Instapect
Sign inCreate account
@sevenbutterfly07 profile picture

@sevenbutterfly07

@sevenbutterfly07 · Editor

5,265
Followers
681
Following
Not published
Posts
56Instapect ScoreC

Instapect Score

56/100 · grade C — a performance read, benchmarked against 5K–25K followers.

Nano tier5,265 followersAudience Reach39/100Benchmarked against 5K–25K followers
Engagement rate
340.41%

by followers · typical 2.80%

Avg likes
17.9K

median 17.9K

Avg comments
22

median 9

Cadence
1.5

posts / week · 4.7 d apart

Comment-to-like
0.12%

healthy band 1–3%

Median ER
341.60%

middle post in the sample

Public-profile audit · 11 posts sampled (1 pinned excluded) · retrieved 10 Sept 2026· served from cache

𝗢𝗡𝗟𝗬 𝗕𝗔𝗡𝗚𝗧𝗔𝗡⁷ ♡ 𝘓𝘪𝘧𝘦 𝘪𝘴 𝘴𝘰𝘶𝘱 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘪'𝘮 𝘢 𝘧𝘰𝘳𝘬 *ᴺᵒᵗ ʳᵉᵖʳᵉˢᵉⁿᵗⁱⁿᵍ ᵃⁿʸᵒⁿᵉ*

Profile snapshot

Headline public metrics for @sevenbutterfly07, from 11 sampled posts. Averages sit beside medians so one viral post cannot flatter the picture.

Engagement rate

340.41%

(avg likes + avg comments) ÷ followers · median 341.60% · 5K–25K followers

Average likes

17.9K

Median 17.9K · 2 posts with a visible like count

Average comments

22

Median 9 · comment-to-like 0.1%

Posting cadence

1.5posts / week

About one post every 4.7 days

Latest posts

Newest first · engagement rate by followers per post

9 Sept 2026 · carousel

Me and my twin will be vibing bette than anyone else bruh ⋆˚꩜｡ ⋆˚꩜｡ ⋆˚꩜｡ ⋆˚꩜｡ #jin #jungkook #jinkook #duos #bts You + me = them ⋆˚꩜｡ ⋆˚꩜｡ ⋆˚꩜｡ ⋆˚꩜｡ #fypppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppp #explorepage✨ #feed #post #statics

Hidden

likes

3

comments

—

ER

6 Sept 2026 · image

𝖬𝗒 𝗁𝗈𝗆𝖾⁷ 🥹🫶🏻 ⋆˚꩜｡ ⋆˚꩜｡ ⋆˚꩜｡ ⋆˚꩜｡ #btsot7 #btspavedtheway #bts #feed #exploremore feed fyp bts home la

Hidden

likes

3

comments

—

ER

5 Sept 2026 · carousel

And im in love him ๋࣭ ⭑⚝ ⋆˚꩜｡ ⋆˚꩜｡ ⋆˚꩜｡ ⋆˚꩜｡ #jimin #parkji̇mi̇n #jiminie #jm #explorepage He said he love ocean now i look for him in every wave 𑣲⋆ ⋆˚꩜｡ ⋆˚꩜｡ ⋆˚꩜｡ ⋆˚꩜｡ #feed #viralpost #fyp #explorepage✨ #jimin

Hidden

likes

6

comments

—

ER

26 Aug 2026 · image

𝙰𝚗𝚍 𝚘𝚗𝚎 𝚍𝚊𝚢 𝚒𝚝 𝚠𝚒𝚕𝚕 𝚋𝚎 𝚖𝚘𝚛𝚎 𝚝𝚑𝚊𝚗 𝚘𝚔𝚊𝚢. 𝚃𝚑𝚊𝚝 𝚍𝚊𝚢, 𝚊𝚕𝚕 𝚛𝚊𝚒𝚜𝚎𝚍 𝚏𝚒𝚗𝚐𝚎𝚛𝚜 𝚠𝚒𝚕𝚕 𝚝𝚞𝚛𝚗 𝚒𝚗𝚝𝚘 𝚑𝚊𝚗𝚍𝚜 𝚘𝚏 𝚕𝚘𝚟𝚎. .☘︎ ݁˖ ˚˖𓍢ִ໋❀ 𝙰𝚗𝚍 𝙸’𝚖 𝚊𝚕𝚠𝚊𝚢𝚜 𝚐𝚘𝚗𝚗𝚊 𝚕𝚘𝚟𝚎 𝚢𝚘𝚞 𝚗𝚘 𝚖𝚊𝚝𝚝𝚎𝚛 𝚠𝚑𝚊𝚝. ♡ ♡ ♡ #namseok #bts #namjoon #jhope #everythingwillbeokay feed fyp explorepage snooze futuregonnabeokay

Hidden

likes

5

comments

—

ER

23 Aug 2026 · image

Me and @taecypher.7 cause not only vibe we match fully🫶🏻 ⋆˚꩜｡ ♡ ♡ ♡ #jin #suga #yoonjin #feed #twins explore fyp

Hidden

likes

9

comments

—

ER

22 Aug 2026 · carousel

comfort person is someone who makes you feel happy and safe whenever you see them. They give you so much comfort. The person who saved you.<3 and its gonna be you @rkive ᥫ᭡. ᥫ᭡. ᥫ᭡. ᥫ᭡. #namjoon #fypppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppp #joonie #bts #explorepage✨ All i need is @rkive 🖐🏻 ᥫ᭡. ᥫ᭡. ᥫ᭡. #cute #kimnamjoon #rkive #rmbts #viralpost

Hidden

likes

12

comments

—

ER

How the score was built

The verdict is at the top of the page; this is the reasoning underneath it. Every sub-score prints its own weight and formula — no black box.

