Instapect
Sign inCreate account
@primaziafisiomassagem profile picture

@primaziafisiomassagem

@primaziafisiomassagem

7,890
Followers
1,988
Following
Not published
Posts
18Instapect ScoreF

Instapect Score

18/100 · grade F — a performance read, benchmarked against 5K–25K followers.

Nano tier7,890 followersAudience Reach43/100Benchmarked against 5K–25K followers
Engagement rate
0.17%

by followers · typical 2.80%

Avg likes
13

median 6

Avg comments
0

median 0

Cadence
0.8

posts / week · 8.9 d apart

Comment-to-like
3.27%

healthy band 1–3%

Median ER
0.08%

middle post in the sample

Public-profile audit · 12 posts sampled · retrieved 11 Sept 2026· served from cache

🟢Sinta_se incrível,cuidada(o)amada(o)com nossos tratamentos.Somos o poder do melhor resultado.

Profile snapshot

Headline public metrics for @primaziafisiomassagem, from 12 sampled posts. Averages sit beside medians so one viral post cannot flatter the picture.

Engagement rate

0.17%

(avg likes + avg comments) ÷ followers · median 0.08% · 5K–25K followers

Average likes

13

Median 6 · 12 posts with a visible like count

Average comments

0

Median 0 · comment-to-like 3.3%

Posting cadence

0.8posts / week

About one post every 8.9 days

Latest posts

Newest first · engagement rate by followers per post

21 Mar 2026 · reel

Suporte Muscular: Ajuda a estabilizar articulações (joelho, tornozelo, ombro) e melhora a propriocepção. Alívio da Dor e Edema: Ao elevar a pele, melhora a circulação sanguínea e linfática, reduzindo hematomas e inflamações. Performance Esportiva: Auxilia na prevenção de lesões durante atividades intensas. Pós-operatório: Utilizado para reduzir edemas após procedimentos cirúrgicos.

8

likes

0

comments

0.10%

ER

9 Mar 2026 · reel

A ledterapia facial é um tratamento não invasivo que utiliza luzes de baixa intensidade (fotobiomodulação) para estimular a regeneração celular, produzindo colágeno, reduzindo a acne, inflamações e sinais de envelhecimento.

7

likes

1

comments

0.10%

ER

13 Feb 2026 · reel

A drenagem linfática é uma técnica de massagem terapêutica, manual ou mecânica, que utiliza movimentos suaves, lentos e rítmicos para estimular o sistema linfático. Seu principal objetivo é acelerar a circulação da linfa, reduzindo a retenção de líquidos (edemas), eliminando toxinas e diminuindo o inchaço corporal. Principais Aspectos da Drenagem Linfática: Funcionamento: A técnica direciona o excesso de fluidos e toxinas para os gânglios linfáticos, que filtram as impurezas, devolvendo o líquido purificado à corrente sanguínea para ser excretado na urina. Benefícios: Inclui a diminuição de inchaço (especialmente em pernas e abdômen), redução da sensação de peso, auxílio no pós-operatório (como cirurgias plásticas), combate à celulite e relaxamento, segundo Onodera Estética. Indicações: É amplamente indicada para alívio de edemas, período de gestação, pré-menstrual, além de atuar na oxigenação dos tecidos e relaxamento. Diferença entre Técnicas: A drenagem manual utiliza toques suaves e precisos, enquanto a mecânica (como pressoterapia) usa aparelhos para compressão Mitos: A drenagem linfática não emagrece diretamente, pois elimina líquidos e não gordura, embora a redução do inchaço melhore o contorno corporal. Contraindicações e Cuidados: A técnica deve ser evitada em casos de infecções agudas, trombose, hipertensão descontrolada e insuficiência cardíaca. Recomenda-se avaliação profissional antes de iniciar as sessões

