@mazani.khonesh profile picture

@mazani.khonesh

@mazani.khonesh

93.5K
Followers
187
Following
Not published
Posts
91Instapect ScoreA+

Instapect Score

91/100 · grade A+ — a performance read, benchmarked against 25K–100K followers.

Micro tier93.5K followersAudience Reach64/100Benchmarked against 25K–100K followers
Engagement rate
6.93%

by followers · typical 1.80%

Avg likes
6,135

median 3,681

Avg comments
348

median 337

Cadence
4.8

posts / week · 1.5 d apart

Comment-to-like
5.67%

healthy band 1–3%

Median ER
4.25%

middle post in the sample

Public-profile audit · 9 posts sampled (3 pinned excluded) · retrieved 9 Sept 2026· served from cache

▫️آنجا که مازندران آواز می‌شود… 🌿 ▫️ از قصه‌ها و شخصیت‌ها تا تاریخ و فرهنگ این سرزمین ▫️مازندران را آن‌گونه که کمتر شنیده‌ای روایت می‌کنیم

t.me/mazani_khonesh1

Profile snapshot

Headline public metrics for @mazani.khonesh, from 9 sampled posts. Averages sit beside medians so one viral post cannot flatter the picture.

Engagement rate

6.93%

(avg likes + avg comments) ÷ followers · median 4.25% · 25K–100K followers

Average likes

6,135

Median 3,681 · 9 posts with a visible like count

Average comments

348

Median 337 · comment-to-like 5.7%

Posting cadence

4.8posts / week

About one post every 1.5 days

Latest posts

Newest first · engagement rate by followers per post

8 Sept 2026 · reel

📍 مازندران ـ صبح سه شنبه ۱۷ شهریور آسمان دیشب شبیه بغضِ فروخورده‌ی مردمانش بود بغضی که با خشم می بارید گویی طبیعت، درد آدمی را عمیق‌تر از هر کسی به یاد دارد. 🎙️ @dotar_mahmodi @mazani.khonesh #مازنی_خونش #مازندران #وارش

26.9K

likes

553

comments

29.39%

ER

4 Sept 2026 · carousel

اگه اصطلاحی بلدی که شاید خیلیا نشنیده باشن، تو کامنـ.ـت‌ها برامون بنویس 🌿 #مازنی_خونش #اصطلاحات_مازندرانی #مازندرانی #مازنی

3,326

likes

509

comments

4.10%

ER

3 Sept 2026 · reel

🦌 مرال؛ میراث زنده جنگل‌های هیرکانی مرال، یا گوزن قرمز، یکی از ارزشمندترین ساکنان جنگل‌های هیرکانی و نمادی از حیات وحش مازندران است. اما هر سال از حدود ۱۵ شهریور تا ۱۵ مهر، جنگل وارد روزهای حساسی می‌شود؛ فصل گاوبانگی. مرال‌های نر در این دوره برای جفت‌یابی و تعیین قلمرو بانگ می‌زنند و با رقبای خود رقابت می‌کنند. این صدا، فقط یک صدای زیبا برای شنیدن نیست؛ بخشی از چرخه طبیعی و ادامه نسل این حیوان است. یک چیز را یادمان باشد: جنگل، سالن کنسرت نیست. آمدن به زیستگاه مرال‌ها برای شنیدن گاوبانگی، نزدیک شدن، نور انداختن، سر و صدا کردن یا تعقیب حیوان، می‌تواند آرامش این جانور را در حساس‌ترین روزهای زندگی‌اش مختل کند. مرال برای ما آواز نمی‌خواند؛ برای ادامه نسل خودش بانگ می‌زند. پس اگر واقعاً عاشق طبیعتیم، گاهی بهترین شکل دوست داشتنش این است که صدای جنگل را از دور بشنویم و مزاحمش نشویم. مرال را تماشا نکنیم؛ حفظش کنیم. 🌿🦌 @mazani.khonesh اَرفِع کوهِِ سَرِ سو رِ نکوشین مَستِ اِشکارِ چِمر رِ نکوشین 🎙️ @peyman_ahmadi_kaliji @dariushahmadipour #مازنی_خونش #سوادکوه #هیرکانی #مرال #جنگل

