Instapect
Sign inCreate account
@jetop_to profile picture

@jetop_to

@jetop_to

4,445
Followers
124
Following
Not published
Posts
65Instapect ScoreB−

Instapect Score

65/100 · grade B− — a performance read, benchmarked against under 5K followers.

Nano tier4,445 followersAudience Reach38/100Benchmarked against under 5K followers
Engagement rate
5.56%

by followers · typical 4.00%

Avg likes
245

median 98

Avg comments
3

median 2

Cadence
0.9

posts / week · 8.0 d apart

Comment-to-like
1.08%

healthy band 1–3%

Median ER
2.23%

middle post in the sample

Public-profile audit · 11 posts sampled (1 pinned excluded) · retrieved 9 Sept 2026· served from cache

🏆 Top 100 JE al mondo 📈 La Web Agency gestita da Studenti del @politecnicoditorino 🎯 Consulenza Marketing e Comunicazione, IT, Design e Videomaking

linktr.ee/jetop_to

Profile snapshot

Headline public metrics for @jetop_to, from 11 sampled posts. Averages sit beside medians so one viral post cannot flatter the picture.

Engagement rate

5.56%

(avg likes + avg comments) ÷ followers · median 2.23% · under 5K followers

Average likes

245

Median 98 · 11 posts with a visible like count

Average comments

3

Median 2 · comment-to-like 1.1%

Posting cadence

0.9posts / week

About one post every 8.0 days

Latest posts

Newest first · engagement rate by followers per post

28 Aug 2026 · reel

👀 Se poteste dare un consiglio a voi stessi di qualche anno fa, cosa direste? Valeria Albizzati e Fulvio Boscolo si sono messi a nudo con questa domanda, tra scelte non scontate e percorsi che li hanno portati lontano da dove erano partiti. 🎙️ In questa puntata di JEToast raccontano come si costruisce un percorso quando la strada più facile non è quella giusta per te. 🎧 Trovate la puntata intera sul nostro canale YouTube #JEToP #AlwaysOneStepForward #JEToast

98

likes

1

comments

2.23%

ER

13 Aug 2026 · reel

🩺 Sbagliare fa parte di ogni mestiere. In alcuni, però, pesa diversamente. In questa puntata @matteo.bassetti_official ci racconta cosa significa fallire quando hai la vita delle persone tra le mani, perché l’empatia conta quanto la diagnosi, e come si scelgono le parole quando tutto un Paese ti ascolta. 🎧 Trovate la puntata intera sui nostri canali YouTube e Spotify #JEToP #AlwaysOneStepForward #JEToast #MatteoBassetti

51

likes

2

comments

1.19%

ER

24 Jul 2026 · reel

👀 Quante volte hai pensato “questa è letteralmente la mia vita”? Loro quel pensiero lo hanno trasformato in un progetto seguito da 110mila persone. 🎙️ In questa puntata @unilifeduo ci raccontano com’è nato tutto, cosa cambia quando l’università diventa il tuo contenuto, e cosa succede quando è il professore a riconoscerti. Spoiler: all’esame non aiuta. 🎧 Trovate la puntata intera sul nostro canale YouTube #JEToP #AlwaysOneStepForward #JEToast #UniLifeDuo

1,346

likes

1

comments

30.30%

ER

13 Jul 2026 · carousel

🏆Ai mondiali non giocano solo le squadre. Giocano anche i brand, cercando di farsi notare mentre l’attenzione di tutti è già altrove: sul campo, sui tifosi, sulle emozioni. 👀 Levi’s, Stella Artois e Coca-Cola hanno scelto tre modi diversi per entrare nella conversazione, senza limitarsi a mettere un logo in bella vista. 💡 Perché il marketing fatto bene non interrompe quello che stai guardando. Trova il modo di diventarne parte. ⚽ Quale brand ha giocato meglio la sua partita? #JEToP #AlwaysOneStepForward #Mondiali2k26 #IGC

55

likes

0

comments

1.24%

ER

10 Jul 2026 · reel

👀 Apparire o costruire? Oggi è facilissimo sembrare qualcuno online, ma è molto più difficile esserlo davvero. 🎙️ In questa puntata @sicitalian_ ci spiega come ribaltare la prospettiva: smettere di rincorrere l’algoritmo e iniziare a usare i social come un mezzo per sbloccare opportunità reali. Un bel bagno di realtà, senza frasi fatte. 🎧 Trovate la puntata intera sul nostro canale YouTube #JEToP #AlwaysOneStepForward #JEToast #Sicitalian

419

likes

3

comments

9.49%

ER

9 Jul 2026 · reel

🏠 Lasciare la propria terra è doloroso ma fondamentale per crescere, per poi tornare e dare un vero valore aggiunto. Non si tratta di fuggire, ma di arricchirsi per costruire. 🎙️ In questa puntata speciale per @tedxpolitecnicoditorino Nicolò lancia un messaggio potente a tutti i giovani. Restare nella propria comfort zone non è sempre un atto d’amore per il territorio, a volte è solo il timore di mettersi in gioco.  🎧 Non perderti la prossima puntata! Fuori domani sul nostro canale YouTube #JEToP #AlwaysOneStepForward #JEToast #fugadicervelli

199

likes

13

comments

4.77%

ER

How the score was built

The verdict is at the top of the page; this is the reasoning underneath it. Every sub-score prints its own weight and formula — no black box.