6

likes

0

comments

0.08%

ER

13 Feb 2026 · reel

O lipedema é uma doença crônica caracterizada pelo acúmulo anormal e desproporcional de gordura subcutânea, principalmente nas pernas e braços, causando dor, sensibilidade e inchaço, afetando majoritariamente mulheres. Massoterapeutas podem ajudar através de técnicas suaves de drenagem linfática manual (DLM), cruciais para reduzir o edema, aliviar a dor e melhorar a circulação, sem usar força excessiva. O que o massoterapeuta pode fazer para ajudar: Drenagem Linfática Manual (DLM): É a técnica principal, pois ajuda a reduzir o inchaço (edema) e o volume do membro, diminuindo o desconforto e a dor crônica. Toque Suave: A massagem deve ser rítmica e leve. Movimentos vigorosos ou intensos (como massagem modeladora) são contraindicados, pois podem lesionar os vasos frágeis, aumentar a inflamação e a dor. Melhora da mobilidade: Ao diminuir a dor e o inchaço nas articulações, a terapia manual ajuda a melhorar a funcionalidade e mobilidade das pernas. Suporte ao tratamento global: O massoterapeuta atua em conjunto com a equipe médica, preparando o corpo para a terapia de compressão (meias/bandagens) e auxiliando na redução de toxinas. O que evitar: Massagens vigorosas, uso de rolos com ventosas fortes ou equipamentos de vácuo intenso (como endermologia forte) podem piorar o quadro inflamatório e aumentar a dor. Nota: O tratamento do lipedema é multidisciplinar, envolvendo dieta anti-inflamatória e exercícios, sendo a massagem um pilar de alívio sintomático.

5

likes

0

comments

0.06%

ER

2 Feb 2026 · reel

Alívio da Tensão e Dor Muscular: O calor penetra profundamente nos músculos, promovendo um relaxamento que o toque manual sozinho pode não alcançar. Isso ajuda a aliviar dores musculares, rigidez e até dores crônicas, como as causadas por artrite. Melhora da Circulação Sanguínea: A dilatação dos vasos sanguíneos pelo calor aumenta o fluxo de sangue, o que melhora a oxigenação dos tecidos e a entrega de nutrientes, além de auxiliar na eliminação de toxinas do corpo. Redução do Estresse e Ansiedade: A sensação de calor e o relaxamento profundo induzem um estado de calma e serenidade, o que pode reduzir significativamente os níveis de estresse e sintomas de ansiedade. Melhora da Qualidade do Sono: Ao promover relaxamento e reduzir a tensão muscular, a técnica pode combater a insônia e levar a um sono mais profundo e restaurador. Equilíbrio Energético: Na terapia, as pedras aquecidas são frequentemente colocadas em pontos estratégicos do corpo, como os chakras, para harmonizar e otimizar o fluxo de energia, promovendo uma sensação de bem-estar geral.

5

likes

0

comments

0.06%

ER

31 Jan 2026 · reel

#Fisioterapia no pós Acidente vascular cerebral 70% de evolução

5

likes

0

comments

0.06%

ER

How the score was built

The verdict is at the top of the page; this is the reasoning underneath it. Every sub-score prints its own weight and formula — no black box.

Archetype

Developing Profile

No single pattern dominates yet. The sub-scores below show which dimension moves the result most.

Nominal weights: Engagement 35% · Engagement Quality 25% · Consistency 15% · Content Performance 15% · Growth 10%. Audience Reach is context only and carries no weight — every account is graded against peers in its own follower tier · composite from 3 of 5 signals — unavailable sub-scores are excluded from both sums, not scored zero

Audience Reach

43 /100

Nano tier

7,890 followers (under 10K followers). An asset score: how many people this account can reach. It does not move with how well the posts perform.

What this means

Engagement sits in the bottom quartile of its tier

Engagement rate 0.17% is below the 1.40% bottom quartile for 5K–25K followers, where typical is 2.80%. Closing to typical would mean roughly 1578% more likes and comments per post at the current follower count.

Posting frequency is the most controllable lever

At 0.79 posts per week — one every 9 days — the account publishes less than once a week. Unlike engagement rate, cadence is entirely within the owner's control, which makes it the cheapest thing on this page to change.

