@kameshcreates profile picture

@kameshcreates Verified

@kameshcreates · Business

37.7K
Followers
14
Following
Not published
Posts
81Instapect ScoreA−

Instapect Score

81/100 · grade A− — a performance read, benchmarked against 25K–100K followers.

Micro tier37.7K followersAudience Reach57/100Benchmarked against 25K–100K followers
Engagement rate
3.21%

by followers · typical 1.80%

Avg likes
756

median 756

Avg comments
455

median 455

Cadence
0.3

posts / week · 24.0 d apart

Comment-to-like
60.19%

healthy band 1–3%

Median ER
3.21%

middle post in the sample

Public-profile audit · 2 posts sampled (10 pinned excluded) · retrieved 10 Sept 2026· served from cache

Your Friendly Neighbourhood Editor AI Editing • Freelance • StartupBusiness Building My Community Publicly Do you want👇🏻

www.clonemybrand.com/

Profile snapshot

Headline public metrics for @kameshcreates, from 2 sampled posts. Averages sit beside medians so one viral post cannot flatter the picture.

Engagement rate

3.21%

(avg likes + avg comments) ÷ followers · median 3.21% · 25K–100K followers

Average likes

756

Median 756 · 2 posts with a visible like count

Average comments

455

Median 455 · comment-to-like 60.2%

Posting cadence

0.3posts / week

About one post every 24.0 days

Latest posts

Newest first · engagement rate by followers per post

8 Sept 2026 · reel

Want to create Cinematic AI videos with Consistency Characters ?😱 Comment “TUTORIAL” and i ll share the full tutorial! Follow for more @kameshcreates #kameshcreates #ai #videoediting #chatgpt #charactersheet

Pinned · outside the measured window

837

likes

412

comments

3.31%

ER

7 Sept 2026 · reel

Comment “DC” for Prompt👇🏻 We created This scene Entirely in Higgsfield Genjutsu Ai tool! Follow for More @kameshcreates #kameshcreates #ai #videoediting #higgsfield

Pinned · outside the measured window

407

likes

161

comments

1.51%

ER

6 Sept 2026 · reel

Our Version of DC Its totally Created in Higgsfield Genzutsu 👇🏻 #kameshcreates #ai #higgsfield #dc #videoediting

Pinned · outside the measured window

800

likes

45

comments

2.24%

ER

5 Sept 2026 · reel

20Sec Tutorial Viral Radhima Ai Video!👇🏻🤯 Check the Link in Bio if you want Assets #kameshcreates #ai #videoediting #higgsfield #chatgpt

Pinned · outside the measured window

16.1K

likes

875

comments

45.09%

ER

1 Sept 2026 · reel

Comment “Assets” 👇🏻 Follow for more @kameshcreates #kameshcreates #ai #videoediting

636

likes

900

comments

4.07%

ER

21 Aug 2026 · reel

Your iPhone video looks 🔥 straight out of camera… but the moment you import it into editing software, the colors just DIE 💀 This happened to me for MONTHS before I figured out why. It’s not your camera. It’s not your footage. It’s how editing software reads iPhone’s color profile. #iphonecolors #videoediting #kameshcreates #davinciresolve

Pinned · outside the measured window

1,440

likes

12

comments

3.85%

ER

How the score was built

The verdict is at the top of the page; this is the reasoning underneath it. Every sub-score prints its own weight and formula — no black box.

Archetype

High-Engagement Community

Both the rate of response and the depth of it are strong — this audience reacts and talks back.

Nominal weights: Engagement 35% · Engagement Quality 25% · Consistency 15% · Content Performance 15% · Growth 10%. Audience Reach is context only and carries no weight — every account is graded against peers in its own follower tier · composite from 3 of 5 signals — unavailable sub-scores are excluded from both sums, not scored zero

Audience Reach

57 /100

Micro tier

37,728 followers (10K–100K followers). An asset score: how many people this account can reach. It does not move with how well the posts perform.

What this means

Posting frequency is the most controllable lever

At 0.29 posts per week — one every 24 days — the account publishes less than once a week. Unlike engagement rate, cadence is entirely within the owner's control, which makes it the cheapest thing on this page to change.

