@nutritionbysobiaathar profile picture

@nutritionbysobiaathar

@nutritionbysobiaathar

260
Followers
41
Following
Not published
Posts
67Instapect ScoreB−

Instapect Score

67/100 · grade B− — a performance read, benchmarked against under 5K followers.

Nano tier260 followersAudience Reach13/100Benchmarked against under 5K followers
Engagement rate
10.26%

by followers · typical 4.00%

Avg likes
25

median 13

Avg comments
1

median 1

Cadence
1.5

posts / week · 4.6 d apart

Comment-to-like
5.26%

healthy band 1–3%

Median ER
5.00%

middle post in the sample

Public-profile audit · 9 posts sampled (3 pinned excluded) · retrieved 12 Sept 2026· served from cache

Helping working women (30-40s) tired of eating less Lose 8-10kg fat in 99 Days without starving Reverse Insulin Resistance DM “HEAL” to start

Profile snapshot

Headline public metrics for @nutritionbysobiaathar, from 9 sampled posts. Averages sit beside medians so one viral post cannot flatter the picture.

Engagement rate

10.26%

(avg likes + avg comments) ÷ followers · median 5.00% · under 5K followers

Average likes

25

Median 13 · 3 posts with a visible like count

Average comments

1

Median 1 · comment-to-like 5.3%

Posting cadence

1.5posts / week

About one post every 4.6 days

Latest posts

Newest first · engagement rate by followers per post

11 Sept 2026 · reel

Are your hormones or gut holding you back from your health goals? 🛑 From fertility struggles and irregular periods to stubborn weight and energy crashes, your body constantly gives you signs when something is off inside. 🌿 In my 1:1 Personalized Diet Coaching, we focus on the root cause. No starvation diets, no generic templates. Just a tailored nutrition plan designed specifically for your hormone balance, metabolism, and lifestyle. 📥 DM me 'HEAL' to book your 1:1 consultation! #Dietitian #Nutritionist #PCOS #FertilityNutrition #ConceiveNaturally HormoneHealth GutHealth WeightLossJourney 1on1Coaching CustomMealPlan

13

likes

0

comments

5.00%

ER

10 Sept 2026 · carousel

I provide 1:1 couching in which you can easily achieve your FAT loss goal, can CONCIEVE, reverse pcos PMOS, fix your INSULIN resistance, hormonal imbalance, slow poor metabolism, Constipation, and stuck weight by taking such meals DM HEAL to start your journey

9

likes

1

comments

3.85%

ER

16 Aug 2026 · reel

It’s not about eating less or working out more. It’s Insulin Resistance. When insulin is high, your body stores fat around your belly and causes: blood sugar spikes → crashes → cravings → fatigue. SOLUTION: We fix the root cause: Blood Sugar. With insulin-friendly meals, proper timing, and 1:1 support → Cravings disappear → Energy becomes stable → Stubborn belly fat finally starts to melt I’m opening 3 spots for my 99 DAYS IR RESET PROGRAM ✓ Custom meal plan - no starvation ✓ Craving control + energy strategies ✓ Routinely check-ins + 1:1 accountability ✓ Grocery + restaurant guides DM "HEAL" to claim 14% OFF before slots are gone. #insulinresistance #bellyfatloss #sugarcravings #hormonalweightloss #99daystransformation womenshealthcoach weightlossforwomen

Hidden

likes

3

comments

ER

15 Aug 2026 · reel

Insulin Resistance makes your body store fat instead of burning it. That’s why diets stop working. The good news? It’s reversible. With the right food, timing, and support, you can balance blood sugar, lose fat, and get energy back. I help women do this with: ✓ No extreme diets ✓ Food they actually enjoy ✓ 1:1 guidance and accountability DM "HEAL" and I’ll send you the details + free IR checklist. #insulinresistance #hormonalhealth #weightlossjourney #womenswellness #pcosawareness

Hidden

likes

0

comments

ER

14 Aug 2026 · reel

Here’s what’s actually making you gain fat: 1. Constant Carbs → Your body burns sugar first. Fat never gets a turn. If you keep eating carbs, you never burn fat. 2. High Insulin → Insulin is the switch. Up = you STORE fat. Down = you BURN fat. It never drops if you never stop eating/snacking. 3. Insulin Resistance → Snacks, sugar, stress all day. Your cells stop listening, so your body makes MORE insulin. You eat less, train more, and still gain. 4. No Training → Carbs aren’t the enemy. They’re fuel you have to EARN. Train = muscles burn them. Sit all day = they turn to fat. 5. Stress + Poor Sleep → Cortisol blocks insulin just like sugar does. One bad night and you crave junk. Stress makes you STORE. 6. Seed Oils + Refined Carbs → They spike inflammation. Inflammation and fat feed each other. It becomes a cycle. The rule is simple: Train? Eat carbs. Don’t train? Don’t. Let insulin fall and burn what you’re carrying. Fat isn’t the villain. The constant sugar, stress, and sitting is. Save this so you remember it. Tag someone who needs to hear this 👇 DM HEAL to start your journey. #fatloss #nutrition #insulinresistance #healthtips #weightlossjourney

Hidden

likes

2

comments

ER

11 Aug 2026 · reel

Azadi Deal 🇵🇰 14% Discount available till 16th of August 2026 DM HEAL if you want to transform yourself in 99-Days #fitness #weightlosstransformation #healthy #weightloss #azadi

Hidden

likes

0

comments

ER

How the score was built

The verdict is at the top of the page; this is the reasoning underneath it. Every sub-score prints its own weight and formula — no black box.