A few posts carry the average

Median likes (6) are only 47% of the average (13), so a small number of strong posts is lifting the mean. Read the median as the typical result and treat the outliers as a template worth repeating.

Audience Reach

43 /100

7,890 followers puts this account in the Nano tier (under 10K followers). This is an asset score — how many people the account can reach — and it never moves based on how well the posts perform.

Weight 0% · log-scaled followers: L = log10(followers); L≤3 → 5–25, 3<L≤6 → 25 + (L − 3) × 20, L>6 → 85 + (L − 6) × 15, capped 100

log10(7,890) = 3.90, mapped as 25 + (L − 3) × 20 across the 1K–1M range (1K=25, 10K=45, 100K=65, 1M=85, 10M=100).

Engagement

8 /100

Engagement rate 0.17%, below the 1.40% bottom quartile for accounts with 5K–25K followers. Typical is 2.80%.

Weight 35% · piecewise-linear percentile curve for 5K–25K followers: 0%→5, p25 1.40%→30, p50 2.80%→55, p90 6.00%→85, 10.80%→100

Engagement rate 0.17% mapped onto the 5K–25K followers percentile curve (0%→5, p25 1.40%→30, p50 2.80%→55, p90 6.00%→85), measured across 12 of 12 sampled posts with visible like counts.

Engagement Quality

Not measurable

Weight 25% · comment-to-like ratio = avg comments ÷ avg likes × 100, mapped 0%→5, 0.5%→30, 1.5%→65, 3%→90, ≥5%→100

The typical post carries 0 comments, below the 5-comment base at which a comment-to-like ratio is statistically meaningful. One or two reactions expressed as a percentage is not a measurement, so the weight is redistributed rather than scored.

Consistency

10 /100

Posting cadence 0.79 posts per week, below the 1-per-week floor most active accounts clear. Gaps between posts vary by 1.51× the mean gap of 8.9 days — under 0.5× reads as a dependable rhythm.

Weight 15% · 60 × (1 − clamp(stdev(gaps) ÷ mean(gaps), 0, 1)) + 40 × cadence factor (0/wk → 0, 3/wk → 1.0, 3–7/wk → 1.0, 14/wk → 0.6, ≥21/wk → 0.3)

regularity 0.00 (1 − stdev 13.5d ÷ mean gap 8.9d) and cadence factor 0.26 from 0.8 posts/week (0→0, ramping to 1.0 at 3/wk, flat 1.0 through 7/wk, tapering to 0.6 at 14/wk and 0.3 at 21+/wk).

Content Performance

50 /100

Breakout upside could not be measured on this sample. 50% of sampled posts carry both a caption and at least one hashtag (a well-kept feed is usually above 80%), across 1 distinct format.

Weight 15% · 60 × upside score (top-post likes ÷ median likes: 1×→30, 2×→60, 3×→80, ≥5×→100) + 25 × caption-and-hashtag share + 15 × format mix (1.0 if ≥2 product types, else 0.5)

Upside unavailable (the median post draws fewer than 30 visible likes, too thin a base for a breakout ratio); its weight was redistributed. enrichment 0.50 (caption + ≥1 hashtag), format mix 0.5 (1 distinct product type).

Growth Signals

Not measurable

Weight 10% · clamp(50 + weekly follower growth % × 25, 0, 100), where weekly % = (followers now ÷ followers then − 1) × 100 ÷ weeks

This is the first recorded audit of this account, so there is no observation window yet. Instagram publishes no follower history — Instapect measures growth by comparing snapshots it takes itself, and the trend appears from the second audit that is at least 7 days later.

Growth & cadence

Instagram publishes no follower history, so Instapect builds its own: every audit records a snapshot, and the trend below is measured across those snapshots. Everything else here comes from the visible posting record.

Follower growth

This is the first recorded audit of this account, so there is no observation window yet. Instagram publishes no follower history — Instapect measures growth by comparing snapshots it takes itself, and the trend appears from the second audit that is at least 7 days later.

Engagement rate per post (%)

Oldest to newest across the sampled posts. Unit: % of followers.