Performance is genuinely consistent

Median likes (756) are 100% of the average (756). No viral outlier is propping up the average, so every number in this report describes what a typical post actually does — a dependable baseline is a real asset when planning.

Audience Reach

57 /100

37,728 followers puts this account in the Micro tier (10K–100K followers). This is an asset score — how many people the account can reach — and it never moves based on how well the posts perform.

Weight 0% · log-scaled followers: L = log10(followers); L≤3 → 5–25, 3<L≤6 → 25 + (L − 3) × 20, L>6 → 85 + (L − 6) × 15, capped 100

log10(37,728) = 4.58, mapped as 25 + (L − 3) × 20 across the 1K–1M range (1K=25, 10K=45, 100K=65, 1M=85, 10M=100).

Engagement

76 /100

Engagement rate 3.21%, above the 1.80% typical rate for accounts with 25K–100K followers. Typical is 1.80%.

Weight 35% · piecewise-linear percentile curve for 25K–100K followers: 0%→5, p25 0.90%→30, p50 1.80%→55, p90 3.80%→85, 6.84%→100

Engagement rate 3.21% mapped onto the 25K–100K followers percentile curve (0%→5, p25 0.90%→30, p50 1.80%→55, p90 3.80%→85), measured across 2 of 2 sampled posts with visible like counts.

Engagement Quality

100 /100

60.19 comments per 100 likes, above the 1–3% healthy band, an unusually conversational audience. A comment costs far more effort than a like, so this ratio measures conversation rather than reach.

Weight 25% · comment-to-like ratio = avg comments ÷ avg likes × 100, mapped 0%→5, 0.5%→30, 1.5%→65, 3%→90, ≥5%→100

60.19 comments per 100 likes mapped as 0%→5, 0.5%→30, 1.5%→65, 3%→90, ≥5%→100.

Consistency

Not measurable

Weight 15% · 60 × (1 − clamp(stdev(gaps) ÷ mean(gaps), 0, 1)) + 40 × cadence factor (0/wk → 0, 3/wk → 1.0, 3–7/wk → 1.0, 14/wk → 0.6, ≥21/wk → 0.3)

The content window holds fewer than three posts, so gap variability cannot be distinguished from a single interval and neither regularity nor cadence is meaningful.

Content Performance

60 /100

Breakout upside could not be measured on this sample. 100% of sampled posts carry both a caption and at least one hashtag (a well-kept feed is usually above 80%), across 1 distinct format.

Weight 15% · 60 × upside score (top-post likes ÷ median likes: 1×→30, 2×→60, 3×→80, ≥5×→100) + 25 × caption-and-hashtag share + 15 × format mix (1.0 if ≥2 product types, else 0.5)

Upside unavailable (fewer than 3 visible-like posts); its weight was redistributed. enrichment 1.00 (caption + ≥1 hashtag), format mix 0.5 (1 distinct product type).

Growth Signals

Not measurable

Weight 10% · clamp(50 + weekly follower growth % × 25, 0, 100), where weekly % = (followers now ÷ followers then − 1) × 100 ÷ weeks

This is the first recorded audit of this account, so there is no observation window yet. Instagram publishes no follower history — Instapect measures growth by comparing snapshots it takes itself, and the trend appears from the second audit that is at least 7 days later.

Growth & cadence

Instagram publishes no follower history, so Instapect builds its own: every audit records a snapshot, and the trend below is measured across those snapshots. Everything else here comes from the visible posting record.

Follower growth

This is the first recorded audit of this account, so there is no observation window yet. Instagram publishes no follower history — Instapect measures growth by comparing snapshots it takes itself, and the trend appears from the second audit that is at least 7 days later.

Engagement rate per post (%)

Oldest to newest across the sampled posts. Unit: % of followers.

Likes and comments per post

Unit: absolute interactions per post.

Free account required

Create a free account to see when this account posts and when its audience actually responds — weekday mix and hour-of-day heatmap.

Engagement diagnostics

Averages are easily distorted by one viral post. The median tells you what a typical post actually does — read them side by side.

