@emilie_cm_patrimoine profile picture

Emilie | Community Manager & Coach Patrimoine Historique 🏛️

@emilie_cm_patrimoine

497
Followers
438
Following
12
Posts
77Instapect ScoreB+

Instapect Score

77/100 · grade B+ — a performance read, benchmarked against under 5K followers.

Nano tier497 followersAudience Reach19/100Benchmarked against under 5K followers
Engagement rate
8.45%

by followers · typical 4.00%

Avg likes
26

median 26

Avg comments
16

median 16

Cadence
Not measurable

posts / week

Comment-to-like
61.54%

healthy band 1–3%

Median ER
8.45%

middle post in the sample

Public-profile audit · 1 posts sampled (11 pinned excluded) · retrieved 8 Sept 2026· served from cache

🏰 Châteaux, musées & sites historiques 🎟️ + de billets vendus grâce à Insta & Facebook 🤍 Une com qui rend ton lieu vivant & visible 💌 Parlons-en 👇🏼

calendly.com/emilie-cm-patrimoine/30min

Profile snapshot

Headline public metrics for @emilie_cm_patrimoine, from 1 sampled posts. Averages sit beside medians so one viral post cannot flatter the picture.

Engagement rate

8.45%

(avg likes + avg comments) ÷ followers · median 8.45% · under 5K followers

Average likes

26

Median 26 · 1 posts with a visible like count

Average comments

16

Median 16 · comment-to-like 61.5%

Posting cadence

posts / week

Not measurable from this sample

Latest posts

Newest first · engagement rate by followers per post

7 Sept 2026 · reel

🚨 90 % des sites historiques commettent cette erreur avant les Journées du Patrimoine… La plupart des monuments et musées attendent les 3 derniers jours pour publier leur programme. Résultat ? Une grande partie des visiteurs a déjà planifié son week-end ailleurs. Pour maximiser votre fréquentation pendant les JEP (ou tout autre événement) voici la stratégie à adopter : 1️⃣ En amont : Teasez le programme plusieurs semaines avant (Stories, Reels, publications) et rappelez régulièrement le lien de la billetterie 🎟️ 2️⃣ Le Jour J : Publiez en direct ! Les Stories de dernière minute incitent les habitants locaux à se déplacer sur un coup de tête. 3️⃣ L’après-événement : Valorisez les meilleurs moments en Reel pour prolonger l’impact et ancrer votre notoriété et donner envie de venir pour la prochaine édition! 💡Besoin d’aide pour structurer la communication de votre site historique ? Contactez-moi en DM pour échanger sur vos projets ! P.S. : Si vous avez suivi la vidéo jusqu’à la dernière seconde… vous avez vu le drame 😢🏺 #journeeseuropeennesdupatrimoine #culture #sitehistorique #jep #patrimoinehistorique

Pinned · outside the measured window

31

likes

11

comments

8.45%

ER

2 Sept 2026 · reel

Ce qu’on vous montre sur Insta VS la vraie vie en tournage ! 🎥 Parce que derrière les « beaux » Reels d’ @elysium_travel , il y a aussi… ça 😂 Et encore, ce n’est qu’une petite partie des coulisses! Petit rappel du jour : n’ayez pas peur de montrer aussi les petits ratés et les moments où tout ne se passe pas comme prévu. C’est souvent ça qui rend un contenu plus humain et crée du lien avec votre communauté. 🤎 Alors vous avez bien rigolé ? 🤣👇 #patrimoinehistorique #agencedevoyage #communicationdigitale #tourismeculturel #grecetourisme