Likes and comments per post

Unit: absolute interactions per post.

Free account required

Create a free account to see when this account posts and when its audience actually responds — weekday mix and hour-of-day heatmap.

Create a free accountSign in

Engagement diagnostics

Averages are easily distorted by one viral post. The median tells you what a typical post actually does — read them side by side.

Average engagement rate

0.17%

Mean of (likes + comments) ÷ followers

Comment-only engagement rate

0.01%

Comments ÷ followers × 100 — the honest fallback when likes are hidden

Median engagement rate

0.08%

Middle post in the sample

Comment-to-like ratio

3.3%

Higher means more conversational audience

Like-based sample

12of 12 posts

Every sampled post shows its like count. Comment metrics use all 12 posts.

Free account required

Create a free account to see the full engagement distribution — how far the best and worst posts sit from the median.

Create a free accountSign in

Content leaderboard

Posts ranked by engagement rate by followers. Pinned posts are shown because a reader will recognise them, but they sit outside the measured window and feed no average, rate or rhythm.

Free account required

Create a free account to see the full content breakdown — every top post with its thumbnail and per-post engagement rate.

Create a free accountSign in

Hashtags & mentions

Frequency from captions in the sample, with the average engagement rate of the posts each tag appears on. Association, not causation.

Free account required

Create a free account to see the full hashtag and mention detail, with the engagement associated with each tag.

Create a free accountSign in

Action plan

Prioritised by expected impact, written from the measured data above. The advisor sees only the metrics this report could actually compute — never an estimate, never a metric Instagram keeps private.

Free account required

Create a free account to read the full AI action plan, the content plan, post ideas, hashtag strategy and best time to post for this account.

Create a free accountSign in

Methodology & caveats

What this report measures, how, and what it deliberately does not claim.

What this account does not make measurable

  • The content sample is the 12-item recent-posts window. The reels endpoint reaches further back and covers Reels only, so it is used to enrich matched items with their play count (12 matched) — never to extend the sample, which would inflate the Reel share and corrupt cadence.
  • Play counts are published public counts shown only where the provider returns them. They are not reach, views or watch time, and none of those are available for a public-profile audit.

KPI definitions

  • Engagement rate by followers = (average likes + average comments) ÷ followers × 100.
  • Median engagement rate = the middle post's engagement rate in the sample; robust to viral outliers.
  • Posting cadence = (sampled posts − 1) ÷ days spanned × 7. Intervals, not posts: n posts span n−1 gaps. Unavailable below 2 posts or a zero-day window.
  • Instapect Score = 0.35 × Engagement + 0.25 × Engagement Quality + 0.15 × Consistency + 0.15 × Content Performance + 0.10 × Growth Signals, renormalised over the sub-scores that could be measured. Every account is graded against peers in its own follower tier; Audience Reach is reported separately and carries no weight.
  • Comment-to-like ratio = average comments ÷ average likes × 100. A healthy conversational account sits between 1% and 3%.

Sample, source & limits

  • 12 public posts sampled (12 usable for like-based metrics) · retrieved 11 Sept 2026 · served from the 24-hour cache.
  • Only lawfully-visible public signals are used: published posts, visible counts, captions, hashtags, mentions and timestamps.
  • Instapect never reports reach, impressions, audience demographics, Story insights or Reels watch-time. Those are private to the account owner and any tool claiming them for a third party is guessing.
  • Benchmarks are published industry medians by follower tier and are indicative, not guarantees. Any forward-looking figure is labelled an estimate with its method stated.

Share this score

A ready-to-post card with the Instapect Score, grade and the headline public metrics. Free to download — no account needed.

No card generated for this profile yet.

Cards show only lawfully-visible public metrics and carry the sample size and retrieval date, so anyone who sees one can check the full report.

This report is built only from lawfully-visible public Instagram signals — published posts and visible counts. It contains no reach, impressions, demographics, Story insights or watch-time, because nobody outside the account can see those. Request removal and the report is delisted from the directory, the category hubs and the sitemap.