Average engagement rate

3.21%

Mean of (likes + comments) ÷ followers

Comment-only engagement rate

1.21%

Comments ÷ followers × 100 — the honest fallback when likes are hidden

Median engagement rate

3.21%

Middle post in the sample

Comment-to-like ratio

60.2%

Higher means more conversational audience

Like-based sample

2of 2 posts

Every sampled post shows its like count. Comment metrics use all 2 posts.

Free account required

Create a free account to see the full engagement distribution — how far the best and worst posts sit from the median.

Content leaderboard

Posts ranked by engagement rate by followers. Pinned posts are shown because a reader will recognise them, but they sit outside the measured window and feed no average, rate or rhythm.

Free account required

Create a free account to see the full content breakdown — every top post with its thumbnail and per-post engagement rate.

Hashtags & mentions

Frequency from captions in the sample, with the average engagement rate of the posts each tag appears on. Association, not causation.

Free account required

Create a free account to see the full hashtag and mention detail, with the engagement associated with each tag.

Action plan

Prioritised by expected impact, written from the measured data above. The advisor sees only the metrics this report could actually compute — never an estimate, never a metric Instagram keeps private.

Free account required

Create a free account to read the full AI action plan, the content plan, post ideas, hashtag strategy and best time to post for this account.

Methodology & caveats

What this report measures, how, and what it deliberately does not claim.

What this account does not make measurable

  • 10 pinned posts were detected at the head of the response and excluded from the content window, leaving 2 of the 12 returned items. Pinned posts hold permanent placement and keep accumulating engagement, and the oldest one manufactures a gap that never happened — so they are excluded from cadence, gaps, regularity, format mix and every average. They still appear in the content leaderboard, badged "Pinned".
  • The content sample is the 2-item recent-posts window. The reels endpoint reaches further back and covers Reels only, so it is used to enrich matched items with their play count (11 matched) — never to extend the sample, which would inflate the Reel share and corrupt cadence.
  • 1 older Reels outside the content window are shown separately in "Top Reels by plays" with their own window, and are excluded from every average, the format mix and all cadence maths.
  • Play counts are published public counts shown only where the provider returns them. They are not reach, views or watch time, and none of those are available for a public-profile audit.

KPI definitions

  • Engagement rate by followers = (average likes + average comments) ÷ followers × 100.
  • Median engagement rate = the middle post's engagement rate in the sample; robust to viral outliers.
  • Posting cadence = (sampled posts − 1) ÷ days spanned × 7. Intervals, not posts: n posts span n−1 gaps. Unavailable below 2 posts or a zero-day window.
  • Instapect Score = 0.35 × Engagement + 0.25 × Engagement Quality + 0.15 × Consistency + 0.15 × Content Performance + 0.10 × Growth Signals, renormalised over the sub-scores that could be measured. Every account is graded against peers in its own follower tier; Audience Reach is reported separately and carries no weight.
  • Comment-to-like ratio = average comments ÷ average likes × 100. A healthy conversational account sits between 1% and 3%.

Sample, source & limits

  • 2 public posts sampled (2 usable for like-based metrics) · retrieved 10 Sept 2026 · served from the 24-hour cache.
  • Only lawfully-visible public signals are used: published posts, visible counts, captions, hashtags, mentions and timestamps.
  • Instapect never reports reach, impressions, audience demographics, Story insights or Reels watch-time. Those are private to the account owner and any tool claiming them for a third party is guessing.
  • Benchmarks are published industry medians by follower tier and are indicative, not guarantees. Any forward-looking figure is labelled an estimate with its method stated.

Share this score

A ready-to-post card with the Instapect Score, grade and the headline public metrics. Free to download — no account needed.

No card generated for this profile yet.

Cards show only lawfully-visible public metrics and carry the sample size and retrieval date, so anyone who sees one can check the full report.

This report is built only from lawfully-visible public Instagram signals — published posts and visible counts. It contains no reach, impressions, demographics, Story insights or watch-time, because nobody outside the account can see those. Request removal and the report is delisted from the directory, the category hubs and the sitemap.