the full AI action plan, the content plan, post ideas, hashtag strategy and best time to post for this account.

Methodology & caveats

What this report measures, how, and what it deliberately does not claim.

What this account does not make measurable

  • 1 of 12 sampled posts hide their like count. They stay in the sample for cadence, format, caption and comment metrics, and are excluded only from like-based ones, which are computed from 11 posts.
  • The content sample is the 12-item recent-posts window. The reels endpoint reaches further back and covers Reels only, so it is used to enrich matched items with their play count (4 matched) — never to extend the sample, which would inflate the Reel share and corrupt cadence.
  • 8 older Reels outside the content window are shown separately in "Top Reels by plays" with their own window, and are excluded from every average, the format mix and all cadence maths.
  • Play counts are published public counts shown only where the provider returns them. They are not reach, views or watch time, and none of those are available for a public-profile audit.

KPI definitions

  • Engagement rate by followers = (average likes + average comments) ÷ followers × 100.
  • Median engagement rate = the middle post's engagement rate in the sample; robust to viral outliers.
  • Posting cadence = (sampled posts − 1) ÷ days spanned × 7. Intervals, not posts: n posts span n−1 gaps. Unavailable below 2 posts or a zero-day window.
  • Instapect Score = 0.35 × Engagement + 0.25 × Engagement Quality + 0.15 × Consistency + 0.15 × Content Performance + 0.10 × Growth Signals, renormalised over the sub-scores that could be measured. Every account is graded against peers in its own follower tier; Audience Reach is reported separately and carries no weight.
  • Comment-to-like ratio = average comments ÷ average likes × 100. A healthy conversational account sits between 1% and 3%.

Sample, source & limits

  • 12 public posts sampled (11 usable for like-based metrics) · retrieved 9 Sept 2026 · served from the 24-hour cache.
  • Only lawfully-visible public signals are used: published posts, visible counts, captions, hashtags, mentions and timestamps.
  • Instapect never reports reach, impressions, audience demographics, Story insights or Reels watch-time. Those are private to the account owner and any tool claiming them for a third party is guessing.
  • Benchmarks are published industry medians by follower tier and are indicative, not guarantees. Any forward-looking figure is labelled an estimate with its method stated.

Share this score

A ready-to-post card with the Instapect Score, grade and the headline public metrics. Free to download — no account needed.

No card generated for this profile yet.

Cards show only lawfully-visible public metrics and carry the sample size and retrieval date, so anyone who sees one can check the full report.

This report is built only from lawfully-visible public Instagram signals — published posts and visible counts. It contains no reach, impressions, demographics, Story insights or watch-time, because nobody outside the account can see those. Request removal and the report is delisted from the directory, the category hubs and the sitemap.