Archetype

Developing Profile

No single pattern dominates yet. The sub-scores below show which dimension moves the result most.

Nominal weights: Engagement 35% · Engagement Quality 25% · Consistency 15% · Content Performance 15% · Growth 10%. Audience Reach is context only and carries no weight — every account is graded against peers in its own follower tier · composite from 3 of 5 signals — unavailable sub-scores are excluded from both sums, not scored zero

Audience Reach

13 /100

Nano tier

260 followers (under 10K followers). An asset score: how many people this account can reach. It does not move with how well the posts perform.

What this means

Engagement is top-decile for this size

Engagement rate 10.26% is at or above the 8.00% top-decile mark for under 5K followers. Audience responsiveness is the strength of this account, not something it needs to fix.

A few posts carry the average

Median likes (13) are only 51% of the average (25), so a small number of strong posts is lifting the mean. Read the median as the typical result and treat the outliers as a template worth repeating.

Audience Reach

13 /100

260 followers puts this account in the Nano tier (under 10K followers). This is an asset score — how many people the account can reach — and it never moves based on how well the posts perform.

Weight 0% · log-scaled followers: L = log10(followers); L≤3 → 5–25, 3<L≤6 → 25 + (L − 3) × 20, L>6 → 85 + (L − 6) × 15, capped 100

log10(260) = 2.41, mapped as 25 + (L − 3) × 20 across the 1K–1M range (1K=25, 10K=45, 100K=65, 1M=85, 10M=100).

Engagement

90 /100

Engagement rate 10.26%, at or above the 8.00% top-decile rate for accounts with under 5K followers. Typical is 4.00%.

Weight 35% · piecewise-linear percentile curve for under 5K followers: 0%→5, p25 2.00%→30, p50 4.00%→55, p90 8.00%→85, 14.40%→100

Engagement rate 10.26% mapped onto the under 5K followers percentile curve (0%→5, p25 2.00%→30, p50 4.00%→55, p90 8.00%→85), measured across 3 of 9 sampled posts with visible like counts.

Engagement Quality

Not measurable

Weight 25% · comment-to-like ratio = avg comments ÷ avg likes × 100, mapped 0%→5, 0.5%→30, 1.5%→65, 3%→90, ≥5%→100

The typical post carries 1 comments, below the 5-comment base at which a comment-to-like ratio is statistically meaningful. One or two reactions expressed as a percentage is not a measurement, so the weight is redistributed rather than scored.

Consistency

20 /100

Posting cadence 1.53 posts per week, approaching the healthy 3–7 per week band. Gaps between posts vary by 1.68× the mean gap of 4.6 days — under 0.5× reads as a dependable rhythm.

Weight 15% · 60 × (1 − clamp(stdev(gaps) ÷ mean(gaps), 0, 1)) + 40 × cadence factor (0/wk → 0, 3/wk → 1.0, 3–7/wk → 1.0, 14/wk → 0.6, ≥21/wk → 0.3)

regularity 0.00 (1 − stdev 7.7d ÷ mean gap 4.6d) and cadence factor 0.51 from 1.5 posts/week (0→0, ramping to 1.0 at 3/wk, flat 1.0 through 7/wk, tapering to 0.6 at 14/wk and 0.3 at 21+/wk).

Content Performance

60 /100

Breakout upside could not be measured on this sample. 89% of sampled posts carry both a caption and at least one hashtag (a well-kept feed is usually above 80%), across 2 distinct formats.

Weight 15% · 60 × upside score (top-post likes ÷ median likes: 1×→30, 2×→60, 3×→80, ≥5×→100) + 25 × caption-and-hashtag share + 15 × format mix (1.0 if ≥2 product types, else 0.5)

Upside unavailable (the median post draws fewer than 30 visible likes, too thin a base for a breakout ratio); its weight was redistributed. enrichment 0.89 (caption + ≥1 hashtag), format mix 1.0 (2 distinct product types).

Growth Signals

Not measurable

Weight 10% · clamp(50 + weekly follower growth % × 25, 0, 100), where weekly % = (followers now ÷ followers then − 1) × 100 ÷ weeks

This is the first recorded audit of this account, so there is no observation window yet. Instagram publishes no follower history — Instapect measures growth by comparing snapshots it takes itself, and the trend appears from the second audit that is at least 7 days later.