3,681

likes

208

comments

4.16%

ER

2 Sept 2026 · reel

قصه واقعی از نکا | «طالب» ـ قسمت اول مازندران سال‌هاست منظومه‌ای عاشقانه و غمگین به نام «طالبا» دارد؛ قصه‌ی طالبی که نامش با داغ و فراق گره خورده و برایش شعرها سروده‌اند و نغمه‌ها خوانده‌اند... اما در روستای زرندین نکا، جوانی به نام طالب هم بود؛ با قصه‌ای واقعی، اما به همان اندازه تلخ... تازه‌داماد بود؛ از زندگی‌اش گذشت و راهی جبهه شد. ماه‌عسلش، میدان جنگ بود و وقتی رفت، همسرش باردار بود... کودکی به دنیا آمد که پدرش هرگز فرصت نکرد او را ببیند. پدر و مادرش سال‌ها چشم‌به‌راه ماندند؛ اما طالب برنگشت... گویی این بار، «طالبا» را برای یک طالبِ واقعی سروده بودند... این قصه، روایت واقعی طالب روستای زرندین نکا است. شهـ.ـید میر ابوطالب هاشم زاده حاج سید تقی هاشم زاده «پدرشـ.هید» حاج خیرالنسا صابری «مادر شـ.ـهید» @mazani.khonesh @zarandinolia_official #زرندین #نکا #مازندران #طالبا

4,533

likes

279

comments

5.14%

ER

30 Aug 2026 · reel

مازیار؛ مردی که حاضر نشد طبرستان را تسلیم کند در روزگاری که عباسیان بر بخش بزرگی از ایران فرمان می‌راندند، در دل کوهستان‌های طبرستان مردی ایستاد که حاضر نبود سرزمینش را به آسانی تسلیم کند. مازیار، فرمانروای طبرستان، علیه قدرت عباسیان شورید. کوهستان‌های سرسخت، جنگل‌های انبوه و مردمی که سال‌ها طعم مقاومت را چشیده بودند، پشت او بودند. نام مازیار قرن‌هاست که در تاریخ ایران با مقاومت طبرستان گره خورده است. ⚔️ این، قصهٔ مردی بود که حاضر نشد به آسانی سرزمینش را تسلیم کند؛ مازیار، فرمانروایی از دل طبرستان. اگر به تاریخ ایران و طبرستان علاقه داری، این صفحه رو دنبال کن. @mazani.khonesh #مازنی_خونش #مازیار #طبرستان #مازندران #تاریخ_ایران تاریخ_ایرانی تاریخ_مازندران تاریخ_طبرستان ایران ایران_زمین تاریخ شاهان_ایران قیام_مازیار عباسیان مقاومت قهرمانان_ایرانی تاریخ_اسلام ایرانیان مازندران هویت_ایرانی سرگذشت_ایران روایت_تاریخی

1,037

likes

165

comments

1.28%

ER

29 Aug 2026 · reel

🖤 درگذشت استاد شعبان نیکخو قادیکلایی، هنرمند پیشکسوت موسیقی مازندران استاد شعبان نیکخو قادیکلایی، فرزند رمضان، در سال ۱۳۲۹ در روستای قادیکلای قائمشهر دیده به جهان گشود و در همان دیار پرورش یافت. او در آغاز زندگی به چوپانی مشغول بود و بعدها به‌عنوان کارگر در نساجی شماره ۲ قائمشهر فعالیت کرد. استاد نیکخو موسیقی را نزد پدر خویش آموخت و از سال ۱۳۵۲ به‌صورت رسمی و حرفه‌ای، فعالیت هنری خود را در کنار زنده‌یاد استاد احمد محسن‌پور ادامه داد. این هنرمند پیشکسوت، از راویان برجسته آوازهای محلی مازندران و چاربیداری‌خوانی بود و سال‌های بسیاری از عمر ارزشمند خود را صرف پاسداشت، حفظ و انتقال موسیقی بومی و اصیل مازندران کرد. استاد شعبان نیکخو قادیکلایی همچنین همکاری‌های ماندگار و ارزنده‌ای با گروه‌های مطرح موسیقی مازندرانی، از جمله گروه امیر پازواری، گروه شواش و گروه طالبا داشت و نام و صدای خود را در حافظه موسیقی این سرزمین به یادگار گذاشت. اکنون با درگذشت این هنرمند گرانقدر، موسیقی بومی مازندران یکی از راویان و پاسداران ارزشمند خود را از دست داد. روحش شاد یادش گرامی 🖤🌹 @mazani.khonesh #مازنی_خونش #مازندران #شعبان_نیکخو #قادیکلا #قائمشهر

2,630

likes

337

comments

3.17%

ER

How the score was built

The verdict is at the top of the page; this is the reasoning underneath it. Every sub-score prints its own weight and formula — no black box.

Archetype

High-Engagement Community

Both the rate of response and the depth of it are strong — this audience reacts and talks back.

