МЕДИЦИНСКИЙ ЦЕНТР | КАРДИМЕД | КАРАГАНДА

@kardimedkrg

1,594
Followers: 4
Following: 12
Posts

32Instapect ScoreF

Instapect Score

32/100 · grade F — a performance read, benchmarked against under 5K followers.

Nano tier1,594 followersAudience Reach29/100Benchmarked against under 5K followers

Engagement rate: 2.37%
Avg likes: 35
Avg comments: 3
Cadence: 1.7
Comment-to-like: 9.21%
Median ER: 0.88%

Public-profile audit · 11 posts sampled (1 pinned excluded) · retrieved 8 Sept 2026· served from cache

Забота о Вашем сердце🫀 •Коронарография, стентирование •Высококвалифицированный персонал •Современные м-ды лечения Консультации ⤵️ 📞 87075847822

Profile snapshot

Headline public metrics for @kardimedkrg, from 11 sampled posts. Averages sit beside medians so one viral post cannot flatter the picture.

Engagement rate

2.37%

(avg likes + avg comments) ÷ followers · median 0.88% · under 5K followers

Average likes

Median 13 · 11 posts with a visible like count

Average comments

Median 1 · comment-to-like 9.2%

Posting cadence

1.7posts / week

About one post every 4.1 days

How the score was built

The verdict is at the top of the page; this is the reasoning underneath it. Every sub-score prints its own weight and formula — no black box.

Archetype

Developing Profile

No single pattern dominates yet. The sub-scores below show which dimension moves the result most.

Nominal weights: Engagement 35% · Engagement Quality 25% · Consistency 15% · Content Performance 15% · Growth 10%. Audience Reach is context only and carries no weight — every account is graded against peers in its own follower tier · composite from 3 of 5 signals — unavailable sub-scores are excluded from both sums, not scored zero

Audience Reach

29 /100

Nano tier

1,594 followers (under 10K followers). An asset score: how many people this account can reach. It does not move with how well the posts perform.

What this means

A few posts carry the average

Median likes (13) are only 38% of the average (35), so a small number of strong posts is lifting the mean. Read the median as the typical result and treat the outliers as a template worth repeating.

Audience Reach

29 /100

1,594 followers puts this account in the Nano tier (under 10K followers). This is an asset score — how many people the account can reach — and it never moves based on how well the posts perform.

Weight 0% · log-scaled followers: L = log10(followers); L≤3 → 5–25, 3<L≤6 → 25 + (L − 3) × 20, L>6 → 85 + (L − 6) × 15, capped 100

log10(1,594) = 3.20, mapped as 25 + (L − 3) × 20 across the 1K–1M range (1K=25, 10K=45, 100K=65, 1M=85, 10M=100).

Engagement

35 /100

Engagement rate 2.37%, between the 2.00% bottom quartile and the 4.00% typical rate for accounts with under 5K followers. Typical is 4.00%.

Weight 35% · piecewise-linear percentile curve for under 5K followers: 0%→5, p25 2.00%→30, p50 4.00%→55, p90 8.00%→85, 14.40%→100

Engagement rate 2.37% mapped onto the under 5K followers percentile curve (0%→5, p25 2.00%→30, p50 4.00%→55, p90 8.00%→85), measured across 11 of 11 sampled posts with visible like counts.

Engagement Quality

Not measurable

Weight 25% · comment-to-like ratio = avg comments ÷ avg likes × 100, mapped 0%→5, 0.5%→30, 1.5%→65, 3%→90, ≥5%→100

The typical post carries 1 comments, below the 5-comment base at which a comment-to-like ratio is statistically meaningful. One or two reactions expressed as a percentage is not a measurement, so the weight is redistributed rather than scored.

Consistency

36 /100

Posting cadence 1.73 posts per week, approaching the healthy 3–7 per week band. Gaps between posts vary by 0.79× the mean gap of 4.1 days — under 0.5× reads as a dependable rhythm.

Weight 15% · 60 × (1 − clamp(stdev(gaps) ÷ mean(gaps), 0, 1)) + 40 × cadence factor (0/wk → 0, 3/wk → 1.0, 3–7/wk → 1.0, 14/wk → 0.6, ≥21/wk → 0.3)

regularity 0.21 (1 − stdev 3.2d ÷ mean gap 4.1d) and cadence factor 0.58 from 1.7 posts/week (0→0, ramping to 1.0 at 3/wk, flat 1.0 through 7/wk, tapering to 0.6 at 14/wk and 0.3 at 21+/wk).