Pinned · outside the measured window

34

likes

21

comments

11.07%

ER

25 Aug 2026 · reel

Ma visite dans un coin de Lorraine pas tout à fait comme les autres… ✨ Sur les traces de Jeanne d’Arc, figure emblématique de l’Histoire de France, à Domrémy-la-Pucelle. Sa maison natale, le lieu où elle aurait entendu ses premières voix, l’église où elle a été baptisée, le centre d’interprétation, puis la basilique Sainte-Jeanne-d’Arc… ⚜️ Un parcours qui permet de découvrir son histoire autrement, en parcourant les lieux qui ont marqué son enfance et les débuts de son incroyable destin. Et toi, tu savais qu’on pouvait visiter la maison natale de Jeanne d’Arc et tous ces lieux autour ? 👀 📲 Voici le type de contenu que je pourrais créer si je gérais la communication de votre site historique : raconter votre patrimoine pour donner envie de le découvrir sur les réseaux sociaux. #JeanneDArc #lorrainetourisme #HistoireDeFrance #sitehistorique #tourismeculturel

Pinned · outside the measured window

1,477

likes

110

comments

319.32%

ER

16 Aug 2026 · reel

Quand mon conjoint me soutient… à sa façon 🤎 🏰 Je suis trop contente d’avoir enfin une « vraie tenue » d’inspiration médiévale pour pouvoir vraiment me fondre dans le décor lors de mes prochaines captures de contenus dans les châteaux et fêtes médiévales 🫶 Dommage, j’aurais pu la mettre aujourd’hui à la Fête de la Principauté de Salm 🥲 @principaute_de_salm (reportée pour cause de canicule) Alors tu notes combien sur 10 cette robe ? 👗🏰

Pinned · outside the measured window

191

likes

42

comments

46.88%

ER

12 Aug 2026 · reel

Ce qui se passe en coulisses : la réalité du métier de CM en 1 minute 🎥😂 Un grand merci à l’équipe (et aux clients) d’Elysium Travel pour leur patience (et pour avoir survécu à mes exigences de tournage)🤎 Et encore… ce n’est que la partie 1, au bureau. 😂 La partie 2 sur le terrain / en excursion sera encore plus drôle 👀 Et vous, vous arrivez à garder votre sérieux devant une caméra ? 👇 #communitymanagerfreelance #tourismeculturel #sitehistorique #siteantique #agencedevoyage

Pinned · outside the measured window

31

likes

27

comments

11.67%

ER

5 Aug 2026 · reel

Il y a quelques années, j’étudiais ces lieux avec passion durant mes cours d’archéologie… 📚🏛️ Aujourd’hui, j’ai enfin eu la chance de les découvrir de mes propres yeux. Une sensation assez particulière quand on passe des livres à la réalité. Mon coup de cœur ? Sans hésiter, le Temple d’Athéna Aphaïa, sur l’île d’Égine. Un lieu à la fois majestueux et incroyablement paisible. 🏛️ Ces images ont été capturées dans le cadre de ma mission de création de contenu en Grèce pour mon client Elysium Travel. 🇬🇷 Au passage, j’ai testé un style de montage un peu différent sur ce Réel. J’espère qu’il vous plaira! Et toi, quel site historique aimerais-tu absolument découvrir un jour ? 👇 #patrimoinehistorique #sitehistorique #sitearchéologique #tourismeculturel #grèce

Pinned · outside the measured window

82

likes

22

comments

20.93%

ER

How the score was built

The verdict is at the top of the page; this is the reasoning underneath it. Every sub-score prints its own weight and formula — no black box.

Archetype

High-Engagement Community

Both the rate of response and the depth of it are strong — this audience reacts and talks back.

Nominal weights: Engagement 35% · Engagement Quality 25% · Consistency 15% · Content Performance 15% · Growth 10%. Audience Reach is context only and carries no weight — every account is graded against peers in its own follower tier · composite from 3 of 5 signals — unavailable sub-scores are excluded from both sums, not scored zero

Audience Reach

19 /100

Nano tier

497 followers (under 10K followers). An asset score: how many people this account can reach. It does not move with how well the posts perform.

What this means

Engagement is top-decile for this size

Engagement rate 8.45% is at or above the 8.00% top-decile mark for under 5K followers. Audience responsiveness is the strength of this account, not something it needs to fix.

Performance is genuinely consistent

Median likes (26) are 100% of the average (26). No viral outlier is propping up the average, so every number in this report describes what a typical post actually does — a dependable baseline is a real asset when planning.