Nominal weights: Engagement 35% · Engagement Quality 25% · Consistency 15% · Content Performance 15% · Growth 10%. Audience Reach is context only and carries no weight — every account is graded against peers in its own follower tier · composite from 4 of 5 signals — unavailable sub-scores are excluded from both sums, not scored zero

Audience Reach

64 /100

Micro tier

93,542 followers (10K–100K followers). An asset score: how many people this account can reach. It does not move with how well the posts perform.

What this means

Engagement is top-decile for this size

Engagement rate 6.93% is at or above the 3.80% top-decile mark for 25K–100K followers. Audience responsiveness is the strength of this account, not something it needs to fix.

Audience Reach

64 /100

93,542 followers puts this account in the Micro tier (10K–100K followers). This is an asset score — how many people the account can reach — and it never moves based on how well the posts perform.

Weight 0% · log-scaled followers: L = log10(followers); L≤3 → 5–25, 3<L≤6 → 25 + (L − 3) × 20, L>6 → 85 + (L − 6) × 15, capped 100

log10(93,542) = 4.97, mapped as 25 + (L − 3) × 20 across the 1K–1M range (1K=25, 10K=45, 100K=65, 1M=85, 10M=100).

Engagement

100 /100

Engagement rate 6.93%, at or above the 3.80% top-decile rate for accounts with 25K–100K followers. Typical is 1.80%.

Weight 35% · piecewise-linear percentile curve for 25K–100K followers: 0%→5, p25 0.90%→30, p50 1.80%→55, p90 3.80%→85, 6.84%→100

Engagement rate 6.93% mapped onto the 25K–100K followers percentile curve (0%→5, p25 0.90%→30, p50 1.80%→55, p90 3.80%→85), measured across 9 of 9 sampled posts with visible like counts.

Engagement Quality

100 /100

5.67 comments per 100 likes, above the 1–3% healthy band, an unusually conversational audience. A comment costs far more effort than a like, so this ratio measures conversation rather than reach.

Weight 25% · comment-to-like ratio = avg comments ÷ avg likes × 100, mapped 0%→5, 0.5%→30, 1.5%→65, 3%→90, ≥5%→100

5.67 comments per 100 likes mapped as 0%→5, 0.5%→30, 1.5%→65, 3%→90, ≥5%→100.

Consistency

50 /100

Posting cadence 4.80 posts per week, inside the healthy 3–7 per week band. Gaps between posts vary by 0.83× the mean gap of 1.5 days — under 0.5× reads as a dependable rhythm.

Weight 15% · 60 × (1 − clamp(stdev(gaps) ÷ mean(gaps), 0, 1)) + 40 × cadence factor (0/wk → 0, 3/wk → 1.0, 3–7/wk → 1.0, 14/wk → 0.6, ≥21/wk → 0.3)

regularity 0.17 (1 − stdev 1.2d ÷ mean gap 1.5d) and cadence factor 1.00 from 4.8 posts/week (0→0, ramping to 1.0 at 3/wk, flat 1.0 through 7/wk, tapering to 0.6 at 14/wk and 0.3 at 21+/wk).

Content Performance

97 /100

The best post in the window drew 5.0× the median post's likes — 1× means no post ever breaks out, 3× or more means the account reliably produces outliers worth repeating. 89% of sampled posts carry both a caption and at least one hashtag (a well-kept feed is usually above 80%), across 2 distinct formats.

Weight 15% · 60 × upside score (top-post likes ÷ median likes: 1×→30, 2×→60, 3×→80, ≥5×→100) + 25 × caption-and-hashtag share + 15 × format mix (1.0 if ≥2 product types, else 0.5)

upside 5.00× (top post 26,940 likes ÷ median 3,681) scoring 100, enrichment 0.89 (caption + ≥1 hashtag), format mix 1.0 (2 distinct product types).

Growth Signals

Not measurable

Weight 10% · clamp(50 + weekly follower growth % × 25, 0, 100), where weekly % = (followers now ÷ followers then − 1) × 100 ÷ weeks

This is the first recorded audit of this account, so there is no observation window yet. Instagram publishes no follower history — Instapect measures growth by comparing snapshots it takes itself, and the trend appears from the second audit that is at least 7 days later.

Growth & cadence

Instagram publishes no follower history, so Instapect builds its own: every audit records a snapshot, and the trend below is measured across those snapshots. Everything else here comes from the visible posting record.

Follower growth

This is the first recorded audit of this account, so there is no observation window yet. Instagram publishes no follower history — Instapect measures growth by comparing snapshots it takes itself, and the trend appears from the second audit that is at least 7 days later.