Content Performance

19 /100

Breakout upside could not be measured on this sample. 0% of sampled posts carry both a caption and at least one hashtag (a well-kept feed is usually above 80%), across 1 distinct format.

Weight 15% · 60 × upside score (top-post likes ÷ median likes: 1×→30, 2×→60, 3×→80, ≥5×→100) + 25 × caption-and-hashtag share + 15 × format mix (1.0 if ≥2 product types, else 0.5)

Upside unavailable (the median post draws fewer than 30 visible likes, too thin a base for a breakout ratio); its weight was redistributed. enrichment 0.00 (caption + ≥1 hashtag), format mix 0.5 (1 distinct product type).

Growth Signals

Not measurable

Weight 10% · clamp(50 + weekly follower growth % × 25, 0, 100), where weekly % = (followers now ÷ followers then − 1) × 100 ÷ weeks

This is the first recorded audit of this account, so there is no observation window yet. Instagram publishes no follower history — Instapect measures growth by comparing snapshots it takes itself, and the trend appears from the second audit that is at least 7 days later.

Growth & cadence

Instagram publishes no follower history, so Instapect builds its own: every audit records a snapshot, and the trend below is measured across those snapshots. Everything else here comes from the visible posting record.

Follower growth

Engagement rate per post (%)

Oldest to newest across the sampled posts. Unit: % of followers.

Likes and comments per post

Unit: absolute interactions per post.

Free account required

Create a free account to see when this account posts and when its audience actually responds — weekday mix and hour-of-day heatmap.

Create a free account Sign in

Engagement diagnostics

Averages are easily distorted by one viral post. The median tells you what a typical post actually does — read them side by side.

Average engagement rate

2.37%

Mean of (likes + comments) ÷ followers

Comment-only engagement rate

0.20%

Comments ÷ followers × 100 — the honest fallback when likes are hidden

Median engagement rate

0.88%

Middle post in the sample

Comment-to-like ratio

9.2%

Higher means more conversational audience

Like-based sample

11of 11 posts

Every sampled post shows its like count. Comment metrics use all 11 posts.

Free account required

Create a free account to see the full engagement distribution — how far the best and worst posts sit from the median.

Create a free account Sign in

Content leaderboard

Posts ranked by engagement rate by followers. Pinned posts are shown because a reader will recognise them, but they sit outside the measured window and feed no average, rate or rhythm.

#	Post	Date	Format	Likes	Comments	Plays	ER
1	Вопрос ответ от нашего врача 💫	10 Aug 2026	reel	193	23	18.3K	13.55%
2	No caption	12 Aug 2026	reel	40	6	2,526	2.89%
3	No caption	3 Aug 2026	reel	39	2	1,676	2.57%
4	Когда речь идёт о здоровье сердца, важно доверять своё здоровье профессионалам. В клинике «Кардинет» приём ведут квалифицированные врачи с большим практическим опытом. Мы используем современное диагностическое оборудование, чтобы выявлять заболевания сердечно-сосудистой системы на ранних стадиях и подбирать эффективное лечение для каждого пациента. Наша цель — не просто поставить диагноз, а помочь сохранить здоровье, улучшить качество жизни и предотвратить развитие серьёзных осложнений. В клинике «Кардинет» вы можете пройти комплексное обследование, получить консультацию специалиста и быть уверенными, что на каждом этапе лечения рядом будут внимательные и опытные врачи. ❤️ Доверьте здоровье своего сердца профессионалам. Запишитесь на консультацию уже сегодня.	21 Jul 2026	reel	29	1	1,677	1.88%
5	Отзывы от наших пациентов🥹 Выздоровливайте🌸	30 Jul 2026	reel	21	1	1,153	1.38%
6	❤️ Коронарография — точная диагностика сосудов сердца Боль или жжение в груди, одышка, чувство давления и дискомфорт при нагрузке могут быть сигналами того, что сердцу не хватает кровоснабжения. Коронарография позволяет врачу увидеть состояние коронарных артерий и определить: ✔️ есть ли сужение сосудов; ✔️ где именно находится проблемный участок; ✔️ насколько выражено сужение; ✔️ какая дальнейшая тактика лечения необходима. Исследование проводится по медицинским показаниям и помогает врачу получить точную информацию о состоянии сосудов сердца. 📍 Кардимед г. Караганда, ул. Шахтёров, 1/4 Берегите сердце и не откладывайте обследование при тревожных симптома	23 Aug 2026	reel	13	1	479	0.88%
7	❤️ Здоровье сердца начинается с точной диагностики. Если вас беспокоят боли или дискомфорт в груди, одышка, повышенное давление или другие симптомы, не откладывайте визит к врачу. Коронарография — один из самых точных методов исследования сосудов сердца. Она позволяет выявить сужения и закупорки коронарных артерий, оценить кровоток и своевременно подобрать эффективное лечение. В клинике «Кардимед» процедуру проводят опытные специалисты на современном оборудовании, соблюдая высокие стандарты безопасности и качества. Не ждите, пока проблема станет серьёзной. Своевременная диагностика помогает предотвратить инфаркт и сохранить здоровье сердца на долгие годы. ❤️ Кардимед — профессиональная забота о вашем сердце	22 Jul 2026	reel	13	0	646	0.82%
8	No caption	16 Jul 2026	reel	12	0	608	0.75%
9	No caption	23 Aug 2026	reel Pinned	9	0	476	0.56%
10	No caption	14 Jul 2026	reel	7	0	603	0.44%