Audience Reach

19 /100

497 followers puts this account in the Nano tier (under 10K followers). This is an asset score — how many people the account can reach — and it never moves based on how well the posts perform.

Weight 0% · log-scaled followers: L = log10(followers); L≤3 → 5–25, 3<L≤6 → 25 + (L − 3) × 20, L>6 → 85 + (L − 6) × 15, capped 100

log10(497) = 2.70, mapped as 25 + (L − 3) × 20 across the 1K–1M range (1K=25, 10K=45, 100K=65, 1M=85, 10M=100).

Engagement

86 /100

Engagement rate 8.45%, at or above the 8.00% top-decile rate for accounts with under 5K followers. Typical is 4.00%.

Weight 35% · piecewise-linear percentile curve for under 5K followers: 0%→5, p25 2.00%→30, p50 4.00%→55, p90 8.00%→85, 14.40%→100

Engagement rate 8.45% mapped onto the under 5K followers percentile curve (0%→5, p25 2.00%→30, p50 4.00%→55, p90 8.00%→85), measured across 1 of 1 sampled posts with visible like counts.

Engagement Quality

100 /100

61.54 comments per 100 likes, above the 1–3% healthy band, an unusually conversational audience. A comment costs far more effort than a like, so this ratio measures conversation rather than reach.

Weight 25% · comment-to-like ratio = avg comments ÷ avg likes × 100, mapped 0%→5, 0.5%→30, 1.5%→65, 3%→90, ≥5%→100

61.54 comments per 100 likes mapped as 0%→5, 0.5%→30, 1.5%→65, 3%→90, ≥5%→100.

Consistency

Not measurable

Weight 15% · 60 × (1 − clamp(stdev(gaps) ÷ mean(gaps), 0, 1)) + 40 × cadence factor (0/wk → 0, 3/wk → 1.0, 3–7/wk → 1.0, 14/wk → 0.6, ≥21/wk → 0.3)

The content window holds fewer than three posts, so gap variability cannot be distinguished from a single interval and neither regularity nor cadence is meaningful.

Content Performance

19 /100

Breakout upside could not be measured on this sample. 0% of sampled posts carry both a caption and at least one hashtag (a well-kept feed is usually above 80%), across 1 distinct format.

Weight 15% · 60 × upside score (top-post likes ÷ median likes: 1×→30, 2×→60, 3×→80, ≥5×→100) + 25 × caption-and-hashtag share + 15 × format mix (1.0 if ≥2 product types, else 0.5)

Upside unavailable (fewer than 3 visible-like posts); its weight was redistributed. enrichment 0.00 (caption + ≥1 hashtag), format mix 0.5 (1 distinct product type).

Growth Signals

Not measurable

Weight 10% · clamp(50 + weekly follower growth % × 25, 0, 100), where weekly % = (followers now ÷ followers then − 1) × 100 ÷ weeks

This is the first recorded audit of this account, so there is no observation window yet. Instagram publishes no follower history — Instapect measures growth by comparing snapshots it takes itself, and the trend appears from the second audit that is at least 7 days later.

Growth & cadence

Instagram publishes no follower history, so Instapect builds its own: every audit records a snapshot, and the trend below is measured across those snapshots. Everything else here comes from the visible posting record.

Follower growth

This is the first recorded audit of this account, so there is no observation window yet. Instagram publishes no follower history — Instapect measures growth by comparing snapshots it takes itself, and the trend appears from the second audit that is at least 7 days later.

Engagement rate per post (%)

Oldest to newest across the sampled posts. Unit: % of followers.

Likes and comments per post

Unit: absolute interactions per post.

Free account required

Create a free account to see when this account posts and when its audience actually responds — weekday mix and hour-of-day heatmap.

Engagement diagnostics

Averages are easily distorted by one viral post. The median tells you what a typical post actually does — read them side by side.