Engagement rate per post (%)

Oldest to newest across the sampled posts. Unit: % of followers.

Likes and comments per post

Unit: absolute interactions per post.

Free account required

Create a free account to see when this account posts and when its audience actually responds — weekday mix and hour-of-day heatmap.

Engagement diagnostics

Averages are easily distorted by one viral post. The median tells you what a typical post actually does — read them side by side.

Average engagement rate

6.93%

Mean of (likes + comments) ÷ followers

Comment-only engagement rate

0.37%

Comments ÷ followers × 100 — the honest fallback when likes are hidden

Median engagement rate

4.25%

Middle post in the sample

Comment-to-like ratio

5.7%

Higher means more conversational audience

Like-based sample

9of 9 posts

Every sampled post shows its like count. Comment metrics use all 9 posts.

Free account required

Create a free account to see the full engagement distribution — how far the best and worst posts sit from the median.

Content leaderboard

Posts ranked by engagement rate by followers. Pinned posts are shown because a reader will recognise them, but they sit outside the measured window and feed no average, rate or rhythm.

Free account required

Create a free account to see the full content breakdown — every top post with its thumbnail and per-post engagement rate.

Hashtags & mentions

Frequency from captions in the sample, with the average engagement rate of the posts each tag appears on. Association, not causation.

Free account required

Create a free account to see the full hashtag and mention detail, with the engagement associated with each tag.

Action plan

Prioritised by expected impact, written from the measured data above. The advisor sees only the metrics this report could actually compute — never an estimate, never a metric Instagram keeps private.

Free account required

Create a free account to read the full AI action plan, the content plan, post ideas, hashtag strategy and best time to post for this account.

Methodology & caveats

What this report measures, how, and what it deliberately does not claim.

What this account does not make measurable

  • 3 pinned posts were detected at the head of the response and excluded from the content window, leaving 9 of the 12 returned items. Pinned posts hold permanent placement and keep accumulating engagement, and the oldest one manufactures a gap that never happened — so they are excluded from cadence, gaps, regularity, format mix and every average. They still appear in the content leaderboard, badged "Pinned".
  • The content sample is the 9-item recent-posts window. The reels endpoint reaches further back and covers Reels only, so it is used to enrich matched items with their play count (7 matched) — never to extend the sample, which would inflate the Reel share and corrupt cadence.
  • 5 older Reels outside the content window are shown separately in "Top Reels by plays" with their own window, and are excluded from every average, the format mix and all cadence maths.
  • Play counts are published public counts shown only where the provider returns them. They are not reach, views or watch time, and none of those are available for a public-profile audit.

KPI definitions

  • Engagement rate by followers = (average likes + average comments) ÷ followers × 100.
  • Median engagement rate = the middle post's engagement rate in the sample; robust to viral outliers.
  • Posting cadence = (sampled posts − 1) ÷ days spanned × 7. Intervals, not posts: n posts span n−1 gaps. Unavailable below 2 posts or a zero-day window.
  • Instapect Score = 0.35 × Engagement + 0.25 × Engagement Quality + 0.15 × Consistency + 0.15 × Content Performance + 0.10 × Growth Signals, renormalised over the sub-scores that could be measured. Every account is graded against peers in its own follower tier; Audience Reach is reported separately and carries no weight.
  • Comment-to-like ratio = average comments ÷ average likes × 100. A healthy conversational account sits between 1% and 3%.

Sample, source & limits

  • 9 public posts sampled (9 usable for like-based metrics) · retrieved 9 Sept 2026 · served from the 24-hour cache.
  • Only lawfully-visible public signals are used: published posts, visible counts, captions, hashtags, mentions and timestamps.
  • Instapect never reports reach, impressions, audience demographics, Story insights or Reels watch-time. Those are private to the account owner and any tool claiming them for a third party is guessing.
  • Benchmarks are published industry medians by follower tier and are indicative, not guarantees. Any forward-looking figure is labelled an estimate with its method stated.

Share this score

A ready-to-post card with the Instapect Score, grade and the headline public metrics. Free to download — no account needed.

No card generated for this profile yet.

Cards show only lawfully-visible public metrics and carry the sample size and retrieval date, so anyone who sees one can check the full report.

This report is built only from lawfully-visible public Instagram signals — published posts and visible counts. It contains no reach, impressions, demographics, Story insights or watch-time, because nobody outside the account can see those. Request removal and the report is delisted from the directory, the category hubs and the sitemap.