@rfrlapp profile picture

@rfrlapp

@rfrlapp

624
Followers
23
Following
Not published
Posts
79Instapect ScoreB+

Instapect Score

79/100 · grade B+ — a performance read, benchmarked against under 5K followers.

Nano tier624 followersAudience Reach21/100Benchmarked against under 5K followers
Engagement rate
9.95%

by followers · typical 4.00%

Avg likes
54

median 54

Avg comments
8

median 6

Cadence
2.2

posts / week · 3.2 d apart

Comment-to-like
15.76%

healthy band 1–3%

Median ER
10.58%

middle post in the sample

Public-profile audit · 11 posts sampled (1 pinned excluded) · retrieved 9 Sept 2026· served from cache

Find women + nonbinary-owned businesses. 📍 Austin, Denver & Kansas City ⚡️ Built by @whatshesaidinc ⬇️ Download for FREE

rfrl.app/l/iosapp

Profile snapshot

Headline public metrics for @rfrlapp, from 11 sampled posts. Averages sit beside medians so one viral post cannot flatter the picture.

Engagement rate

9.95%

(avg likes + avg comments) ÷ followers · median 10.58% · under 5K followers

Average likes

54

Median 54 · 11 posts with a visible like count

Average comments

8

Median 6 · comment-to-like 15.8%

Posting cadence

2.2posts / week

About one post every 3.2 days

Latest posts

Newest first · engagement rate by followers per post

4 Sept 2026 · reel

Community gets reaaaally powerful when we stop gatekeeping who and what we know!! Biz matchmaking, cuban coffee from @elcafecubanokc + a whole wall of ‘babe, I know exactly who you need.’ is our kind of networking. ❤️‍🔥 We deeply believe referrals are how we build stronger businesses + a stronger femme economy. So we collab’d w/ @thefoundership KC community with a @rfrlapp wall to share the humans they actually know, trust + want to see win. Their Q3 meetup was all about solving the hard stuff, talking through it, sharing what you know, sending the referral, opening doors and rooting for each other. Skip the small talk. Find what and who you’re looking for on @rfrlapp & if your KC local, join the @thefoundership community! Coffee cohorts, online resource sharing, retreats - they got it all and we are crushing hard. #network #community #referrals #womenowned

25

likes

5

comments

4.81%

ER

27 Aug 2026 · reel

Babyyy, we don’t play. We mean BIIIIZZZNES. 💋 Like, what do you mean you’re still waiting for the group chat to remember the name of that biz they recommended six months ago??? That’s literally why we built @rfrlapp. And now our baby is ONE. 🥹 We’ve been building RFRL with you in every convo, IRL event, and every “wait, I know someone” we heard along the way. Bc if we want the femme economy to grow, we need actual infrastructure to help us ✨find each other✨. Think of RFRL as the place to find the shes + theys building businesses your people already know, love + trust. Rome wasn’t built in a day. Apparently neither is the matriarchy. But we’re working on it. 💅 Download @rfrlapp + let’s help each other build for the shes, theys, and gays. #discover #womenowned #queerowned #community #businesses

54

likes

17

comments

11.38%

ER

26 Aug 2026 · reel

Found on @rfrlapp → immediately obsessed → now we’re putting you on. 💋 @velvet.lasso is giving coffee date, coworking spot, cocktail hour, lunch AND photo booth pics with the babes all under one roof. Like??? Pick a lane or don’t. We support it. AND we checked in with RFRL RED and got a perk while discovering our new Denver fav ❤️ This is exactly why RFRL exists: finding women + nonbinary-owned businesses worth knowing, loving them, and making sure everyone else knows too. Download @rfrlapp, join RFRL RED + go find somewhere worth referring. Velvet Lasso, we’ll absolutely be back. 💅 #discover #womenowned #queerowned #local #denver

61

likes

5

comments

10.58%

ER

14 Aug 2026 · carousel

kinda chic to be a whole human with big dreams, friends to hype, boundaries to protect, and a life you actually want to enjoy ❤️‍🔥 #womenowned #queerowned #community

90

likes

4

comments

15.06%

ER

13 Aug 2026 · reel

New city, same question: okay… but where are my people? The coffee shop you’ll become a regular at, THE hairstylist you’ll trust with your life, or the bookstore you’ll live an afternoon in. The type of biz you immediately send to the gc. @rfrlapp helps you find them. ❤️ And RFRL RED gives you perks for supporting women + nonbinary-owned businesses. Btw.. angels are saying this will be ur way to transform a new city into home. Comment “RED” to unlock hundreds of perks for ✨ $55.55 for the year. ✨ #discover #womenowned #queerowned #network #community

40

likes

11

comments

8.17%

ER

10 Aug 2026 · carousel

Consider this your sign to stop losing your best recs in the group chat. 💋 Here’s how easy it is: Set up your RFRL profile, find women and nonbinary owned businesses near you, and shout out the ones you already know and love. Download @rfrlapp + find your next fav #discover #womenowned #queerowned #community #nearyou

23

likes

4

comments

4.33%

ER

How the score was built

The verdict is at the top of the page; this is the reasoning underneath it. Every sub-score prints its own weight and formula — no black box.