Top Reels by plays

Published play counts only — not reach, views or watch time.

Separate population from the audit sample · 12 Reels with a published play count · 14 Jul 2026 – 23 Aug 2026.

Вопрос ответ от нашего врача 💫
18.3K
plays
No caption
2,526
plays
Когда речь идёт о здоровье сердца, важно доверять своё здоровье профессионалам. В клинике «Кардинет» приём ведут квалифицированные врачи с большим практическим опытом. Мы используем современное диагностическое оборудование, чтобы выявлять заболевания сердечно-сосудистой системы на ранних стадиях и подбирать эффективное лечение для каждого пациента. Наша цель — не просто поставить диагноз, а помочь сохранить здоровье, улучшить качество жизни и предотвратить развитие серьёзных осложнений. В клинике «Кардинет» вы можете пройти комплексное обследование, получить консультацию специалиста и быть уверенными, что на каждом этапе лечения рядом будут внимательные и опытные врачи. ❤️ Доверьте здоровье своего сердца профессионалам. Запишитесь на консультацию уже сегодня.
1,677
plays
No caption
1,676
plays
Отзывы от наших пациентов🥹 Выздоровливайте🌸
1,153
plays

Free account required

Create a free account to see the full content breakdown — every top post with its thumbnail and per-post engagement rate.

Create a free account Sign in

Hashtags & mentions

Frequency from captions in the sample, with the average engagement rate of the posts each tag appears on. Association, not causation.

Free account required

Create a free account to see the full hashtag and mention detail, with the engagement associated with each tag.

Create a free account Sign in

Action plan

Prioritised by expected impact, written from the measured data above. The advisor sees only the metrics this report could actually compute — never an estimate, never a metric Instagram keeps private.

Content plan

Built by arithmetic over this account's audited sample — no estimates, no metrics Instagram keeps private. Anything that could not be measured is left out rather than guessed.

Target cadence: Measured cadence is 1.7 posts per week, averaging 4.1 days between posts. Recommendation: lift from 1.7 to 3–4 posts a week. The 3–7 per week band is where consistency scores highest without thinning each post's engagement.
Format mix to shift toward: Observed across the 11-post window: clips 11/11. Everything is clips. Adding a second format is the single cheapest way to raise the content-performance sub-score, because format mix is one of its three terms.
What the best post did differently: The strongest post in the window drew 193 likes against a median of 13 — 14.85× the typical post — as a clips published 10 Aug 2026, opening "Вопрос ответ от нашего врача 💫". Treat that post as a template, not a fluke: repeat its format and its opening move.
Captions & hashtags: 0% of sampled posts carry both a caption and at least one hashtag; a well-kept feed sits above 80%. No hashtags were found in the sampled captions, so there is no measured tag performance to build on yet. Association, not causation — tags travel with the posts, they do not by themselves cause them.
Best time to post: Mon carries the highest measured engagement of any posting day in the sample at 8.06%. Most sampled posts go out around 06:00 (2 of 11). This is the account's own posting record, not an audience-activity metric — Instagram keeps those private to the owner.