Average engagement rate

8.45%

Mean of (likes + comments) ÷ followers

Comment-only engagement rate

3.22%

Comments ÷ followers × 100 — the honest fallback when likes are hidden

Median engagement rate

8.45%

Middle post in the sample

Comment-to-like ratio

61.5%

Higher means more conversational audience

Like-based sample

1of 1 posts

Every sampled post shows its like count. Comment metrics use all 1 posts.

Free account required

Create a free account to see the full engagement distribution — how far the best and worst posts sit from the median.

Content leaderboard

Posts ranked by engagement rate by followers. Pinned posts are shown because a reader will recognise them, but they sit outside the measured window and feed no average, rate or rhythm.

Free account required

Create a free account to see the full content breakdown — every top post with its thumbnail and per-post engagement rate.

Hashtags & mentions

Frequency from captions in the sample, with the average engagement rate of the posts each tag appears on. Association, not causation.

Free account required

Create a free account to see the full hashtag and mention detail, with the engagement associated with each tag.

Action plan

Prioritised by expected impact, written from the measured data above. The advisor sees only the metrics this report could actually compute — never an estimate, never a metric Instagram keeps private.

Free account required

Create a free account to read the full AI action plan, the content plan, post ideas, hashtag strategy and best time to post for this account.

Methodology & caveats

What this report measures, how, and what it deliberately does not claim.

What this account does not make measurable

  • 11 pinned posts were detected at the head of the response and excluded from the content window, leaving 1 of the 12 returned items. Pinned posts hold permanent placement and keep accumulating engagement, and the oldest one manufactures a gap that never happened — so they are excluded from cadence, gaps, regularity, format mix and every average. They still appear in the content leaderboard, badged "Pinned".
  • The content sample is the 1-item recent-posts window. The reels endpoint reaches further back and covers Reels only, so it is used to enrich matched items with their play count (9 matched) — never to extend the sample, which would inflate the Reel share and corrupt cadence.
  • 3 older Reels outside the content window are shown separately in "Top Reels by plays" with their own window, and are excluded from every average, the format mix and all cadence maths.
  • Play counts are published public counts shown only where the provider returns them. They are not reach, views or watch time, and none of those are available for a public-profile audit.

KPI definitions

  • Engagement rate by followers = (average likes + average comments) ÷ followers × 100.
  • Median engagement rate = the middle post's engagement rate in the sample; robust to viral outliers.
  • Posting cadence = (sampled posts − 1) ÷ days spanned × 7. Intervals, not posts: n posts span n−1 gaps. Unavailable below 2 posts or a zero-day window.
  • Instapect Score = 0.35 × Engagement + 0.25 × Engagement Quality + 0.15 × Consistency + 0.15 × Content Performance + 0.10 × Growth Signals, renormalised over the sub-scores that could be measured. Every account is graded against peers in its own follower tier; Audience Reach is reported separately and carries no weight.
  • Comment-to-like ratio = average comments ÷ average likes × 100. A healthy conversational account sits between 1% and 3%.

Sample, source & limits

  • 1 public posts sampled (1 usable for like-based metrics) · retrieved 8 Sept 2026 · served from the 24-hour cache.
  • Only lawfully-visible public signals are used: published posts, visible counts, captions, hashtags, mentions and timestamps.
  • Instapect never reports reach, impressions, audience demographics, Story insights or Reels watch-time. Those are private to the account owner and any tool claiming them for a third party is guessing.
  • Benchmarks are published industry medians by follower tier and are indicative, not guarantees. Any forward-looking figure is labelled an estimate with its method stated.

Share this score

A ready-to-post card with the Instapect Score, grade and the headline public metrics. Free to download — no account needed.

No card generated for this profile yet.

Cards show only lawfully-visible public metrics and carry the sample size and retrieval date, so anyone who sees one can check the full report.

This report is built only from lawfully-visible public Instagram signals — published posts and visible counts. It contains no reach, impressions, demographics, Story insights or watch-time, because nobody outside the account can see those. Request removal and the report is delisted from the directory, the category hubs and the sitemap.