Archetype

Breakout Creator

Produces outliers well above its own baseline. The best posts are a template, not luck.

Nominal weights: Engagement 35% · Engagement Quality 25% · Consistency 15% · Content Performance 15% · Growth 10%. Audience Reach is context only and carries no weight — every account is graded against peers in its own follower tier · composite from 3 of 5 signals — unavailable sub-scores are excluded from both sums, not scored zero

Audience Reach

38 /100

Nano tier

4,445 followers (under 10K followers). An asset score: how many people this account can reach. It does not move with how well the posts perform.

What this means

The audience talks back

1.08 comments per 100 likes falls inside the healthy 1–3% band. Comments cost far more effort than a like, so this is a genuine sign the content invites a response.

Posting frequency is the most controllable lever

At 0.87 posts per week — one every 8 days — the account publishes less than once a week. Unlike engagement rate, cadence is entirely within the owner's control, which makes it the cheapest thing on this page to change.

A few posts carry the average

Median likes (98) are only 40% of the average (245), so a small number of strong posts is lifting the mean. Read the median as the typical result and treat the outliers as a template worth repeating.

Audience Reach

38 /100

4,445 followers puts this account in the Nano tier (under 10K followers). This is an asset score — how many people the account can reach — and it never moves based on how well the posts perform.

Weight 0% · log-scaled followers: L = log10(followers); L≤3 → 5–25, 3<L≤6 → 25 + (L − 3) × 20, L>6 → 85 + (L − 6) × 15, capped 100

log10(4,445) = 3.65, mapped as 25 + (L − 3) × 20 across the 1K–1M range (1K=25, 10K=45, 100K=65, 1M=85, 10M=100).

Engagement

67 /100

Engagement rate 5.56%, above the 4.00% typical rate for accounts with under 5K followers. Typical is 4.00%.

Weight 35% · piecewise-linear percentile curve for under 5K followers: 0%→5, p25 2.00%→30, p50 4.00%→55, p90 8.00%→85, 14.40%→100

Engagement rate 5.56% mapped onto the under 5K followers percentile curve (0%→5, p25 2.00%→30, p50 4.00%→55, p90 8.00%→85), measured across 11 of 11 sampled posts with visible like counts.

Engagement Quality

Not measurable

Weight 25% · comment-to-like ratio = avg comments ÷ avg likes × 100, mapped 0%→5, 0.5%→30, 1.5%→65, 3%→90, ≥5%→100

The typical post carries 2 comments, below the 5-comment base at which a comment-to-like ratio is statistically meaningful. One or two reactions expressed as a percentage is not a measurement, so the weight is redistributed rather than scored.

Consistency

27 /100

Posting cadence 0.87 posts per week, below the 1-per-week floor most active accounts clear. Gaps between posts vary by 0.75× the mean gap of 8.0 days — under 0.5× reads as a dependable rhythm.

Weight 15% · 60 × (1 − clamp(stdev(gaps) ÷ mean(gaps), 0, 1)) + 40 × cadence factor (0/wk → 0, 3/wk → 1.0, 3–7/wk → 1.0, 14/wk → 0.6, ≥21/wk → 0.3)

regularity 0.25 (1 − stdev 6.0d ÷ mean gap 8.0d) and cadence factor 0.29 from 0.9 posts/week (0→0, ramping to 1.0 at 3/wk, flat 1.0 through 7/wk, tapering to 0.6 at 14/wk and 0.3 at 21+/wk).

Content Performance

100 /100

The best post in the window drew 5.0× the median post's likes — 1× means no post ever breaks out, 3× or more means the account reliably produces outliers worth repeating. 100% of sampled posts carry both a caption and at least one hashtag (a well-kept feed is usually above 80%), across 3 distinct formats.

Weight 15% · 60 × upside score (top-post likes ÷ median likes: 1×→30, 2×→60, 3×→80, ≥5×→100) + 25 × caption-and-hashtag share + 15 × format mix (1.0 if ≥2 product types, else 0.5)

upside 5.00× (top post 1,346 likes ÷ median 98) scoring 100, enrichment 1.00 (caption + ≥1 hashtag), format mix 1.0 (3 distinct product types).

Growth Signals

Not measurable

Weight 10% · clamp(50 + weekly follower growth % × 25, 0, 100), where weekly % = (followers now ÷ followers then − 1) × 100 ÷ weeks

This is the first recorded audit of this account, so there is no observation window yet. Instagram publishes no follower history — Instapect measures growth by comparing snapshots it takes itself, and the trend appears from the second audit that is at least 7 days later.