5 post ideas for this account

1.Rebuild the clips that drew 193 likes as a series — same structure, new subject, published on Mon.
2.A carousel that answers the question the audience keeps asking in comments — the account averages 3 comments a post, so the raw material is already there.
3.A post that invites a specific reply rather than a generic one, to defend the 9.21% comment-to-like ratio.
4.Re-issue the strongest evergreen subject with a full caption and 3–5 tags — only 0% of sampled posts currently carry both.
5.A short, cheap-to-produce format the account can sustain weekly — cadence is 1.7 posts a week and consistency is the sub-score with the most headroom.

Copy as prompt

One self-contained prompt carrying this account's real measured numbers. Paste it into any AI assistant and it will write a 4-week plan specific to this account rather than a generic one.

You are a social media strategist. Here is a public audit of the Instagram
account @kardimedkrg (МЕДИЦИНСКИЙ ЦЕНТР | КАРДИМЕД | КАРАГАНДА), retrieved 8 Sept 2026.
Sample: 11 public posts.

Audience: 1,594 followers, Nano tier.
Engagement rate by followers: 2.37% (peer typical 4.00%, top decile 8.00%).
Average likes 35 (median 13).
Average comments 3 (median 1).
Comment-to-like ratio: 9.21%.
Posting cadence: 1.7 posts/week, average 4.1 days between posts.
Format mix observed: clips 11/11.
Best post drew 14.85x the median post's likes.
Captions with at least one hashtag: 0%.
Strongest measured posting day: Mon at 8.06% engagement.
Most common posting hour: 06:00 local.
Instapect Score 32/100 (F) — Developing Profile.

Using only the numbers above, produce a 4-week content plan for this account:
a weekly posting schedule, the format for each slot, 10 post concepts with
hooks, a caption template, and a hashtag strategy. Be specific to this
account's actual performance pattern. Do not invent metrics.

Free account required

Create a free account to read the full AI action plan, the content plan, post ideas, hashtag strategy and best time to post for this account.

Create a free account Sign in

Methodology & caveats

What this report measures, how, and what it deliberately does not claim.

What this account does not make measurable

1 pinned post was detected at the head of the response and excluded from the content window, leaving 11 of the 12 returned items. Pinned posts hold permanent placement and keep accumulating engagement, and the oldest one manufactures a gap that never happened — so they are excluded from cadence, gaps, regularity, format mix and every average. They still appear in the content leaderboard, badged "Pinned".
The content sample is the 11-item recent-posts window. The reels endpoint reaches further back and covers Reels only, so it is used to enrich matched items with their play count (12 matched) — never to extend the sample, which would inflate the Reel share and corrupt cadence.
Play counts are published public counts shown only where the provider returns them. They are not reach, views or watch time, and none of those are available for a public-profile audit.

KPI definitions

Engagement rate by followers = (average likes + average comments) ÷ followers × 100.
Median engagement rate = the middle post's engagement rate in the sample; robust to viral outliers.
Posting cadence = (sampled posts − 1) ÷ days spanned × 7. Intervals, not posts: n posts span n−1 gaps. Unavailable below 2 posts or a zero-day window.
Instapect Score = 0.35 × Engagement + 0.25 × Engagement Quality + 0.15 × Consistency + 0.15 × Content Performance + 0.10 × Growth Signals, renormalised over the sub-scores that could be measured. Every account is graded against peers in its own follower tier; Audience Reach is reported separately and carries no weight.
Comment-to-like ratio = average comments ÷ average likes × 100. A healthy conversational account sits between 1% and 3%.

Sample, source & limits

11 public posts sampled (11 usable for like-based metrics) · retrieved 8 Sept 2026 · served from the 24-hour cache.
Only lawfully-visible public signals are used: published posts, visible counts, captions, hashtags, mentions and timestamps.
Instapect never reports reach, impressions, audience demographics, Story insights or Reels watch-time. Those are private to the account owner and any tool claiming them for a third party is guessing.
Benchmarks are published industry medians by follower tier and are indicative, not guarantees. Any forward-looking figure is labelled an estimate with its method stated.

Share this score

A ready-to-post card with the Instapect Score, grade and the headline public metrics. Free to download — no account needed.

No card generated for this profile yet.

Cards show only lawfully-visible public metrics and carry the sample size and retrieval date, so anyone who sees one can check the full report.

This report is built only from lawfully-visible public Instagram signals — published posts and visible counts. It contains no reach, impressions, demographics, Story insights or watch-time, because nobody outside the account can see those. Request removal and the report is delisted from the directory, the category hubs and the sitemap.