Growth & cadence

Instagram publishes no follower history, so Instapect builds its own: every audit records a snapshot, and the trend below is measured across those snapshots. Everything else here comes from the visible posting record.

Follower growth

This is the first recorded audit of this account, so there is no observation window yet. Instagram publishes no follower history — Instapect measures growth by comparing snapshots it takes itself, and the trend appears from the second audit that is at least 7 days later.

Engagement rate per post (%)

Oldest to newest across the sampled posts. Unit: % of followers.

Likes and comments per post

Unit: absolute interactions per post.

Free account required

Create a free account to see when this account posts and when its audience actually responds — weekday mix and hour-of-day heatmap.

Engagement diagnostics

Averages are easily distorted by one viral post. The median tells you what a typical post actually does — read them side by side.

Average engagement rate

10.26%

Mean of (likes + comments) ÷ followers

Comment-only engagement rate

0.51%

Comments ÷ followers × 100 — the honest fallback when likes are hidden

Median engagement rate

5.00%

Middle post in the sample

Comment-to-like ratio

5.3%

Higher means more conversational audience

Like-based sample

3of 9 posts

6 posts hide their like count and are excluded from like-based numbers only — they still count for cadence, format, captions and comments (9 posts).

Free account required

Create a free account to see the full engagement distribution — how far the best and worst posts sit from the median.

Content leaderboard

Posts ranked by engagement rate by followers. Pinned posts are shown because a reader will recognise them, but they sit outside the measured window and feed no average, rate or rhythm.

Free account required

Create a free account to see the full content breakdown — every top post with its thumbnail and per-post engagement rate.

Hashtags & mentions

Frequency from captions in the sample, with the average engagement rate of the posts each tag appears on. Association, not causation.

Free account required

Create a free account to see the full hashtag and mention detail, with the engagement associated with each tag.

Action plan

Prioritised by expected impact, written from the measured data above. The advisor sees only the metrics this report could actually compute — never an estimate, never a metric Instagram keeps private.

Free account required

Create a free account to read the full AI action plan, the content plan, post ideas, hashtag strategy and best time to post for this account.

Methodology & caveats

What this report measures, how, and what it deliberately does not claim.

What this account does not make measurable

  • 6 of 9 sampled posts hide their like count. They stay in the sample for cadence, format, caption and comment metrics, and are excluded only from like-based ones, which are computed from 3 posts.
  • 3 pinned posts were detected at the head of the response and excluded from the content window, leaving 9 of the 12 returned items. Pinned posts hold permanent placement and keep accumulating engagement, and the oldest one manufactures a gap that never happened — so they are excluded from cadence, gaps, regularity, format mix and every average. They still appear in the content leaderboard, badged "Pinned".
  • The content sample is the 9-item recent-posts window. The reels endpoint reaches further back and covers Reels only, so it is used to enrich matched items with their play count (8 matched) — never to extend the sample, which would inflate the Reel share and corrupt cadence.
  • 4 older Reels outside the content window are shown separately in "Top Reels by plays" with their own window, and are excluded from every average, the format mix and all cadence maths.
  • Play counts are published public counts shown only where the provider returns them. They are not reach, views or watch time, and none of those are available for a public-profile audit.

KPI definitions

  • Engagement rate by followers = (average likes + average comments) ÷ followers × 100.
  • Median engagement rate = the middle post's engagement rate in the sample; robust to viral outliers.
  • Posting cadence = (sampled posts − 1) ÷ days spanned × 7. Intervals, not posts: n posts span n−1 gaps. Unavailable below 2 posts or a zero-day window.
  • Instapect Score = 0.35 × Engagement + 0.25 × Engagement Quality + 0.15 × Consistency + 0.15 × Content Performance + 0.10 × Growth Signals, renormalised over the sub-scores that could be measured. Every account is graded against peers in its own follower tier; Audience Reach is reported separately and carries no weight.
  • Comment-to-like ratio = average comments ÷ average likes × 100. A healthy conversational account sits between 1% and 3%.

Sample, source & limits

  • 9 public posts sampled (3 usable for like-based metrics) · retrieved 12 Sept 2026 · served from the 24-hour cache.
  • Only lawfully-visible public signals are used: published posts, visible counts, captions, hashtags, mentions and timestamps.
  • Instapect never reports reach, impressions, audience demographics, Story insights or Reels watch-time. Those are private to the account owner and any tool claiming them for a third party is guessing.
  • Benchmarks are published industry medians by follower tier and are indicative, not guarantees. Any forward-looking figure is labelled an estimate with its method stated.

Share this score

A ready-to-post card with the Instapect Score, grade and the headline public metrics. Free to download — no account needed.

No card generated for this profile yet.

Cards show only lawfully-visible public metrics and carry the sample size and retrieval date, so anyone who sees one can check the full report.

This report is built only from lawfully-visible public Instagram signals — published posts and visible counts. It contains no reach, impressions, demographics, Story insights or watch-time, because nobody outside the account can see those. Request removal and the report is delisted from the directory, the category hubs and the sitemap.