Archetype

Developing Profile

No single pattern dominates yet. The sub-scores below show which dimension moves the result most.

Nominal weights: Engagement 35% · Engagement Quality 25% · Consistency 15% · Content Performance 15% · Growth 10%. Audience Reach is context only and carries no weight — every account is graded against peers in its own follower tier · composite from 4 of 5 signals — unavailable sub-scores are excluded from both sums, not scored zero

Audience Reach

39 /100

Nano tier

5,265 followers (under 10K followers). An asset score: how many people this account can reach. It does not move with how well the posts perform.

What this means

Engagement is top-decile for this size

Engagement rate 340.41% is at or above the 6.00% top-decile mark for 5K–25K followers. Audience responsiveness is the strength of this account, not something it needs to fix.

Performance is genuinely consistent

Median likes (17,901) are 100% of the average (17,901). No viral outlier is propping up the average, so every number in this report describes what a typical post actually does — a dependable baseline is a real asset when planning.

Audience Reach

39 /100

5,265 followers puts this account in the Nano tier (under 10K followers). This is an asset score — how many people the account can reach — and it never moves based on how well the posts perform.

Weight 0% · log-scaled followers: L = log10(followers); L≤3 → 5–25, 3<L≤6 → 25 + (L − 3) × 20, L>6 → 85 + (L − 6) × 15, capped 100

log10(5,265) = 3.72, mapped as 25 + (L − 3) × 20 across the 1K–1M range (1K=25, 10K=45, 100K=65, 1M=85, 10M=100).

Engagement

100 /100

Engagement rate 340.41%, at or above the 6.00% top-decile rate for accounts with 5K–25K followers. Typical is 2.80%.

Weight 35% · piecewise-linear percentile curve for 5K–25K followers: 0%→5, p25 1.40%→30, p50 2.80%→55, p90 6.00%→85, 10.80%→100

Engagement rate 340.41% mapped onto the 5K–25K followers percentile curve (0%→5, p25 1.40%→30, p50 2.80%→55, p90 6.00%→85), measured across 2 of 11 sampled posts with visible like counts.

Engagement Quality

11 /100

0.12 comments per 100 likes, well below the 1–3% healthy band — the audience is scrolling past rather than replying. A comment costs far more effort than a like, so this ratio measures conversation rather than reach.

Weight 25% · comment-to-like ratio = avg comments ÷ avg likes × 100, mapped 0%→5, 0.5%→30, 1.5%→65, 3%→90, ≥5%→100

0.12 comments per 100 likes mapped as 0%→5, 0.5%→30, 1.5%→65, 3%→90, ≥5%→100.

Consistency

22 /100

Posting cadence 1.49 posts per week, approaching the healthy 3–7 per week band. Gaps between posts vary by 0.96× the mean gap of 4.7 days — under 0.5× reads as a dependable rhythm.

Weight 15% · 60 × (1 − clamp(stdev(gaps) ÷ mean(gaps), 0, 1)) + 40 × cadence factor (0/wk → 0, 3/wk → 1.0, 3–7/wk → 1.0, 14/wk → 0.6, ≥21/wk → 0.3)

regularity 0.04 (1 − stdev 4.5d ÷ mean gap 4.7d) and cadence factor 0.50 from 1.5 posts/week (0→0, ramping to 1.0 at 3/wk, flat 1.0 through 7/wk, tapering to 0.6 at 14/wk and 0.3 at 21+/wk).

Content Performance

60 /100

Breakout upside could not be measured on this sample. 100% of sampled posts carry both a caption and at least one hashtag (a well-kept feed is usually above 80%), across 2 distinct formats.

Weight 15% · 60 × upside score (top-post likes ÷ median likes: 1×→30, 2×→60, 3×→80, ≥5×→100) + 25 × caption-and-hashtag share + 15 × format mix (1.0 if ≥2 product types, else 0.5)

Upside unavailable (fewer than 3 visible-like posts); its weight was redistributed. enrichment 1.00 (caption + ≥1 hashtag), format mix 1.0 (2 distinct product types).

Growth Signals

Not measurable

Weight 10% · clamp(50 + weekly follower growth % × 25, 0, 100), where weekly % = (followers now ÷ followers then − 1) × 100 ÷ weeks

This is the first recorded audit of this account, so there is no observation window yet. Instagram publishes no follower history — Instapect measures growth by comparing snapshots it takes itself, and the trend appears from the second audit that is at least 7 days later.