Archetype

High-Engagement Community

Both the rate of response and the depth of it are strong — this audience reacts and talks back.

Nominal weights: Engagement 35% · Engagement Quality 25% · Consistency 15% · Content Performance 15% · Growth 10%. Audience Reach is context only and carries no weight — every account is graded against peers in its own follower tier · composite from 4 of 5 signals — unavailable sub-scores are excluded from both sums, not scored zero

Audience Reach

21 /100

Nano tier

624 followers (under 10K followers). An asset score: how many people this account can reach. It does not move with how well the posts perform.

What this means

Engagement is top-decile for this size

Engagement rate 9.95% is at or above the 8.00% top-decile mark for under 5K followers. Audience responsiveness is the strength of this account, not something it needs to fix.

Performance is genuinely consistent

Median likes (54) are 101% of the average (54). No viral outlier is propping up the average, so every number in this report describes what a typical post actually does — a dependable baseline is a real asset when planning.

Audience Reach

21 /100

624 followers puts this account in the Nano tier (under 10K followers). This is an asset score — how many people the account can reach — and it never moves based on how well the posts perform.

Weight 0% · log-scaled followers: L = log10(followers); L≤3 → 5–25, 3<L≤6 → 25 + (L − 3) × 20, L>6 → 85 + (L − 6) × 15, capped 100

log10(624) = 2.80, mapped as 25 + (L − 3) × 20 across the 1K–1M range (1K=25, 10K=45, 100K=65, 1M=85, 10M=100).

Engagement

90 /100

Engagement rate 9.95%, at or above the 8.00% top-decile rate for accounts with under 5K followers. Typical is 4.00%.

Weight 35% · piecewise-linear percentile curve for under 5K followers: 0%→5, p25 2.00%→30, p50 4.00%→55, p90 8.00%→85, 14.40%→100

Engagement rate 9.95% mapped onto the under 5K followers percentile curve (0%→5, p25 2.00%→30, p50 4.00%→55, p90 8.00%→85), measured across 11 of 11 sampled posts with visible like counts.

Engagement Quality

100 /100

15.76 comments per 100 likes, above the 1–3% healthy band, an unusually conversational audience. A comment costs far more effort than a like, so this ratio measures conversation rather than reach.

Weight 25% · comment-to-like ratio = avg comments ÷ avg likes × 100, mapped 0%→5, 0.5%→30, 1.5%→65, 3%→90, ≥5%→100

15.76 comments per 100 likes mapped as 0%→5, 0.5%→30, 1.5%→65, 3%→90, ≥5%→100.

Consistency

29 /100

Posting cadence 2.19 posts per week, approaching the healthy 3–7 per week band. Gaps between posts vary by 1.19× the mean gap of 3.2 days — under 0.5× reads as a dependable rhythm.

Weight 15% · 60 × (1 − clamp(stdev(gaps) ÷ mean(gaps), 0, 1)) + 40 × cadence factor (0/wk → 0, 3/wk → 1.0, 3–7/wk → 1.0, 14/wk → 0.6, ≥21/wk → 0.3)

regularity 0.00 (1 − stdev 3.8d ÷ mean gap 3.2d) and cadence factor 0.73 from 2.2 posts/week (0→0, ramping to 1.0 at 3/wk, flat 1.0 through 7/wk, tapering to 0.6 at 14/wk and 0.3 at 21+/wk).

Content Performance

68 /100

The best post in the window drew 1.7× the median post's likes — 1× means no post ever breaks out, 3× or more means the account reliably produces outliers worth repeating. 91% of sampled posts carry both a caption and at least one hashtag (a well-kept feed is usually above 80%), across 2 distinct formats.

Weight 15% · 60 × upside score (top-post likes ÷ median likes: 1×→30, 2×→60, 3×→80, ≥5×→100) + 25 × caption-and-hashtag share + 15 × format mix (1.0 if ≥2 product types, else 0.5)

upside 1.67× (top post 90 likes ÷ median 54) scoring 50, enrichment 0.91 (caption + ≥1 hashtag), format mix 1.0 (2 distinct product types).

Growth Signals

Not measurable

Weight 10% · clamp(50 + weekly follower growth % × 25, 0, 100), where weekly % = (followers now ÷ followers then − 1) × 100 ÷ weeks

This is the first recorded audit of this account, so there is no observation window yet. Instagram publishes no follower history — Instapect measures growth by comparing snapshots it takes itself, and the trend appears from the second audit that is at least 7 days later.