Growth & cadence

Instagram publishes no follower history, so Instapect builds its own: every audit records a snapshot, and the trend below is measured across those snapshots. Everything else here comes from the visible posting record.

Follower growth

This is the first recorded audit of this account, so there is no observation window yet. Instagram publishes no follower history — Instapect measures growth by comparing snapshots it takes itself, and the trend appears from the second audit that is at least 7 days later.

Engagement rate per post (%)

Oldest to newest across the sampled posts. Unit: % of followers.

Likes and comments per post

Unit: absolute interactions per post.

Free account required

Create a free account to see when this account posts and when its audience actually responds — weekday mix and hour-of-day heatmap.

Create a free accountSign in

Engagement diagnostics

Averages are easily distorted by one viral post. The median tells you what a typical post actually does — read them side by side.

Average engagement rate

5.56%

Mean of (likes + comments) ÷ followers

Comment-only engagement rate

0.06%

Comments ÷ followers × 100 — the honest fallback when likes are hidden

Median engagement rate

2.23%

Middle post in the sample

Comment-to-like ratio

1.1%

Higher means more conversational audience

Like-based sample

11of 11 posts

Every sampled post shows its like count. Comment metrics use all 11 posts.

Free account required

Create a free account to see the full engagement distribution — how far the best and worst posts sit from the median.

Create a free accountSign in

Content leaderboard

Posts ranked by engagement rate by followers. Pinned posts are shown because a reader will recognise them, but they sit outside the measured window and feed no average, rate or rhythm.

Free account required

Create a free account to see the full content breakdown — every top post with its thumbnail and per-post engagement rate.

Create a free accountSign in

Hashtags & mentions

Frequency from captions in the sample, with the average engagement rate of the posts each tag appears on. Association, not causation.

Free account required

Create a free account to see the full hashtag and mention detail, with the engagement associated with each tag.

Create a free accountSign in

Action plan

Prioritised by expected impact, written from the measured data above. The advisor sees only the metrics this report could actually compute — never an estimate, never a metric Instagram keeps private.

Free account required

Create a free account to read the full AI action plan, the content plan, post ideas, hashtag strategy and best time to post for this account.

Create a free accountSign in

Methodology & caveats

What this report measures, how, and what it deliberately does not claim.

What this account does not make measurable

  • 1 pinned post was detected at the head of the response and excluded from the content window, leaving 11 of the 12 returned items. Pinned posts hold permanent placement and keep accumulating engagement, and the oldest one manufactures a gap that never happened — so they are excluded from cadence, gaps, regularity, format mix and every average. They still appear in the content leaderboard, badged "Pinned".
  • The content sample is the 11-item recent-posts window. The reels endpoint reaches further back and covers Reels only, so it is used to enrich matched items with their play count (6 matched) — never to extend the sample, which would inflate the Reel share and corrupt cadence.
  • 6 older Reels outside the content window are shown separately in "Top Reels by plays" with their own window, and are excluded from every average, the format mix and all cadence maths.
  • Play counts are published public counts shown only where the provider returns them. They are not reach, views or watch time, and none of those are available for a public-profile audit.

KPI definitions

  • Engagement rate by followers = (average likes + average comments) ÷ followers × 100.
  • Median engagement rate = the middle post's engagement rate in the sample; robust to viral outliers.
  • Posting cadence = (sampled posts − 1) ÷ days spanned × 7. Intervals, not posts: n posts span n−1 gaps. Unavailable below 2 posts or a zero-day window.
  • Instapect Score = 0.35 × Engagement + 0.25 × Engagement Quality + 0.15 × Consistency + 0.15 × Content Performance + 0.10 × Growth Signals, renormalised over the sub-scores that could be measured. Every account is graded against peers in its own follower tier; Audience Reach is reported separately and carries no weight.
  • Comment-to-like ratio = average comments ÷ average likes × 100. A healthy conversational account sits between 1% and 3%.

Sample, source & limits

  • 11 public posts sampled (11 usable for like-based metrics) · retrieved 9 Sept 2026 · served from the 24-hour cache.
  • Only lawfully-visible public signals are used: published posts, visible counts, captions, hashtags, mentions and timestamps.
  • Instapect never reports reach, impressions, audience demographics, Story insights or Reels watch-time. Those are private to the account owner and any tool claiming them for a third party is guessing.
  • Benchmarks are published industry medians by follower tier and are indicative, not guarantees. Any forward-looking figure is labelled an estimate with its method stated.

Share this score

A ready-to-post card with the Instapect Score, grade and the headline public metrics. Free to download — no account needed.

No card generated for this profile yet.

Cards show only lawfully-visible public metrics and carry the sample size and retrieval date, so anyone who sees one can check the full report.

This report is built only from lawfully-visible public Instagram signals — published posts and visible counts. It contains no reach, impressions, demographics, Story insights or watch-time, because nobody outside the account can see those. Request removal and the report is delisted from the directory, the category hubs and the sitemap.