Growth & cadence

Instagram publishes no follower history, so Instapect builds its own: every audit records a snapshot, and the trend below is measured across those snapshots. Everything else here comes from the visible posting record.

Follower growth

This is the first recorded audit of this account, so there is no observation window yet. Instagram publishes no follower history — Instapect measures growth by comparing snapshots it takes itself, and the trend appears from the second audit that is at least 7 days later.

Engagement rate per post (%)

Oldest to newest across the sampled posts. Unit: % of followers.

Likes and comments per post

Unit: absolute interactions per post.

Free account required

Create a free account to see when this account posts and when its audience actually responds — weekday mix and hour-of-day heatmap.

Create a free accountSign in

Engagement diagnostics

Averages are easily distorted by one viral post. The median tells you what a typical post actually does — read them side by side.

Average engagement rate

340.41%

Mean of (likes + comments) ÷ followers

Comment-only engagement rate

0.41%

Comments ÷ followers × 100 — the honest fallback when likes are hidden

Median engagement rate

341.60%

Middle post in the sample

Comment-to-like ratio

0.1%

Higher means more conversational audience

Like-based sample

2of 11 posts

9 posts hide their like count and are excluded from like-based numbers only — they still count for cadence, format, captions and comments (11 posts).

Free account required

Create a free account to see the full engagement distribution — how far the best and worst posts sit from the median.

Create a free accountSign in

Content leaderboard

Posts ranked by engagement rate by followers. Pinned posts are shown because a reader will recognise them, but they sit outside the measured window and feed no average, rate or rhythm.

Free account required

Create a free account to see the full content breakdown — every top post with its thumbnail and per-post engagement rate.

Create a free accountSign in

Hashtags & mentions

Frequency from captions in the sample, with the average engagement rate of the posts each tag appears on. Association, not causation.

Free account required

Create a free account to see the full hashtag and mention detail, with the engagement associated with each tag.

Create a free accountSign in

Action plan

Prioritised by expected impact, written from the measured data above. The advisor sees only the metrics this report could actually compute — never an estimate, never a metric Instagram keeps private.

Free account required

Create a free account to read the full AI action plan, the content plan, post ideas, hashtag strategy and best time to post for this account.

Create a free accountSign in

Methodology & caveats

What this report measures, how, and what it deliberately does not claim.

What this account does not make measurable

  • 9 of 11 sampled posts hide their like count. They stay in the sample for cadence, format, caption and comment metrics, and are excluded only from like-based ones, which are computed from 2 posts.
  • 1 pinned post was detected at the head of the response and excluded from the content window, leaving 11 of the 12 returned items. Pinned posts hold permanent placement and keep accumulating engagement, and the oldest one manufactures a gap that never happened — so they are excluded from cadence, gaps, regularity, format mix and every average. They still appear in the content leaderboard, badged "Pinned".
  • The content sample is the 11-item recent-posts window. The reels endpoint reaches further back and covers Reels only, so it is used to enrich matched items with their play count — never to extend the sample, which would inflate the Reel share and corrupt cadence.
  • 12 older Reels outside the content window are shown separately in "Top Reels by plays" with their own window, and are excluded from every average, the format mix and all cadence maths.
  • Play counts are published public counts shown only where the provider returns them. They are not reach, views or watch time, and none of those are available for a public-profile audit.

KPI definitions

  • Engagement rate by followers = (average likes + average comments) ÷ followers × 100.
  • Median engagement rate = the middle post's engagement rate in the sample; robust to viral outliers.
  • Posting cadence = (sampled posts − 1) ÷ days spanned × 7. Intervals, not posts: n posts span n−1 gaps. Unavailable below 2 posts or a zero-day window.
  • Instapect Score = 0.35 × Engagement + 0.25 × Engagement Quality + 0.15 × Consistency + 0.15 × Content Performance + 0.10 × Growth Signals, renormalised over the sub-scores that could be measured. Every account is graded against peers in its own follower tier; Audience Reach is reported separately and carries no weight.
  • Comment-to-like ratio = average comments ÷ average likes × 100. A healthy conversational account sits between 1% and 3%.

Sample, source & limits

  • 11 public posts sampled (2 usable for like-based metrics) · retrieved 10 Sept 2026 · served from the 24-hour cache.
  • Only lawfully-visible public signals are used: published posts, visible counts, captions, hashtags, mentions and timestamps.
  • Instapect never reports reach, impressions, audience demographics, Story insights or Reels watch-time. Those are private to the account owner and any tool claiming them for a third party is guessing.
  • Benchmarks are published industry medians by follower tier and are indicative, not guarantees. Any forward-looking figure is labelled an estimate with its method stated.

Share this score

A ready-to-post card with the Instapect Score, grade and the headline public metrics. Free to download — no account needed.

No card generated for this profile yet.

Cards show only lawfully-visible public metrics and carry the sample size and retrieval date, so anyone who sees one can check the full report.

This report is built only from lawfully-visible public Instagram signals — published posts and visible counts. It contains no reach, impressions, demographics, Story insights or watch-time, because nobody outside the account can see those. Request removal and the report is delisted from the directory, the category hubs and the sitemap.