Growth & cadence

Instagram publishes no follower history, so Instapect builds its own: every audit records a snapshot, and the trend below is measured across those snapshots. Everything else here comes from the visible posting record.

Follower growth

This is the first recorded audit of this account, so there is no observation window yet. Instagram publishes no follower history — Instapect measures growth by comparing snapshots it takes itself, and the trend appears from the second audit that is at least 7 days later.

Engagement rate per post (%)

Oldest to newest across the sampled posts. Unit: % of followers.

Likes and comments per post

Unit: absolute interactions per post.

Free account required

Create a free account to see when this account posts and when its audience actually responds — weekday mix and hour-of-day heatmap.

Engagement diagnostics

Averages are easily distorted by one viral post. The median tells you what a typical post actually does — read them side by side.

Average engagement rate

9.95%

Mean of (likes + comments) ÷ followers

Comment-only engagement rate

1.35%

Comments ÷ followers × 100 — the honest fallback when likes are hidden

Median engagement rate

10.58%

Middle post in the sample

Comment-to-like ratio

15.8%

Higher means more conversational audience

Like-based sample

11of 11 posts

Every sampled post shows its like count. Comment metrics use all 11 posts.

Free account required

Create a free account to see the full engagement distribution — how far the best and worst posts sit from the median.

Content leaderboard

Posts ranked by engagement rate by followers. Pinned posts are shown because a reader will recognise them, but they sit outside the measured window and feed no average, rate or rhythm.

Free account required

Create a free account to see the full content breakdown — every top post with its thumbnail and per-post engagement rate.

Hashtags & mentions

Frequency from captions in the sample, with the average engagement rate of the posts each tag appears on. Association, not causation.

Free account required

Create a free account to see the full hashtag and mention detail, with the engagement associated with each tag.

Action plan

Prioritised by expected impact, written from the measured data above. The advisor sees only the metrics this report could actually compute — never an estimate, never a metric Instagram keeps private.

Free account required

Create a free account to read the full AI action plan, the content plan, post ideas, hashtag strategy and best time to post for this account.

Methodology & caveats

What this report measures, how, and what it deliberately does not claim.

What this account does not make measurable

  • 1 pinned post was detected at the head of the response and excluded from the content window, leaving 11 of the 12 returned items. Pinned posts hold permanent placement and keep accumulating engagement, and the oldest one manufactures a gap that never happened — so they are excluded from cadence, gaps, regularity, format mix and every average. They still appear in the content leaderboard, badged "Pinned".
  • The content sample is the 11-item recent-posts window. The reels endpoint reaches further back and covers Reels only, so it is used to enrich matched items with their play count (7 matched) — never to extend the sample, which would inflate the Reel share and corrupt cadence.
  • 5 older Reels outside the content window are shown separately in "Top Reels by plays" with their own window, and are excluded from every average, the format mix and all cadence maths.
  • Play counts are published public counts shown only where the provider returns them. They are not reach, views or watch time, and none of those are available for a public-profile audit.

KPI definitions

  • Engagement rate by followers = (average likes + average comments) ÷ followers × 100.
  • Median engagement rate = the middle post's engagement rate in the sample; robust to viral outliers.
  • Posting cadence = (sampled posts − 1) ÷ days spanned × 7. Intervals, not posts: n posts span n−1 gaps. Unavailable below 2 posts or a zero-day window.
  • Instapect Score = 0.35 × Engagement + 0.25 × Engagement Quality + 0.15 × Consistency + 0.15 × Content Performance + 0.10 × Growth Signals, renormalised over the sub-scores that could be measured. Every account is graded against peers in its own follower tier; Audience Reach is reported separately and carries no weight.
  • Comment-to-like ratio = average comments ÷ average likes × 100. A healthy conversational account sits between 1% and 3%.

Sample, source & limits

  • 11 public posts sampled (11 usable for like-based metrics) · retrieved 9 Sept 2026 · served from the 24-hour cache.
  • Only lawfully-visible public signals are used: published posts, visible counts, captions, hashtags, mentions and timestamps.
  • Instapect never reports reach, impressions, audience demographics, Story insights or Reels watch-time. Those are private to the account owner and any tool claiming them for a third party is guessing.
  • Benchmarks are published industry medians by follower tier and are indicative, not guarantees. Any forward-looking figure is labelled an estimate with its method stated.

Share this score

A ready-to-post card with the Instapect Score, grade and the headline public metrics. Free to download — no account needed.

No card generated for this profile yet.

Cards show only lawfully-visible public metrics and carry the sample size and retrieval date, so anyone who sees one can check the full report.

This report is built only from lawfully-visible public Instagram signals — published posts and visible counts. It contains no reach, impressions, demographics, Story insights or watch-time, because nobody outside the account can see those. Request removal and the report is delisted from the directory, the category hubs and the sitemap.